Literature DB >> 31657952

Endothelial Progenitor Cells Do Not Originate From the Bone Marrow.

Takeshi Fujisawa1, Olga Tura-Ceide2, Amanda Hunter1, Andrew Mitchell1, Alex Vesey1, Claire Medine1, Susan Gallogly1, Patrick W F Hadoke1, Charlotte Keith3, Anne Sproul4, Huw Roddie4, Grant McQuaker5, Ian Wilmut6, Nicholas L Mills1,7, Mairi Brittan1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  bone marrow cells; cell- and tissue-based therapy; endothelial progenitor cells

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31657952      PMCID: PMC6818974          DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.042351

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


× No keyword cloud information.
Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) are thought to originate from the bone marrow, mobilize in response to ischemia, and home to sites of vascular injury. Despite uncertainty regarding their origin, phenotype, and therapeutic viability, there remains great interest in harnessing EPCs to promote vascular regeneration. Autologous bone marrow cells have been delivered to thousands of patients, on the premise that these populations contain functional EPCs, with conflicting results.[1] One potential explanation for the lack of consistent benefit is that bone marrow is not the origin of circulating EPCs. Indeed, although late-outgrowth endothelial cells can be readily isolated from cord and peripheral blood,[2,3] we have not been able to obtain endothelial cells from the culture of bone marrow.[3] These findings suggest that circulating EPCs arise from an alternative niche in the vessel wall. To define EPC origin, we recruited 5 male participants (46±7 years) who had undergone allogeneic bone marrow transplant from female donors for the treatment of hematological malignancy 12 to 120 months previously. The study was performed with approval from our research ethics committee and with written informed consent. Complete donor chimerism was demonstrated in all participants at the time of enrollment. Early- and late-outgrowth endothelial cells were isolated from whole blood,[2,3] and vessel wall endothelial cells were harvested from forearm veins using a J-shaped guidewire and expanded in culture. The contribution of bone marrow cells to each lineage was assessed by using fluorescence in situ hybridization to detect the X and Y chromosomes, and supported by live cell imaging, flow cytometry, and immunofluorescence staining. Genotype was further analyzed by short tandem repeat analysis using multiplex polymerase chain reaction amplification and detection of DNA sequences of loci that frequently contain polymorphisms. Clonogenic potential at the single-cell level was quantified in each lineage, and the origin of clonogenic progenitors was assessed by fluorescence in situ hybridization. All early-outgrowth cells had an XX genotype consistent with bone marrow origin, formed clusters of spindle-shaped cells expressing high levels of the pan-leukocyte antigen CD45 rather than endothelial antigens, and did not undergo proliferation or clonogenic expansion (Figure, A and B). Therefore, early-outgrowth cells, previously described as endothelial cell colony-forming units, are hematopoietic and not the progeny of circulating EPCs. In contrast, all vessel wall endothelial cells had an XY genotype, confirming that they were not derived from bone marrow. These cells proliferated in culture to form a cobblestone monolayer with ubiquitous expression of CD31. During early passages, late-outgrowth endothelial cells had a mixed genotype with both XX and XY cells, although the proportion of cells with an XX genotype decreased from 24.8±4.4% to 0.8±0.5% by the third passage (P<0.01) (Figure, B). It is important to note that, of those expressing CD31, 99.3±0.7% had an XY genotype at the third passage and therefore did not arise from bone marrow (Figure, C). In contrast, those that did not express CD31 had an XX genotype and were likely contaminating hematopoietic cells commonly found by using this isolation protocol (Figure, D).