| Literature DB >> 33608862 |
Nicholas L Mills1,2, Olga Tura-Ceide3,4,5, Susan Gallogly1,2, Takeshi Fujisawa1,2, John D Hung1, Mairi Brittan1,2, Elizabeth M Skinner1,2, Andrew J Mitchell1, Claire Medine1,2, Neus Luque6, Erika Zodda7, Marta Cascante7,8, Patrick W Hadoke1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Endothelial dysfunction is central to the pathogenesis of acute coronary syndrome. The study of diseased endothelium is very challenging due to inherent difficulties in isolating endothelial cells from the coronary vascular bed. We sought to isolate and characterise coronary endothelial cells from patients undergoing thrombectomy for myocardial infarction to develop a patient-specific in vitro model of endothelial dysfunction.Entities:
Keywords: Acute myocardial infarction; Endothelial dysfunction; Endothelium; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Translational medicine
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33608862 PMCID: PMC8578063 DOI: 10.1007/s10557-021-07151-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiovasc Drugs Ther ISSN: 0920-3206 Impact factor: 3.727
Fig. 1Coronary atherothrombotic specimens from patients undergoing treatment for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. The border zone between cholesterol cleft rich atheroma and thrombus is evident (arrows) with Carstairs staining rendering erythrocytes, yellow, and fibrin, pink (a). Atherothrombotic specimens were composed of platelets (blue) (b), erythrocytes (c), leucocytes (d), cholesterol clefts (e), and CD146+ endothelial cells (f) encased in fibrin. Scale bars 50 μm
Fig. 2Outgrowth and characterisation of coronary endothelial outgrowth cells from atherothrombotic specimens. Outgrowth of coronary endothelial cells from dissected atherothrombotic specimen at 24 hours (a), colony formation at 7 days (b), and confluent cobblestone morphology at first passage (c). Cells stain positive for cytoplasmic expression of granular von Willebrand factor indicative of Weibel–Palade bodies (pink) and cell surface expression of CD31 (green) with 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) as a nuclei counterstain (blue) (d). Uptake of fluorescent labelled Dil-acetylated-LDL (red) with DAPI as a counterstain (e) and tube-like structure formation on MatrigelTM(f). Scale bar 100 μm. Coronary endothelial outgrowth cells strongly express cell surface antigens CD146, CD31, CD105, and CD54 and cytoplasmic antigens von Willebrand factor (vWF) and endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS), but do not express the pan leucocyte antigen CD45. Unstained (grey) and stained cells (black) (g)
Fig. 3Proliferation, adhesion, and wound migration of coronary endothelial outgrowth cells in vitro. Coronary endothelial outgrowth (CEO) cells had a higher population doubling time (PDT) during the first 9 passage in comparison to human coronary artery endothelial cells (HCAECs) and human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) (one-way analysis of variance P = 0.017; Bonferroni post-test *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01, respectively. n = 3–9) (a) and a lower cumulative population doubling level (CPDL) when maintained long term in culture (P < 0.0001; Bonferroni post-test ***P < 0.001 and ****P < 0.0001, respectively. n = 3–9) (b). CEO cells had a similar capacity to adhere to a collagen substrate in vitro (P = 0.662. n = 3–10) (c), but following the infliction of a linear wound in the endothelial cell monolayer, CEO cells had a reduced capacity to migrate in vitro in comparison to HUVECs (P = 0.008; Bonferroni post-test ****P < 0.0001. n = 3–7) (d)
Fig. 4Angiogenic potential of coronary endothelial outgrowth cells in vivo. Sponges embedded with growth factor reduced (GFR)-MatrigelTM (vehicle control) and GFR-MatrigelTM with coronary endothelial outgrowth (CEO) cells (a), late endothelial outgrowth cells (EOCs) (b), or human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) (c) were subcutaneously implanted into male NOD-SCID gamma mice. CEO cells and EOCs did not increase blood vessel number compared to vehicle controls (paired t test P = 0.207 and P = 0.365, respectively. n = 12), whereas HUVECs did increase vessel number (paired t test P = 0.030. n = 4). Light microscopy of haematoxylin/eosin stained sponge 4-μm sections from CEO impregnated sponge (d) and HUVEC impregnated sponge (e) (black arrows identify vessels)
Fig. 5Coronary endothelial outgrowth cells do not incorporate into murine vessels in vivo. Immunohistochemistry of subcutaneously implanted sponges embedded with CEO cells (a–c), EOCs (d–f), and HUVECs (g–i). Sections were stained with antibodies cross-reactive to both mouse and human antigens (red) or specific to human antigens (green) using 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) as a counterstain. Auto-fluorescent erythrocytes are presence in vessel lumen demonstrates the vessels were contiguous with the host circulation. Scale bars 50 μm. In contrast to late endothelial outgrowth cells (EOCs) and human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs), coronary endothelial outgrowth (CEO) cells did not incorporate into murine vessel (j) (one-way analysis of variance P = 0.019; Bonferroni post-test *P < 0.05 for CEO cells versus HUVECs. n = 4–10)