Literature DB >> 33608588

Decision theory for precision therapy of breast cancer.

Michael Kenn1, Dan Cacsire Castillo-Tong2, Christian F Singer2, Rudolf Karch1, Michael Cibena1, Heinz Koelbl3, Wolfgang Schreiner4.   

Abstract

Correctly estimating the hormone receptor status for estrogen (ER) and progesterone (PGR) is crucial for precision therapy of breast cancer. It is known that conventional diagnostics (immunohistochemistry, IHC) yields a significant rate of wrongly diagnosed receptor status. Here we demonstrate how Dempster Shafer decision Theory (DST) enhances diagnostic precision by adding information from gene expression. We downloaded data of 3753 breast cancer patients from Gene Expression Omnibus. Information from IHC and gene expression was fused according to DST, and the clinical criterion for receptor positivity was re-modelled along DST. Receptor status predicted according to DST was compared with conventional assessment via IHC and gene-expression, and deviations were flagged as questionable. The survival of questionable cases turned out significantly worse (Kaplan Meier p < 1%) than for patients with receptor status confirmed by DST, indicating a substantial enhancement of diagnostic precision via DST. This study is not only relevant for precision medicine but also paves the way for introducing decision theory into OMICS data science.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33608588      PMCID: PMC7895957          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-82418-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  68 in total

1.  A comparison of normalization methods for high density oligonucleotide array data based on variance and bias.

Authors:  B M Bolstad; R A Irizarry; M Astrand; T P Speed
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2003-01-22       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Pathological Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Trastuzumab Is Dependent on HER2/CEP17 Ratio in HER2-Amplified Early Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Christian F Singer; Yen Y Tan; Florian Fitzal; Guenther G Steger; Daniel Egle; Angelika Reiner; Margaretha Rudas; Farid Moinfar; Christine Gruber; Edgar Petru; Rupert Bartsch; Kristina A Tendl; David Fuchs; Michael Seifert; Ruth Exner; Marija Balic; Zsuzsanna Bago-Horvath; Martin Filipits; Michael Gnant
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 3.  Reuse of public genome-wide gene expression data.

Authors:  Johan Rung; Alvis Brazma
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 4.  Use of Biomarkers to Guide Decisions on Adjuvant Systemic Therapy for Women With Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline.

Authors:  Lyndsay N Harris; Nofisat Ismaila; Lisa M McShane; Fabrice Andre; Deborah E Collyar; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo; Elizabeth H Hammond; Nicole M Kuderer; Minetta C Liu; Robert G Mennel; Catherine Van Poznak; Robert C Bast; Daniel F Hayes
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 5.  Statistical challenges in preprocessing in microarray experiments in cancer.

Authors:  Kouros Owzar; William T Barry; Sin-Ho Jung; Insuk Sohn; Stephen L George
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  A review of statistical methods for preprocessing oligonucleotide microarrays.

Authors:  Zhijin Wu
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.021

7.  TNBCtype: A Subtyping Tool for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Xi Chen; Jiang Li; William H Gray; Brian D Lehmann; Joshua A Bauer; Yu Shyr; Jennifer A Pietenpol
Journal:  Cancer Inform       Date:  2012-07-24

8.  Genomic Grade Index (GGI): feasibility in routine practice and impact on treatment decisions in early breast cancer.

Authors:  Otto Metzger-Filho; Aurélie Catteau; Stefan Michiels; Marc Buyse; Michail Ignatiadis; Kamal S Saini; Evandro de Azambuja; Virginie Fasolo; Sihem Naji; Jean Luc Canon; Paul Delrée; Michel Coibion; Pino Cusumano; Veronique Jossa; Jean Pierre Kains; Denis Larsimont; Vincent Richard; Daniel Faverly; Nathalie Cornez; Peter Vuylsteke; Brigitte Vanderschueren; Hélène Peyro-Saint-Paul; Martine Piccart; Christos Sotiriou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A network module-based method for identifying cancer prognostic signatures.

Authors:  Guanming Wu; Lincoln Stein
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 13.583

10.  Staging of prostate cancer using automatic feature selection, sampling and Dempster-Shafer fusion.

Authors:  Sandeep Chandana; Henry Leung; Kiril Trpkov
Journal:  Cancer Inform       Date:  2009-02-03
View more
  1 in total

1.  Decision Theory versus Conventional Statistics for Personalized Therapy of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Michael Kenn; Rudolf Karch; Dan Cacsire Castillo-Tong; Christian F Singer; Heinz Koelbl; Wolfgang Schreiner
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-04-02
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.