[2] These cells expressed CD45, were observed overlying the endothelial monolayer in 3-dimensional confocal z-stacks (Figure, E), and were diminished from passage 1 to 3 (16.5±9.1% versus 1.8±0.9%; P<0.05), presumably because of their lack of proliferative capacity and inability to survive in endothelial-specific growth conditions. The origin of endothelial progenitor cells. A, Flow cytometric analysis of early-outgrowth cells, late-outgrowth endothelial cells, and vessel wall endothelial cells with antibodies to CD45, CD31, CD34, KDR, and CD146. Immunofluorescence staining for viable nuclei (DRAQ5, yellow), CD45 (blue), CD146 (magenta), and CD31 (green). Scale bar: 500 µm. B, Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for the X and Y chromosomes combined with CD31 staining of early-outgrowth cells (day 5), late-outgrowth endothelial cells (passage 1), and vessel wall endothelial cells (passage 1) in male patients with sex-mismatched bone marrow transplants. Representative images show Y chromosome (green), X chromosome (red), CD31 (yellow), and nuclei (DAPI, blue). Examples of CD31-negative cells with an XX genotype (white arrows) and CD31-positive cells with an XY genotype (yellow arrows) are shown. Scale bar: 20 μm. *P<0.001, one-way ANOVA. Genotype of early-outgrowth cells, late-outgrowth endothelial cells, and vessel wall endothelial cells with (C) and without (D) CD31 expression. E, Immunofluorescence for CD45 (blue) and CD31 (yellow) in late-outgrowth endothelial cells. Scale bar: 50 μm. F, Short tandem repeat analysis for the sex-specific locus, amelogenin. The proportion of cells with XX and XY genotype was calculated from polymerase chain reaction products of 104 and 110 base pairs corresponding to the X and Y chromosomes, respectively. *P<0.05, one-way ANOVA. G, Images showing expansion of a colony of late-outgrowth endothelial cells from a single endothelial progenitor cell of recipient origin (XY genotype). Y chromosome (green), X chromosome (red), CD31 (yellow), and nuclei (DAPI, blue). Scale bar: 100 μm. DAPI indicates 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole; and STR, short tandem repeat. Short tandem repeat analysis of the sex-specific amelogenin gene locus was consistent with fluorescence in situ hybridization (Figure, F), confirming the XX genotype of early-outgrowth cells, the XY genotype of vessel wall endothelial cells, and that late-outgrowth endothelial cells were initially of mixed genotype with a declining fraction of contaminating XX cells between passages 1 and 3 (36.3±2.2% to 5.9±3.6%, P<0.05). Clonogenic colonies expanded from single cells were only obtained for late-outgrowth endothelial cells (4/5 participants, 8.8±4.0% efficiency) (Figure, G). All clones expressed CD31 and were entirely XY in genotype. Although our study includes a small number of participants, we have systematically studied the origin of EPCs in people with sex-mismatched bone marrow transplantation by using 2 distinct but complementary methods. Although endothelial cells can be obtained from a circulating progenitor and are capable of clonal expansion, these cells do not share the genotype of the transplanted bone marrow. We conclude that EPCs in circulation do not originate from the bone marrow. Our findings contrast those of Lin and colleagues.[4] They recognized that single-cell culture would be necessary to definitively address whether endothelial cells capable of clonal expansion derive from bone marrow. These methods were used in our analysis demonstrating that all clones formed from single cells were derived from the recipient rather than from donor bone marrow. Our findings were internally consistent and clear, and in agreement with recent evidence showing that endogenous neovascularization in the heart is driven by tissue-resident EPCs without a direct contribution from bone marrow cells.[5] This represents a paradigm shift that requires a reevaluation of our approach to harness EPCs for therapeutic vascular regeneration.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the imaging facility and the flow cytometry facility at the MRC Centre for Regenerative Medicine at the University of Edinburgh for technical support. Prof Kuramoto at Kitasato University in Japan is gratefully acknowledged for support to Dr Fujisawa.

