Gul Muhammad Baloch1, Sheela Sundarasen2, Karuthan Chinna1, Mohammad Nurunnabi2, Kamilah Kamaludin2, Heba Bakr Khoshaim3, Syed Far Abid Hossain4, Areej AlSukayt2. 1. School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Taylor's University, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia. 2. Department of Accounting, Prince Sultan University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. 3. Deanship of Admission and Registration, Prince Sultan University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. 4. College of Business Administration, International University of Business Agriculture and Technology, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: As of the present, the twenty-first century is experiencing what may be one of its most devastating events, in respect to infected and dead people by the virus. Now known to the world as COVID-19, the devastating disease of what has become a pandemic started its spread from Wuhan, China and swiftly engulfed the whole world with almost 11 million cases, in a span of around six months. It has not only increased the global burden of disease but has heavily dented many social institutions, including education. METHODS: This study investigates how the COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent measures of lockdown, quarantine, and social distancing have affected students. We look specifically into the effects on individuals' mental health, that is, the stress and anxiety levels of college and university students using the Zung Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS). RESULTS: Among 494 respondents, 61% were females, and the majority (77.3%) of the students were in the age group of 19-25 years. Among the respondents, 125 (25.3%), 45 (9.1%) and 34 (6.9%) experienced minimal to moderate, severe, and most extreme levels of anxiety, respectively. The variables of gender, age and year of study were significant at the 0.25 level by univariate analyses. Nevertheless, the ordinal regression indicates that only gender was significant. The odds of a female student being more anxious are higher compared to a male student (OR = 1.779, 95% CI [1.202-2.634], P = 0.004). The most prominent stressors attained from the qualitative feedback from the Pakistani students are associated with online teaching, concerns about their academic performance and completion of the current semester, uncertainty related to exam dates, and the status of the following semester. CONCLUSIONS: This study will add to the existing body of literature on the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the social and psychological health of students. The study outcomes will provide basic data for further applied and action research and a framework for universities and policy makers in Pakistan and the neighboring countries in the region with the same cultural contexts. Thus, relevant health interventions can be designed for better mental health and educational attainments of students from higher educational institutions. This pathological pandemic may well lead to another pandemic of mental and behavioral illness. All stakeholders should join force regardless of pre-existing differences and inequalities to ensure the well-being of future generations, specifically students from higher educational institutions. The long-lasting impacts and the aftermath of this pandemic will unquestionably need further and future investigations. Keywords: Anxiety, students, mental health, COVID-19, Pakistan.
BACKGROUND: As of the present, the twenty-first century is experiencing what may be one of its most devastating events, in respect to infected and dead people by the virus. Now known to the world as COVID-19, the devastating disease of what has become a pandemic started its spread from Wuhan, China and swiftly engulfed the whole world with almost 11 million cases, in a span of around six months. It has not only increased the global burden of disease but has heavily dented many social institutions, including education. METHODS: This study investigates how the COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent measures of lockdown, quarantine, and social distancing have affected students. We look specifically into the effects on individuals' mental health, that is, the stress and anxiety levels of college and university students using the Zung Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS). RESULTS: Among 494 respondents, 61% were females, and the majority (77.3%) of the students were in the age group of 19-25 years. Among the respondents, 125 (25.3%), 45 (9.1%) and 34 (6.9%) experienced minimal to moderate, severe, and most extreme levels of anxiety, respectively. The variables of gender, age and year of study were significant at the 0.25 level by univariate analyses. Nevertheless, the ordinal regression indicates that only gender was significant. The odds of a female student being more anxious are higher compared to a male student (OR = 1.779, 95% CI [1.202-2.634], P = 0.004). The most prominent stressors attained from the qualitative feedback from the Pakistani students are associated with online teaching, concerns about their academic performance and completion of the current semester, uncertainty related to exam dates, and the status of the following semester. CONCLUSIONS: This study will add to the existing body of literature on the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the social and psychological health of students. The study outcomes will provide basic data for further applied and action research and a framework for universities and policy makers in Pakistan and the neighboring countries in the region with the same cultural contexts. Thus, relevant health interventions can be designed for better mental health and educational attainments of students from higher educational institutions. This pathological pandemic may well lead to another pandemic of mental and behavioral illness. All stakeholders should join force regardless of pre-existing differences and inequalities to ensure the well-being of future generations, specifically students from higher educational institutions. The long-lasting impacts and the aftermath of this pandemic will unquestionably need further and future investigations. Keywords: Anxiety, students, mental health, COVID-19, Pakistan.
Authors: Gretchen A Brenes; Suzanne C Danhauer; Mary F Lyles; Patricia E Hogan; Michael E Miller Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: Bruce L Rollman; Bea Herbeck Belnap; Kaleab Z Abebe; Michael B Spring; Armando J Rotondi; Scott D Rothenberger; Jordan F Karp Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2018-01-01 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: Kate E Jones; Nikkita G Patel; Marc A Levy; Adam Storeygard; Deborah Balk; John L Gittleman; Peter Daszak Journal: Nature Date: 2008-02-21 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Samantha K Brooks; Rebecca K Webster; Louise E Smith; Lisa Woodland; Simon Wessely; Neil Greenberg; Gideon James Rubin Journal: Lancet Date: 2020-02-26 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Dina Di Giacomo; Alessandra Martelli; Federica Guerra; Federica Cielo; Jessica Ranieri Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-07-02 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Mehmood Ahmad; Bilal Mahmood Beg; Arfa Majeed; Sadaf Areej; Sualeha Riffat; Muhammad Adil Rasheed; Sammina Mahmood; Rana Muhammad Zahid Mushtaq; Mian Abdul Hafeez Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2021-04-14
Authors: Blanca Rosa García-Rivera; Jorge Luis García-Alcaraz; Ignacio Alejandro Mendoza-Martínez; Jesús Everardo Olguin-Tiznado; Pedro García-Alcaráz; Mónica Fernanda Aranibar; Claudia Camargo-Wilson Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-12-07 Impact factor: 3.390