Literature DB >> 33606759

Those who ignore the past are doomed…to be heartless: Lay historicist theory is associated with humane responses to the struggles and transgressions of others.

Michael J Gill1, Michael R Andreychik1, Phillip D Getty1.   

Abstract

When one learns that current struggles or transgressions of an individual or group are rooted in an unfortunate history, one experiences compassion and reduced blame. Prior research has demonstrated this by having participants receive (or not) a concrete historicist narrative regarding the particular individual or group under consideration. Here, we take a different approach. We explore the possibility that everyday people show meaningful variation in a broad lay theory that we call lay historicism. Lay historicists believe that-as a general fact-people's psychological characteristics and life outcomes are powerfully molded by their life histories. We present eight studies linking lay historicism to broad tendencies toward compassion and non-blaming. Collectively, Studies 1-5 suggest that lay historicism affects compassion and blame, respectively, via distinct mechanisms: (1) Lay historicism is associated with compassion because it creates a sense that-as a general fact-past suffering lies behind present difficulties, and (2) lay historicism is associated with blame mitigation because historicists reject the idea that-as a general fact-people freely and autonomously create their moral character. Thus, lay historicism increases compassion and decreases blame via distinct mechanisms. The remaining studies diversify our evidence base. Study 6 examines criminal justice philosophies rather than broad moral traits (as in the earlier studies) and shows that lay historicism is associated with preference for humane criminal justice philosophies. Study 7 moves from abstract beliefs to concrete situations and shows that lay historicism predicts reduced blaming of an irresponsible peer who is encountered face-to-face. One additional study-in our Supplemental Materials-shows that lay historicism predicts lower levels of blaming on implicit measures, although only among those who also reject lay controllability theories. Overall, these studies provide consistent support for the possibility that lay historicism is broadly associated with humane responding to the struggles and transgressions of others.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33606759      PMCID: PMC7894831          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246882

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  21 in total

1.  Measuring individual and cultural differences in implicit trait theories.

Authors:  A Timothy Church; Fernando A Ortiz; Marcia S Katigbak; Tatyana V Avdeyeva; Alice M Emerson; José de Jesús Vargas Flores; Joselina Ibáñez Reyes
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2003-08

Review 2.  Compassion: an evolutionary analysis and empirical review.

Authors:  Jennifer L Goetz; Dacher Keltner; Emiliana Simon-Thomas
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  Implicit theories of emotion: affective and social outcomes across a major life transition.

Authors:  Maya Tamir; Oliver P John; Sanjay Srivastava; James J Gross
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2007-04

4.  God is watching you: priming God concepts increases prosocial behavior in an anonymous economic game.

Authors:  Azim F Shariff; Ara Norenzayan
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2007-09

5.  Ingroup identity moderates the impact of social explanations on intergroup attitudes: external explanations are not inherently prosocial.

Authors:  Michael R Andreychik; Michael J Gill
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2009-08-31

6.  Lay dispositionism and implicit theories of personality.

Authors:  C Y Chiu; Y Y Hong; C S Dweck
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1997-07

7.  Addressing the empathy deficit: beliefs about the malleability of empathy predict effortful responses when empathy is challenging.

Authors:  Karina Schumann; Jamil Zaki; Carol S Dweck
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2014-09

8.  Causal Conceptions in Social Explanation and Moral Evaluation: A Historical Tour.

Authors:  Mark D Alicke; David R Mandel; Denis J Hilton; Tobias Gerstenberg; David A Lagnado
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2015-11

9.  Asymmetric morality: Blame is more differentiated and more extreme than praise.

Authors:  Steve Guglielmo; Bertram F Malle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The Social Explanatory Styles Questionnaire: assessing moderators of basic social-cognitive phenomena including spontaneous trait inference, the fundamental attribution error, and moral blame.

Authors:  Michael J Gill; Michael R Andreychik
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.