Literature DB >> 17268927

Documenting the rationale and psychometric characteristics of patient reported outcomes for labeling and promotional claims: the PRO Evidence Dossier.

Dennis A Revicki1, Ari Gnanasakthy, Kevin Weinfurt.   

Abstract

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMEA) are willing to consider including information on patient reported outcomes (PROs) in product labeling and advertising. Pharmaceutical industry researchers must provide sufficient evidence supporting PRO benefit before an approval may be granted. This report describes the purpose and content of a PRO Evidence Dossier, which consists of important information supporting PRO claims. The dossier should be completed by pharmaceutical industry or other researchers to document the planning of the PRO assessment strategy, psychometric evidence, desired target labeling statements, and the clinical trial evidence of PRO benefits. The systematic reporting and documentation of information on the rationale for including PROs, rationale for the selection of specific PRO instruments, evidence on the psychometric qualities of the PRO measures, and guidelines for interpreting PRO findings will facilitate achieving a PRO labeling or promotional claim. Combining all the relevant information into a single document will facilitate the review and evaluation process for clinical and regulatory reviewers. The PRO Evidence Dossier may also be helpful to industry and academic researchers in identifying further information that will need to be developed to support the clinical development program and the PRO endpoints.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17268927     DOI: 10.1007/s11136-006-9153-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  16 in total

Review 1.  Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: attributes and review criteria.

Authors:  Neil Aaronson; Jordi Alonso; Audrey Burnam; Kathleen N Lohr; Donald L Patrick; Edward Perrin; Ruth E Stein
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 2.  Measuring treatment impact: a review of patient-reported outcomes and other efficacy endpoints in approved product labels.

Authors:  Richard J Willke; Laurie B Burke; Pennifer Erickson
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  2004-12

3.  Clinical significance of patient-reported questionnaire data: another step toward consensus.

Authors:  Jeff A Sloan; David Cella; Ron D Hays
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2005-10-13       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 4.  Health-related quality of life and other patient-reported outcomes in the European centralized drug regulatory process: a review of guidance documents and performed authorizations of medicinal products 1995 to 2003.

Authors:  Agota Szende; Nancy K Leidy; Dennis Revicki
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.725

5.  Recommendations for evaluating the validity of quality of life claims for labeling and promotion.

Authors:  N K Leidy; D A Revicki; B Genesté
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.725

6.  A self-complete measure of health status for chronic airflow limitation. The St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire.

Authors:  P W Jones; F H Quirk; C M Baveystock; P Littlejohns
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1992-06

7.  Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life. A conceptual model of patient outcomes.

Authors:  I B Wilson; P D Cleary
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-01-04       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 8.  Methods to explain the clinical significance of health status measures.

Authors:  Gordon H Guyatt; David Osoba; Albert W Wu; Kathleen W Wyrwich; Geoffrey R Norman
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 9.  Recommendations on health-related quality of life research to support labeling and promotional claims in the United States.

Authors:  D A Revicki; D Osoba; D Fairclough; I Barofsky; R Berzon; N K Leidy; M Rothman
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.440

10.  Responsiveness and minimal important differences for patient reported outcomes.

Authors:  Dennis A Revicki; David Cella; Ron D Hays; Jeff A Sloan; William R Lenderking; Neil K Aaronson
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2006-09-27       Impact factor: 3.186

View more
  20 in total

1.  [Concept and tools].

Authors:  Luis Lizán; Silvia Paz; Tatiana Dilla; Jose Manuel Rodríguez; Raquel Lahoz; Abilio Reig-Ferrer
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 1.137

2.  Qualitative research and content validity: developing best practices based on science and experience.

Authors:  Meryl Brod; Laura E Tesler; Torsten L Christensen
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-09-27       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 3.  ISOQOL recommends minimum standards for patient-reported outcome measures used in patient-centered outcomes and comparative effectiveness research.

Authors:  Bryce B Reeve; Kathleen W Wyrwich; Albert W Wu; Galina Velikova; Caroline B Terwee; Claire F Snyder; Carolyn Schwartz; Dennis A Revicki; Carol M Moinpour; Lori D McLeod; Jessica C Lyons; William R Lenderking; Pamela S Hinds; Ron D Hays; Joanne Greenhalgh; Richard Gershon; David Feeny; Peter M Fayers; David Cella; Michael Brundage; Sara Ahmed; Neil K Aaronson; Zeeshan Butt
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 4.  Reporting and interpretation of SF-36 outcomes in randomised trials: systematic review.

Authors:  Despina G Contopoulos-Ioannidis; Anastasia Karvouni; Ioanna Kouri; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-01-12

5.  Patient-recorded outcome to assess therapeutic efficacy in protoporphyria-induced dermal phototoxicity: a proposal.

Authors:  Elisabeth I Minder; Xiaoye Schneider-Yin; Christoph E Minder
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2010-06-21       Impact factor: 3.186

6.  Development and psychometric testing of the Hemophilia Well-being Index.

Authors:  Eduardo Remor
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2013-12

Review 7.  Patient-reported outcomes in vaccines research: relevance for decision-making.

Authors:  Desmond Curran; Eliazar Sabater Cabrera; Linda Nelsen
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Reliability, Validity and Responsiveness of the EQ-5D-5L in Assessing and Valuing Health Status in Adolescents and Young Adults with Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: a Randomized Controlled Trail.

Authors:  Judith Dams; Eline Rimane; Regina Steil; Babette Renneberg; Rita Rosner; Hans-Helmut König
Journal:  Psychiatr Q       Date:  2021-06

9.  Development of a Clinic Screening Tool to Identify Burdensome Health-Related Issues Affecting People Living With HIV in Spain.

Authors:  Maria José Fuster-RuizdeApodaca; Kelly Safreed-Harmon; Marta Pastor de la Cal; Ana Laguia; Denise Naniche; Jeffrey V Lazarus
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-06-09

10.  Development and preliminary validation of the pancreatic cancer disease impact score.

Authors:  Turid Heiberg; Tom Nordby; Tore K Kvien; Trond Buanes
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-01-13       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.