Literature DB >> 33607995

A validation study of the Korean version of the Toronto empathy questionnaire for the measurement of medical students' empathy.

Sanghee Yeo1, Kyong-Jee Kim2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to validate the Korean version of the Toronto Empathy Questionnaire (TEQ) and to determine its suitability for the measurement of empathy in medical students.
METHODS: The study sample was Year 1 and 2 medical students at two medical schools on six-year undergraduate medical programs in South Korea. The study participants completed the Korean TEQ, which has a single factor structure and consists of 16 items; responses are scored using a 5-point Likert scale, giving a maximum possible score of 64. Psychometric validation of the questionnaire was performed by exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses and the goodness of fit test. Average variance extracted was calculated to establish convergent validity, and associations between factors and construct reliability were analyzed to establish discriminant validity. Cronbach's alpha values were utilized for reliability analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 279 students completed and returned the questionnaire (a 96.2% response rate). Participant empathy scores ranged from 20 to 60 (M = 44.6, SD = 7.36). Empathy scores were higher for females than males (p < .05). The cumulative variance of the Korean TEQ was 32%, indicating that its explanatory power was rather weak. Consequently, goodness-of-fit testing was performed on four hypothetical models, among which a three-factorial structure consisting of 14 items demonstrated satisfactory fit indices and explained 55% of the variance. Reliability estimates of the three subscales were also satisfactory (Cronbach's α = .71-.81). This three-factorial model was validated by confirmatory factor analysis and demonstrated adequate convergent and discriminant validity.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated psychometric validation of the Korean TEQ for measuring medical students' empathy. We suggest a modified 14-item model with a three-factorial structure, which demonstrated better psychometric properties than the original scale.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empathy; Medical student; Psychometrics; Toronto empathy questionnaire

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33607995      PMCID: PMC7893770          DOI: 10.1186/s12909-021-02561-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Med Educ        ISSN: 1472-6920            Impact factor:   2.463


  21 in total

1.  Comparing a self-administered measure of empathy with observed behavior among medical students.

Authors:  Daniel C R Chen; M Elaine Pahilan; Jay D Orlander
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Measuring Medical Students' Empathy: Exploring the Underlying Constructs of and Associations Between Two Widely Used Self-Report Instruments in Five Countries.

Authors:  Patrício Costa; Marco Antonio de Carvalho-Filho; Marcelo Schweller; Pia Thiemann; Ana Salgueira; John Benson; Manuel João Costa; Thelma Quince
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 6.893

3.  Empathy in Korean medical students: Findings from a nationwide survey.

Authors:  Kyung Hye Park; Hyerin Roh; Dae Hun Suh; Mohammadreza Hojat
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 3.650

4.  Empathy is related to clinical competence in medical care.

Authors:  Jessica Ogle; John A Bushnell; Peter Caputi
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 6.251

5.  Empathy and quality of care.

Authors:  Stewart W Mercer; William J Reynolds
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  What Matters More About the Interpersonal Reactivity Index and the Jefferson Scale of Empathy? Their Underlying Constructs or Their Relationships With Pertinent Measures of Clinical Competence and Patient Outcomes?

Authors:  Mohammadreza Hojat; Joseph S Gonnella
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 6.893

7.  Medical students' self-reported empathy and simulated patients' assessments of student empathy: an analysis by gender and ethnicity.

Authors:  Katherine Berg; Joseph F Majdan; Dale Berg; Jon Veloski; Mohammadreza Hojat
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 6.893

8.  Physicians' empathy and clinical outcomes for diabetic patients.

Authors:  Mohammadreza Hojat; Daniel Z Louis; Fred W Markham; Richard Wender; Carol Rabinowitz; Joseph S Gonnella
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 6.893

Review 9.  Effectiveness of empathy in general practice: a systematic review.

Authors:  Frans Derksen; Jozien Bensing; Antoine Lagro-Janssen
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 5.386

10.  Validation of the Toronto Empathy Questionnaire (TEQ) Among Medical Students in China: Analyses Using Three Psychometric Methods.

Authors:  Richard Huan Xu; Eliza Lai-Yi Wong; Sabrina Yu-Jun Lu; Ling-Ming Zhou; Jing-Hui Chang; Dong Wang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-04-28
View more
  2 in total

1.  Validation of the Romanian Version of the Toronto Empathy Questionnaire (TEQ) among Undergraduate Medical Students.

Authors:  Sorin Ursoniu; Costela Lacrimioara Serban; Catalina Giurgi-Oncu; Ioana Alexandra Rivis; Adina Bucur; Ana-Cristina Bredicean; Ion Papava
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Psychometric Analysis of the Czech Version of the Toronto Empathy Questionnaire.

Authors:  Lukas Novak; Klara Malinakova; Petr Mikoska; Jitse P van Dijk; Filip Dechterenko; Radek Ptacek; Peter Tavel
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.