Literature DB >> 31032666

Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Clinical Grading in Medical School.

Daniel Low1, Samantha W Pollack2, Zachary C Liao3, Ramoncita Maestas4, Larry E Kirven5, Anne M Eacker6, Leo S Morales7.   

Abstract

Phenomenon: Performance during the clinical phase of medical school is associated with membership in the Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Medical Society, competitiveness for highly selective residency specialties, and career advancement. Although race/ethnicity has been found to be associated with clinical grades during medical school, it remains unclear whether other factors such as performance on standardized tests account for racial/ethnic differences in clinical grades. Identifying the root causes of grading disparities during the clinical phase of medical school is important because of its long-term impacts on the career advancement of students of color. Approach: To evaluate the association between race/ethnicity and clinical grading, we examined Medical Student Performance Evaluation (MSPE) summary words (Outstanding, Excellent, Very Good, Good) and 3rd-year clerkship grades among medical students at the University of Washington School of Medicine. The analysis included data from July 2010 to June 2015. Medical students were categorized as White, underrepresented minorities (URM), and non-URM minorities. Associations between MSPE summary words and clerkship grades with race/ethnicity were assessed using ordinal logistic regression models. Findings: Students who identified as White or female, students who were younger in age, and students with higher United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 scores or final clerkship written exam scores consistently received higher final clerkship grades. Non-URM minority students were more likely than White students (Adjusted Odds Ratio = 0.53), confidence interval [0.36, 0.76], p = .001, to receive a lower category MSPE summary word in analyses adjusting for student demographics (age, gender, maternal education), year, and United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 scores. Similarly, in four of six required clerkships, grading disparities (p < .05) were found to favor White students over either URM or non-URM minority students. In all analyses, after accounting for all available confounding variables, grading disparities favored White students. Insights: This single institution study is among the first to document racial/ethnic disparities in MSPE summary words and clerkship grades while accounting for clinical clerkship final written examinations. A national focus on grading disparities in medical school is needed to understand the scope of this problem and to identify causes and possible remedies.

Keywords:  bias; clerkships; ethnicity; grading; medical school; race

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31032666     DOI: 10.1080/10401334.2019.1597724

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Teach Learn Med        ISSN: 1040-1334            Impact factor:   2.414


  27 in total

1.  Racial Privilege and Medical Student Awards: Addressing Racial Disparities in Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Society Membership.

Authors:  Dowin Boatright; Patrick G O'Connor; Jennifer E Miller
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Enhancing Diversity in the Ophthalmology Workforce.

Authors:  Fasika A Woreta; Lynn K Gordon; O'Rese J Knight; Jessica D Randolph; Nazlee Zebardast; César E Pérez-González
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 14.277

3.  Student ethnicity predicts social learning experiences, self-regulatory focus and grades.

Authors:  Chantal E E van Andel; Marise P Born; Walter W van den Broek; Karen M Stegers-Jager
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 7.647

4.  Increasing Diversity in Residency Training Programs.

Authors:  Kundai Crites; Jasmine Johnson; Nicole Scott; Anthony Shanks
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-06-15

5.  Improving Diversity in Pediatric Residency Selection: Using an Equity Framework to Implement Holistic Review.

Authors:  Jyothi Marbin; Glenn Rosenbluth; Rachel Brim; Edward Cruz; Alma Martinez; Margaret McNamara
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2021-02-25

6.  A Policy Statement of the Society of General Internal Medicine on Tackling Racism in Medical Education: Reflections on the Past and a Call to Action for the Future.

Authors:  Eloho Ufomata; Sarah Merriam; Aditi Puri; Katherine Lupton; Darlene LeFrancois; Danielle Jones; Attila Nemeth; Laura K Snydman; Rachel Stark; Carla Spagnoletti
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Medical School to Residency: How Can We Trust the Process?

Authors:  Gary L Beck Dallaghan; Irene Alexandraki; Jennifer Christner; Meg Keeley; Sorabh Khandelwal; Beat Steiner; Paul A Hemmer
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-04-14

8.  What Just Happened? The NRMP 2020-2030: A Speculative Fiction.

Authors:  Adam S Cifu; Jason T Alexander; Sarah L Stein
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2021-06-14

9.  Medical student perceptions of assessment systems, subjectivity, and variability on introductory dermatology clerkships.

Authors:  Jaewon Yoon; Jordan T Said; Leah L Thompson; Gabriel E Molina; Jeremy B Richards; Steven T Chen
Journal:  Int J Womens Dermatol       Date:  2021-01-13

Review 10.  Current Orthopaedic Residency Letters of Recommendation Are Not Biased by Gender of Applicant.

Authors:  Shaina A Lipa; Nattaly E Greene; Hai V Le; Augustus A White; Mark C Gebhardt; George S M Dyer
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2021-07-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.