Literature DB >> 34948481

Validation of the Romanian Version of the Toronto Empathy Questionnaire (TEQ) among Undergraduate Medical Students.

Sorin Ursoniu1, Costela Lacrimioara Serban1, Catalina Giurgi-Oncu2, Ioana Alexandra Rivis3, Adina Bucur1, Ana-Cristina Bredicean2,4, Ion Papava2.   

Abstract

Medical professionals require adequate abilities to identify others' emotions and express personal emotions. We aimed to determine the validity and reliability of an empathy measuring tool in medical students for this study. We employed Spreng's Toronto Empathy Questionnaire (TEQ) as a starting point for this validation. The process was performed in several steps, including an English-Romanian-English translation and a focus group meeting to establish each question's degree of understandability and usability, with minor improvements of wording in each step. We checked internal and external consistency in a pilot group (n = 67). For construct and convergent validity, we used a sample of 649 students. The overall internal and external reliability performed well, with Cronbach's alpha = 0.727 and respective ICC = 0.776. The principal component analysis resulted in 3 components: prosocial helping behavior, inappropriate sensitivity, dismissive attitude. Component 1 includes positively worded questions, and components 2 and 3 include negatively worded questions. Women had significantly higher scores than men in convergent validity, but we did not highlight any differences for other demographic factors. The Romanian version of the TEQ is a reliable and valid tool to measure empathy among undergraduate medical students that may be further used in subsequent research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Toronto empathy questionnaire (TEQ); empathy; medical students; validation

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34948481      PMCID: PMC8701033          DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182412871

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health        ISSN: 1660-4601            Impact factor:   3.390


  32 in total

1.  Empathic concern and professional characteristics associated with clinical empathy in French general practitioners.

Authors:  Sophie Lelorain; Serge Sultan; Franck Zenasni; Annie Catu-Pinault; Philippe Jaury; Emilie Boujut; Laurent Rigal
Journal:  Eur J Gen Pract       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 1.904

2.  Comparative fit indexes in structural models.

Authors:  P M Bentler
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  Empathy and feelings of guilt experienced by nurses: A cross-sectional study of their role in burnout and compassion fatigue symptoms.

Authors:  Joana Duarte; José Pinto-Gouveia
Journal:  Appl Nurs Res       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 2.257

4.  Empathy-related Responding: Associations with Prosocial Behavior, Aggression, and Intergroup Relations.

Authors:  Nancy Eisenberg; Natalie D Eggum; Laura Di Giunta
Journal:  Soc Issues Policy Rev       Date:  2010-12-01

Review 5.  Culture and nonverbal expressions of empathy in clinical settings: A systematic review.

Authors:  Áine Lorié; Diego A Reinero; Margot Phillips; Linda Zhang; Helen Riess
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2016-09-25

6.  The complexity of empathy during medical school training: evidence for positive changes.

Authors:  Karen E Smith; Greg J Norman; Jean Decety
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 6.251

7.  Empathy among undergraduate medical students: A cross-sectional study in one Malaysian public medical school.

Authors:  Mainul Haque; Bidyadhar Sa; Md Anwarul Azim Majumder; Md Zakirul Islam; Nur Syamirah Aishah Binti Othman; Siti Nur Najihah Binti Lutfi; Golam Mohammad Kibria; Abdus Salam; Mohd Hafizi Ismail; Shahidah Leong Abdullah
Journal:  Ann Afr Med       Date:  2018 Oct-Dec

8.  From "Einfühlung" to empathy: exploring the relationship between aesthetic and interpersonal experience.

Authors:  Joanna Ganczarek; Thomas Hünefeldt; Marta Olivetti Belardinelli
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2018-05-15

9.  Influences on students' empathy in medical education: an exploratory interview study with medical students in their third and last year.

Authors:  N J Pohontsch; A Stark; M Ehrhardt; T Kötter; M Scherer
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 2.463

10.  Psychometric Analysis of the Czech Version of the Toronto Empathy Questionnaire.

Authors:  Lukas Novak; Klara Malinakova; Petr Mikoska; Jitse P van Dijk; Filip Dechterenko; Radek Ptacek; Peter Tavel
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.