Yanyan Chen1, Ping Zhang2, Jinping Wang3, Qiuhong Gong1, Yali An1, Xin Qian1, Bo Zhang4, Hui Li3, Edward W Gregg5, Peter H Bennett6, Guangwei Li7,8. 1. Center of Endocrinology and Cardiovascular Metabolism, Fuwai Hospital, Beijing, China. 2. Division of Diabetes Translation, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA. 3. Department of Cardiology, Da Qing First Hospital, Da Qing, China. 4. Department of Endocrinology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China. 5. School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK. 6. Phoenix Epidemiology and Clinical Research Branch, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Phoenix, AZ, USA. 7. Center of Endocrinology and Cardiovascular Metabolism, Fuwai Hospital, Beijing, China. guangwei_li45@126.com. 8. Department of Endocrinology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China. guangwei_li45@126.com.
Abstract
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: We aimed to determine associations of regression to normal glucose tolerance (NGT), maintaining impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) or progression to diabetes with subsequent risks of CVD and microvascular disease among Chinese adults with IGT. METHODS: We conducted an observational study among 540 participants in the Da Qing Diabetes Prevention Study, a 6 year lifestyle intervention trial in people with IGT, defined by 1985 WHO criteria as fasting plasma glucose <7.8 mmol/l and 2 h post-load plasma glucose ≥7.8 and <11.1 mmol/l. At the end of the trial, the groups that had regressed to NGT, remained with IGT or progressed to diabetes were identified. Participants were then followed for 24 years after completion of the trial, during which we compared the incidence and hazard ratios for CVD and microvascular disease in each group and estimated the differences in their median time to onset from parametric Weibull distribution models. RESULTS: At the end of the 6 year trial, 252 (46.7%) participants had developed diabetes, 114 (21.1%) had remained with IGT and 174 (32.2%) had regressed to NGT. Compared with those who developed diabetes during the trial, the median time to onset of diabetes was delayed by 14.86 years (95% CI 12.49, 17.25) in the NGT and 9.87 years (95% CI 8.12, 11.68) in the IGT groups. After completion of the trial, among those with diabetes, IGT and NGT, the 24 year cumulative incidence of CVD was 64.5%, 48.5% and 45.1%, respectively, and 36.8%, 21.7% and 16.5% for microvascular diseases. Compared with participants who had progressed to diabetes during the trial, those who regressed to NGT had a 37% (HR 0.63; 95% CI 0.47, 0.85) reduction in CVD incidence and a median delay of 7.45 years (95% CI 1.91, 12.99) in onset, and those who remained with IGT had a 34% (HR 0.66; 95% CI 0.47, 0.91) lower CVD incidence with a median delay in onset of 5.69 years (95% CI 1.0, 10.38). Participants with NGT had a 66% (HR 0.34; 95% CI 0.20, 0.56) lower incidence of microvascular diseases and a median delay in the onset of 18.66 years (95% CI 6.08, 31.24), and those remaining with IGT had a 52% (HR 0.48; 95% CI 0.29, 0.81) lower incidence with a median delay of 12.56 years (95% CI 2.49, 22.63). CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: People with IGT who reverted to NGT or remained with IGT at the end of the 6 year trial subsequently had significantly lower incidences of CVD and microvascular disease than those who had developed diabetes.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: We aimed to determine associations of regression to normal glucose tolerance (NGT), maintaining impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) or progression to diabetes with subsequent risks of CVD and microvascular disease among Chinese adults with IGT. METHODS: We conducted an observational study among 540 participants in the Da Qing Diabetes Prevention Study, a 6 year lifestyle intervention trial in people with IGT, defined by 1985 WHO criteria as fasting plasma glucose <7.8 mmol/l and 2 h post-load plasma glucose ≥7.8 and <11.1 mmol/l. At the end of the trial, the groups that had regressed to NGT, remained with IGT or progressed to diabetes were identified. Participants were then followed for 24 years after completion of the trial, during which we compared the incidence and hazard ratios for CVD and microvascular disease in each group and estimated the differences in their median time to onset from parametric Weibull distribution models. RESULTS: At the end of the 6 year trial, 252 (46.7%) participants had developed diabetes, 114 (21.1%) had remained with IGT and 174 (32.2%) had regressed to NGT. Compared with those who developed diabetes during the trial, the median time to onset of diabetes was delayed by 14.86 years (95% CI 12.49, 17.25) in the NGT and 9.87 years (95% CI 8.12, 11.68) in the IGT groups. After completion of the trial, among those with diabetes, IGT and NGT, the 24 year cumulative incidence of CVD was 64.5%, 48.5% and 45.1%, respectively, and 36.8%, 21.7% and 16.5% for microvascular diseases. Compared with participants who had progressed to diabetes during the trial, those who regressed to NGT had a 37% (HR 0.63; 95% CI 0.47, 0.85) reduction in CVD incidence and a median delay of 7.45 years (95% CI 1.91, 12.99) in onset, and those who remained with IGT had a 34% (HR 0.66; 95% CI 0.47, 0.91) lower CVD incidence with a median delay in onset of 5.69 years (95% CI 1.0, 10.38). Participants with NGT had a 66% (HR 0.34; 95% CI 0.20, 0.56) lower incidence of microvascular diseases and a median delay in the onset of 18.66 years (95% CI 6.08, 31.24), and those remaining with IGT had a 52% (HR 0.48; 95% CI 0.29, 0.81) lower incidence with a median delay of 12.56 years (95% CI 2.49, 22.63). CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: People with IGT who reverted to NGT or remained with IGT at the end of the 6 year trial subsequently had significantly lower incidences of CVD and microvascular disease than those who had developed diabetes.
Authors: X R Pan; G W Li; Y H Hu; J X Wang; W Y Yang; Z X An; Z X Hu; J Lin; J Z Xiao; H B Cao; P A Liu; X G Jiang; Y Y Jiang; J P Wang; H Zheng; H Zhang; P H Bennett; B V Howard Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 1997-04 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: J Tuomilehto; J Lindström; J G Eriksson; T T Valle; H Hämäläinen; P Ilanne-Parikka; S Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi; M Laakso; A Louheranta; M Rastas; V Salminen; M Uusitupa Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2001-05-03 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: S L Edelstein; W C Knowler; R P Bain; R Andres; E L Barrett-Connor; G K Dowse; S M Haffner; D J Pettitt; J D Sorkin; D C Muller; V R Collins; R F Hamman Journal: Diabetes Date: 1997-04 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: William C Knowler; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Sarah E Fowler; Richard F Hamman; John M Lachin; Elizabeth A Walker; David M Nathan Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-02-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Qiuhong Gong; Ping Zhang; Jinping Wang; Yali An; Edward W Gregg; Hui Li; Bo Zhang; Ying Shuai; Wenying Yang; Yanyan Chen; Shuqian Liu; Michael M Engelgau; Yinghua Hu; Peter H Bennett; Guangwei Li Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2016-07-13 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Kamel Mohammedi; Mark Woodward; Michel Marre; Stephen Colagiuri; Mark Cooper; Stephen Harrap; Giuseppe Mancia; Neil Poulter; Bryan Williams; Sophia Zoungas; John Chalmers Journal: Cardiovasc Diabetol Date: 2017-07-27 Impact factor: 9.951
Authors: Jack R W Brownrigg; Cian O Hughes; David Burleigh; Alan Karthikesalingam; Benjamin O Patterson; Peter J Holt; Matthew M Thompson; Simon de Lusignan; Kausik K Ray; Robert J Hinchliffe Journal: Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol Date: 2016-05-20 Impact factor: 32.069