| Literature DB >> 34948481 |
Sorin Ursoniu1, Costela Lacrimioara Serban1, Catalina Giurgi-Oncu2, Ioana Alexandra Rivis3, Adina Bucur1, Ana-Cristina Bredicean2,4, Ion Papava2.
Abstract
Medical professionals require adequate abilities to identify others' emotions and express personal emotions. We aimed to determine the validity and reliability of an empathy measuring tool in medical students for this study. We employed Spreng's Toronto Empathy Questionnaire (TEQ) as a starting point for this validation. The process was performed in several steps, including an English-Romanian-English translation and a focus group meeting to establish each question's degree of understandability and usability, with minor improvements of wording in each step. We checked internal and external consistency in a pilot group (n = 67). For construct and convergent validity, we used a sample of 649 students. The overall internal and external reliability performed well, with Cronbach's alpha = 0.727 and respective ICC = 0.776. The principal component analysis resulted in 3 components: prosocial helping behavior, inappropriate sensitivity, dismissive attitude. Component 1 includes positively worded questions, and components 2 and 3 include negatively worded questions. Women had significantly higher scores than men in convergent validity, but we did not highlight any differences for other demographic factors. The Romanian version of the TEQ is a reliable and valid tool to measure empathy among undergraduate medical students that may be further used in subsequent research.Entities:
Keywords: Toronto empathy questionnaire (TEQ); empathy; medical students; validation
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34948481 PMCID: PMC8701033 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182412871
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390