Literature DB >> 33606086

Patient-reported outcomes at 1 and 2 years after total hip and knee arthroplasty: what is the minimum required follow-up?

Nicolas S Piuzzi1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to test for differences between patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) at 1 and 2 years following total hip (THA) or knee (TKA) arthroplasty.
METHODS: Between 2015 and 2016, n = 469 and n = 414 patients underwent THA and TKA, respectively. Demographic and PROMs data were collected at 1 and 2 years post-operatively. PROMs included Veterans Rand 12-item (VR-12), Hip Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score (HOOS) Pain subscore, HOOS-Physical Function Short-form (HOOS-PS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score (KOOS) Pain subscore, and KOOS-Physical Function Short-form (KOOS-PS). Paired t tests assessed differences between groups. N = 298 (65.8%) and n = 240 (64%) patients followed-up at 1 year, and 205 (72% of 1-year responders) and 174 (76%) at 2 years in the THA and TKA cohorts, respectively.
RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were observed between 1 and 2 years for HOOS pain (p = 0.445), HOOS-PS (p = 0.265), VR-12 PCS (p = 0.239), VR-12 MCS scores (p = 0.342) in THA and TKA cohorts [KOOS pain (p = 0.242), KOOS-PS (p = 0.088), VR-12 PCS (p < 0.2757), VR-12 MCS scores (p < 0.075)]. There were statistically significant baseline differences between responders and non-responders (patients lost to follow-up), but differences were small and not clinically relevant. PROMs were not significantly different between 1- and 2-year time points for THA and TKA. Minimal demographic or baseline differences between responders and non-responders suggest a representative sample.
CONCLUSION: These data support a minimum follow-up of 1 year for studies with PROMs as the primary outcome variable following THA and TKA.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical outcomes study; Follow-up; Patient-reported outcomes; Total hip arthroplasty; Total knee arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33606086     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-021-03819-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   2.928


  10 in total

1.  Improving the response choices on the veterans SF-36 health survey role functioning scales: results from the Veterans Health Study.

Authors:  Lewis E Kazis; Donald R Miller; Jack A Clark; Katherine M Skinner; Austin Lee; Xinhua S Ren; Avron Spiro; William H Rogers; John E Ware
Journal:  J Ambul Care Manage       Date:  2004 Jul-Sep

2.  Equivalent Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores 12 and 24 Months After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Results From the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register.

Authors:  Kristian Samuelsson; Robert A Magnussen; Eduard Alentorn-Geli; Ferid Krupic; Kurt P Spindler; Christer Johansson; Magnus Forssblad; Jón Karlsson
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Knee osteoarthritis after meniscectomy: prevalence of radiographic changes after twenty-one years, compared with matched controls.

Authors:  H Roos; M Laurén; T Adalberth; E M Roos; K Jonsson; L S Lohmander
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1998-04

Review 4.  Alternative Payment Models in Total Joint Arthroplasty Under the Affordable Care Act.

Authors:  Zlatan Cizmic; David Novikov; James Feng; Richard Iorio; Morteza Meftah
Journal:  JBJS Rev       Date:  2019-03

5.  HCAHPS replaces Press Ganey survey as quality measure for patient hospital experience.

Authors:  Edie E Zusman
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.654

6.  No Difference in Outcomes 12 and 24 Months After Lower Extremity Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Prem N Ramkumar; Sergio M Navarro; Heather S Haeberle; Mitchell Ng; Nicolas S Piuzzi; Kurt P Spindler
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Applications of methodologies of the Veterans Health Study in the VA healthcare system: conclusions and summary.

Authors:  Lewis E Kazis; Donald R Miller; Katherine M Skinner; Austin Lee; Xinhua S Ren; Jack A Clark; William H Rogers; Avron Sprio; Alfredo Selim; Mark Linzer; Susan M C Payne; Dorcas Mansell; B Graeme Fincke
Journal:  J Ambul Care Manage       Date:  2006 Apr-Jun

8.  Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score. An extension of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index.

Authors:  Maria Klässbo; Eva Larsson; Eva Mannevik
Journal:  Scand J Rheumatol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.641

9.  Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - validation and comparison to the WOMAC in total knee replacement.

Authors:  Ewa M Roos; Sören Toksvig-Larsen
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2003-05-25       Impact factor: 3.186

10.  Patient-reported outcome measures in arthroplasty registries Report of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Working Group of the International Society of Arthroplasty Registries Part II. Recommendations for selection, administration, and analysis.

Authors:  Ola Rolfson; Eric Bohm; Patricia Franklin; Stephen Lyman; Geke Denissen; Jill Dawson; Jennifer Dunn; Kate Eresian Chenok; Michael Dunbar; Søren Overgaard; Göran Garellick; Anne Lübbeke
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 3.717

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Osteoarthritic Severity in Unresurfaced Patellae Does Not Adversely Affect Patient-reported Outcomes in Contemporary Primary TKA.

Authors:  Gregory J Schmidt; Hassan Farooq; Evan R Deckard; R Michael Meneghini
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev       Date:  2022-04-06
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.