Literature DB >> 33603642

Promoting Motor Variability During Robotic Assistance Enhances Motor Learning of Dynamic Tasks.

Özhan Özen1, Karin A Buetler1, Laura Marchal-Crespo1,2.   

Abstract

Despite recent advances in robot-assisted training, the benefits of haptic guidance on motor (re)learning are still limited. While haptic guidance may increase task performance during training, it may also decrease participants' effort and interfere with the perception of the environment dynamics, hindering somatosensory information crucial for motor learning. Importantly, haptic guidance limits motor variability, a factor considered essential for learning. We propose that Model Predictive Controllers (MPC) might be good alternatives to haptic guidance since they minimize the assisting forces and promote motor variability during training. We conducted a study with 40 healthy participants to investigate the effectiveness of MPCs on learning a dynamic task. The task consisted of swinging a virtual pendulum to hit incoming targets with the pendulum ball. The environment was haptically rendered using a Delta robot. We designed two MPCs: the first MPC-end-effector MPC-applied the optimal assisting forces on the end-effector. A second MPC-ball MPC-applied its forces on the virtual pendulum ball to further reduce the assisting forces. The participants' performance during training and learning at short- and long-term retention tests were compared to a control group who trained without assistance, and a group that trained with conventional haptic guidance. We hypothesized that the end-effector MPC would promote motor variability and minimize the assisting forces during training, and thus, promote learning. Moreover, we hypothesized that the ball MPC would enhance the performance and motivation during training but limit the motor variability and sense of agency (i.e., the feeling of having control over their movements), and therefore, limit learning. We found that the MPCs reduce the assisting forces compared to haptic guidance. Training with the end-effector MPC increases the movement variability and does not hinder the pendulum swing variability during training, ultimately enhancing the learning of the task dynamics compared to the other groups. Finally, we observed that increases in the sense of agency seemed to be associated with learning when training with the end-effector MPC. In conclusion, training with MPCs enhances motor learning of tasks with complex dynamics and are promising strategies to improve robotic training outcomes in neurological patients.
Copyright © 2021 Özen, Buetler and Marchal-Crespo.

Entities:  

Keywords:  effort; haptic rendering; model predictive controllers; motor learning; neurorehabilitation; robotic assistance; variability

Year:  2021        PMID: 33603642      PMCID: PMC7884323          DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2020.600059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Neurosci        ISSN: 1662-453X            Impact factor:   4.677


  40 in total

1.  The sense of agency during skill learning in individuals and dyads.

Authors:  Robrecht P R D van der Wel; Natalie Sebanz; Guenther Knoblich
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2012-04-25

2.  Central control of grasp: manipulation of objects with complex and simple dynamics.

Authors:  Theodore E Milner; David W Franklin; Hiroshi Imamizu; Mistuo Kawato
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-03-23       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Measuring handedness with questionnaires.

Authors:  M P Bryden
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Spatially Separating Haptic Guidance From Task Dynamics Through Wearable Devices.

Authors:  Evan Pezent; Simone Fani; Janelle Clark; Matteo Bianchi; Marcia K O'Malley
Journal:  IEEE Trans Haptics       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 2.487

Review 5.  Motor learning perspectives on haptic training for the upper extremities.

Authors:  Camille K Williams; Heather Carnahan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Haptics       Date:  2014 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.487

6.  The Task-Dependent Efficacy of Shared-Control Haptic Guidance Paradigms.

Authors:  D Powell; M K O'Malley
Journal:  IEEE Trans Haptics       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.487

7.  Temporal structure of motor variability is dynamically regulated and predicts motor learning ability.

Authors:  Howard G Wu; Yohsuke R Miyamoto; Luis Nicolas Gonzalez Castro; Bence P Ölveczky; Maurice A Smith
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-12       Impact factor: 24.884

8.  Virtual Reality Environments and Haptic Strategies to Enhance Implicit Learning and Motivation in Robot-Assisted Training.

Authors:  Fabio Bernardoni; Ozhan Ozen; Karin Buetler; Laura Marchal-Crespo
Journal:  IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot       Date:  2019-06

9.  Human control of complex objects: Towards more dexterous robots.

Authors:  Salah Bazzi; Dagmar Sternad
Journal:  Adv Robot       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 1.699

10.  Owning an overweight or underweight body: distinguishing the physical, experienced and virtual body.

Authors:  Ivelina V Piryankova; Hong Yu Wong; Sally A Linkenauger; Catherine Stinson; Matthew R Longo; Heinrich H Bülthoff; Betty J Mohler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  A Novel Clinical-Driven Design for Robotic Hand Rehabilitation: Combining Sensory Training, Effortless Setup, and Large Range of Motion in a Palmar Device.

Authors:  Raphael Rätz; François Conti; René M Müri; Laura Marchal-Crespo
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 2.650

2.  Towards functional robotic training: motor learning of dynamic tasks is enhanced by haptic rendering but hampered by arm weight support.

Authors:  Özhan Özen; Karin A Buetler; Laura Marchal-Crespo
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2022-02-13       Impact factor: 4.262

3.  Congruency of Information Rather Than Body Ownership Enhances Motor Performance in Highly Embodied Virtual Reality.

Authors:  Ingrid A Odermatt; Karin A Buetler; Nicolas Wenk; Özhan Özen; Joaquin Penalver-Andres; Tobias Nef; Fred W Mast; Laura Marchal-Crespo
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 4.677

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.