Sources of Funding

This research was supported by the Chief Scientist Office (CZB/4/812), and the British Heart Foundation through Intermediate (FS/16/4/31831) and Senior (FS/16/14/32023) Research Fellowships and through a Cardiovascular Regenerative Medicine Centre Award (RE/18/5/34216) and Research Excellence Award (RE/18/5/34216).

Disclosures

None.
  5 in total

1.  Origins of circulating endothelial cells and endothelial outgrowth from blood.

Authors:  Y Lin; D J Weisdorf; A Solovey; R P Hebbel
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 14.808

2.  Redefining endothelial progenitor cells via clonal analysis and hematopoietic stem/progenitor cell principals.

Authors:  Mervin C Yoder; Laura E Mead; Daniel Prater; Theresa R Krier; Karim N Mroueh; Fang Li; Rachel Krasich; Constance J Temm; Josef T Prchal; David A Ingram
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  Late outgrowth endothelial cells resemble mature endothelial cells and are not derived from bone marrow.

Authors:  Olga Tura; Elizabeth M Skinner; G Robin Barclay; Kay Samuel; Ronald C J Gallagher; Mairi Brittan; Patrick W F Hadoke; David E Newby; Marc L Turner; Nicholas L Mills
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 6.277

Review 4.  Discrepancies in autologous bone marrow stem cell trials and enhancement of ejection fraction (DAMASCENE): weighted regression and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alexandra N Nowbar; Michael Mielewczik; Maria Karavassilis; Hakim-Moulay Dehbi; Matthew J Shun-Shin; Siana Jones; James P Howard; Graham D Cole; Darrel P Francis
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2014-04-28

5.  Single-cell transcriptome analyses reveal novel targets modulating cardiac neovascularization by resident endothelial cells following myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Ziwen Li; Emmanouil G Solomonidis; Marco Meloni; Richard S Taylor; Rodger Duffin; Ross Dobie; Marlene S Magalhaes; Beth E P Henderson; Pieter A Louwe; Gabriela D'Amico; Kairbaan M Hodivala-Dilke; Ajay M Shah; Nicholas L Mills; Benjamin D Simons; Gillian A Gray; Neil C Henderson; Andrew H Baker; Mairi Brittan
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 29.983

  5 in total
  20 in total

1.  A new method of culturing rat bone marrow endothelial progenitor cells in vitro.

Authors:  Zhaohong Kong; Meixin Chen; Jian Jiang; Jiang Zhu; Yumin Liu
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2020-10

2.  Single-cell transcriptional analysis of human endothelial colony-forming cells from patients with low VWF levels.

Authors:  Christopher J Ng; Alice Liu; Sujatha Venkataraman; Katrina J Ashworth; Christopher D Baker; Rebecca O'Rourke; Rajeev Vibhakar; Kenneth L Jones; Jorge Di Paola
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  Integrin α5 Is Regulated by miR-218-5p in Endothelial Progenitor Cells.

Authors:  Jialing Liu; Yi Li; Lingna Lyu; Liang Xiao; Aliza A Memon; Xin Yu; Arvin Halim; Shivani Patel; Abdikheyre Osman; Wenqing Yin; Jie Jiang; Said Naini; Kenneth Lim; Aifeng Zhang; Jonathan D Williams; Ruth Koester; Kevin Z Qi; Quynh-Anh Fucci; Lai Ding; Steven Chang; Ankit Patel; Yutaro Mori; Advika Chaudhari; Aaron Bao; Jia Liu; Tzong-Shi Lu; Andrew Siedlecki
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 10.121

4.  Recommendations for nomenclature and definition of cell products intended for human cardiovascular use.

Authors:  Doris A Taylor; Lourdes Chacon-Alberty; Luiz C Sampaio; Mariana Gonzalez Del Hierro; Emerson C Perin; Fernanda C P Mesquita; Timothy D Henry; Jay H Traverse; Carl J Pepine; Joshua M Hare; Michael P Murphy; Phillip C Yang; Keith L March; Rachel W Vojvodic; Ray F Ebert; Roberto Bolli
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 13.081

5.  Human Endothelial Colony-Forming Cells.

Authors:  Juan M Melero-Martin
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 5.159

6.  Potential contribution of early endothelial progenitor cell (eEPC)-to-macrophage switching in the development of pulmonary plexogenic lesion.

Authors:  Feng-Jin Shao; Xiao-Ling Guo; Jia-Xue Xu; Rui Liu; Dan-Yue Li; Qing-Hao Li; Ting Zhou; Cun Fang; Xun Tan
Journal:  Respir Res       Date:  2022-10-23

Review 7.  The impact of different forms of exercise on endothelial progenitor cells in healthy populations.

Authors:  Panagiotis Ferentinos; Costas Tsakirides; Michelle Swainson; Adam Davison; Marrissa Martyn-St James; Theocharis Ispoglou
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2022-03-19       Impact factor: 3.346

Review 8.  Immune Cell Therapies to Improve Regeneration and Revascularization of Non-Healing Wounds.

Authors:  Elena Groppa; Andrea Colliva; Roman Vuerich; Tea Kocijan; Serena Zacchigna
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Acute Exercise-Induced Oxidative Stress Does Not Affect Immediate or Delayed Precursor Cell Mobilization in Healthy Young Males.

Authors:  Michelle Schmid; Hans-Jürgen Gruber; Julia M Kröpfl; Christina M Spengler
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 4.566

10.  Endothelial characteristics in healthy endothelial colony forming cells; generating a robust and valid ex vivo model for vascular disease.

Authors:  Suzan de Boer; Mackenzie Bowman; Colleen Notley; Aomei Mo; Patricia Lima; Annika de Jong; Richard Dirven; Ester Weijers; David Lillicrap; Paula James; Jeroen Eikenboom
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 5.824

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.