OBJECTIVES: Phonation threshold pressure (PTP) and phonation threshold flow (PTF) are useful aerodynamic parameters, but each is sensitive to different disorders. A single comprehensive aerodynamic parameter sensitive to a variety of disorders might be beneficial in quantitative voice assessment. We performed the first study of phonation threshold power (PTW) in human subjects. METHODS: PTP and PTF were measured in 100 normal subjects, 19 subjects with vocal fold immobility, and 94 subjects with a benign mass lesion. PTW was calculated from these two parameters. In 41 subjects with a polyp, measurements were obtained before and after excision. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to determine the ability of the three parameters to distinguish between controls and disordered groups. RESULTS: The PTW (p < 0.001), PTP (p < 0.001), and PTF (p < 0.001) were different among the three groups. All parameters decreased after polyp excision. PTW had the highest area under the ROC curve for all analyses. CONCLUSIONS: PTW is sensitive to the presence of mass lesions and vocal fold mobility disorders. Additionally, changes in PTW can be observed after excision of mass lesions. PTW could be a useful parameter to describe the aerodynamic inputs to voice production.
OBJECTIVES: Phonation threshold pressure (PTP) and phonation threshold flow (PTF) are useful aerodynamic parameters, but each is sensitive to different disorders. A single comprehensive aerodynamic parameter sensitive to a variety of disorders might be beneficial in quantitative voice assessment. We performed the first study of phonation threshold power (PTW) in human subjects. METHODS: PTP and PTF were measured in 100 normal subjects, 19 subjects with vocal fold immobility, and 94 subjects with a benign mass lesion. PTW was calculated from these two parameters. In 41 subjects with a polyp, measurements were obtained before and after excision. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to determine the ability of the three parameters to distinguish between controls and disordered groups. RESULTS: The PTW (p < 0.001), PTP (p < 0.001), and PTF (p < 0.001) were different among the three groups. All parameters decreased after polyp excision. PTW had the highest area under the ROC curve for all analyses. CONCLUSIONS: PTW is sensitive to the presence of mass lesions and vocal fold mobility disorders. Additionally, changes in PTW can be observed after excision of mass lesions. PTW could be a useful parameter to describe the aerodynamic inputs to voice production.
Authors: Shigeru Hirano; Diane M Bless; Bernard Rousseau; Nathan Welham; Douglas Montequin; Roger W Chan; Charles N Ford Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 3.325
Authors: Rachel E Witt; Michael F Regner; Chao Tao; Adam L Rieves; Peiyun Zhuang; Jack J Jiang Journal: Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 1.547
Authors: Heidi Kletzien; Cameron L Macdonald; Jason Orne; David O Francis; Glen Leverson; Elizabeth Wendt; Rebecca S Sippel; Nadine P Connor Journal: JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2018-11-01 Impact factor: 6.223
Authors: Emke M J M van den Broek; Bas J Heijnen; Martine Hendriksma; Antonius P M Langeveld; Peter Paul G van Benthem; Elisabeth V Sjögren Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2019-03-11 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Carolin Elizabeth George; Gerhard Scheuch; Ulf Seifart; Leeberk Raja Inbaraj; Sindhulina Chandrasingh; Indu K Nair; Anthony J Hickey; Michael R Barer; Eve Fletcher; Rachel D Field; Jonathan Salzman; Nathan Moelis; Dennis Ausiello; David A Edwards Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-03-29 Impact factor: 4.379