Literature DB >> 29567000

No Difference in Outcomes 12 and 24 Months After Lower Extremity Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Prem N Ramkumar1, Sergio M Navarro2, Heather S Haeberle2, Mitchell Ng1, Nicolas S Piuzzi3, Kurt P Spindler1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A better understanding of how patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) change after total knee and hip arthroplasties (TKA and THA) is needed to support the minimum arbitrary follow-up of 24-months required by orthopedic journals. Therefore, our purpose was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the THA and TKA literature to determine if equivalence exists between 12- and 24-month outcomes data.
METHODS: A search was performed using the PubMed and EMBASE databases for primary and revision THA and TKA studies reporting PROMs data at both 12 and 24 months. Reports on PROMs for TKA and THAs were included for meta-analysis to detect statistical differences at 12 and 24 months.
RESULTS: A total of 15 reports from 9 TKA (n = 1564) and 6 THA (n = 740) reports were analyzed. The mean change between 12 and 24 months for Knee Society Score was 0.15 absolute points (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.97-1.06, P = .13) and for Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis index was 0.50 absolute points (95% CI: 0.94-1.07, P = .49). The mean change between 12 and 24 months for Harris Hip Score was 2.01 absolute points (95% CI: 0.94-1.1, P = .22) and for short form was 0.02 absolute points (95% CI: 0.92-1.08, P = .94).
CONCLUSION: No different outcomes were found within THA and TKA for 4 PROMs at 12- and 24-month follow-up. Although the findings from this study do not alleviate the need for collecting data from longer follow-up periods, there may not be additional value in collecting short-term outcomes data in routine practice at both 1 and 2 years.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PROM; arthroplasty; outcomes; total hip arthroplasty; total knee arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29567000     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  12 in total

1.  Total joint replacement improves pain, functional quality of life, and health utilities in patients with late-stage knee and hip osteoarthritis for up to 5 years.

Authors:  Audrey Neuprez; Arnaud Henri Neuprez; Jean-François Kaux; William Kurth; Christophe Daniel; Thierry Thirion; Jean-Pierre Huskin; Philippe Gillet; Olivier Bruyère; Jean-Yves Reginster
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 2.980

2.  A new robotically assisted technique can improve outcomes of total knee arthroplasty comparing to an imageless navigation system.

Authors:  Fabio Mancino; Stefano Marco Paolo Rossi; Rudy Sangaletti; Ludovico Lucenti; Flavio Terragnoli; Francesco Benazzo
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 2.928

3.  Early Outcomes of Scapholunate Injuries With Concomitant Distal Radius Fractures.

Authors:  Nicholas C Duethman; William R Aibinder; Nathaniel L Robinson; Steven L Moran; Sanjeev Kakar
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2019-12-09

4.  What Do Orthopaedists Believe is Needed for Incorporating Patient-reported Outcome Measures into Clinical Care? A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Robin R Whitebird; Leif I Solberg; Jeanette Y Ziegenfuss; Christine K Norton; Ella A Chrenka; Marc Swiontkowski; Megan Reams; Elizabeth S Grossman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 4.755

5.  Satisfaction and Functional Outcomes in Unicompartmental Compared with Total Knee Arthroplasty: Radiographically Matched Cohort Analysis.

Authors:  Kirsten Jansen; Mitchell Beckert; Evan R Deckard; Mary Ziemba-Davis; R Michael Meneghini
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2020-09-28

6.  Patient-reported outcomes at 1 and 2 years after total hip and knee arthroplasty: what is the minimum required follow-up?

Authors:  Nicolas S Piuzzi
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 2.928

7.  Which Preoperative Factors are Associated with Not Attaining Acceptable Levels of Pain and Function After TKA? Findings from an International Multicenter Study.

Authors:  James W Connelly; Vincent P Galea; Pakdee Rojanasopondist; Christian Skovgaard Nielsen; Charles R Bragdon; Andreas Kappel; James I Huddleston; Henrik Malchau; Anders Troelsen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 4.755

8.  Relationship between outcome scores and knee laxity following total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Andreas Kappel; Mogens Laursen; Poul T Nielsen; Anders Odgaard
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 3.717

9.  The effect of restored medial knee anatomy in total knee arthroplasty with the flexion first balancer technique on mid-flexion laxity and functional outcome.

Authors:  W A M van Lieshout; I van Oost; K L M Koenraadt; L H G J Elmans; R C I van Geenen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Patient-reported outcome measures in total joint arthroplasty: defining the optimal collection window.

Authors:  Michael Canfield; Lawrence Savoy; Mark P Cote; Mohamad J Halawi
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2019-11-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.