Literature DB >> 33608609

Avoiding gauge ambiguities in cavity quantum electrodynamics.

Dominic M Rouse1, Brendon W Lovett2, Erik M Gauger3, Niclas Westerberg4,5.   

Abstract

Systems of interacting charges and fields are ubiquitous in physics. Recently, it has been shown that Hamiltonians derived using different gauges can yield different physical results when matter degrees of freedom are truncated to a few low-lying energy eigenstates. This effect is particularly prominent in the ultra-strong coupling regime. Such ambiguities arise because transformations reshuffle the partition between light and matter degrees of freedom and so level truncation is a gauge dependent approximation. To avoid this gauge ambiguity, we redefine the electromagnetic fields in terms of potentials for which the resulting canonical momenta and Hamiltonian are explicitly unchanged by the gauge choice of this theory. Instead the light/matter partition is assigned by the intuitive choice of separating an electric field between displacement and polarisation contributions. This approach is an attractive choice in typical cavity quantum electrodynamics situations.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33608609      PMCID: PMC7896096          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-83214-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  19 in total

1.  Strong atom-field coupling for Bose-Einstein condensates in an optical cavity on a chip.

Authors:  Yves Colombe; Tilo Steinmetz; Guilhem Dubois; Felix Linke; David Hunger; Jakob Reichel
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Observation of the Bloch-Siegert shift in a qubit-oscillator system in the ultrastrong coupling regime.

Authors:  P Forn-Díaz; J Lisenfeld; D Marcos; J J García-Ripoll; E Solano; C J P M Harmans; J E Mooij
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 9.161

3.  Coupling a single trapped atom to a nanoscale optical cavity.

Authors:  J D Thompson; T G Tiecke; N P de Leon; J Feist; A V Akimov; M Gullans; A S Zibrov; V Vuletić; M D Lukin
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Nanophotonic quantum phase switch with a single atom.

Authors:  T G Tiecke; J D Thompson; N P de Leon; L R Liu; V Vuletić; M D Lukin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Terahertz Light-Matter Interaction beyond Unity Coupling Strength.

Authors:  Andreas Bayer; Marcel Pozimski; Simon Schambeck; Dieter Schuh; Rupert Huber; Dominique Bougeard; Christoph Lange
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 11.189

6.  Perspective: Quantum Hamiltonians for optical interactions.

Authors:  David L Andrews; Garth A Jones; A Salam; R Guy Woolley
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2018-01-28       Impact factor: 3.488

7.  Avoiding gauge ambiguities in cavity quantum electrodynamics.

Authors:  Dominic M Rouse; Brendon W Lovett; Erik M Gauger; Niclas Westerberg
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  The quantum-optics Hamiltonian in the Multipolar gauge.

Authors:  Emmanuel Rousseau; Didier Felbacq
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Gauge ambiguities imply Jaynes-Cummings physics remains valid in ultrastrong coupling QED.

Authors:  Adam Stokes; Ahsan Nazir
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  1 in total

1.  Avoiding gauge ambiguities in cavity quantum electrodynamics.

Authors:  Dominic M Rouse; Brendon W Lovett; Erik M Gauger; Niclas Westerberg
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 4.379

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.