Literature DB >> 33602817

The Srs2 helicase dampens DNA damage checkpoint by recycling RPA from chromatin.

Nalini Dhingra1, Sahiti Kuppa2, Lei Wei1, Nilisha Pokhrel3, Silva Baburyan4, Xiangzhou Meng1, Edwin Antony2, Xiaolan Zhao5.   

Abstract

The DNA damage checkpoint induces many cellular changes to cope with genotoxic stress. However, persistent checkpoint signaling can be detrimental to growth partly due to blockage of cell cycle resumption. Checkpoint dampening is essential to counter such harmful effects, but its mechanisms remain to be understood. Here, we show that the DNA helicase Srs2 removes a key checkpoint sensor complex, RPA, from chromatin to down-regulate checkpoint signaling in budding yeast. The Srs2 and RPA antagonism is supported by their numerous suppressive genetic interactions. Importantly, moderate reduction of RPA binding to single-strand DNA (ssDNA) rescues hypercheckpoint signaling caused by the loss of Srs2 or its helicase activity. This rescue correlates with a reduction in the accumulated RPA and the associated checkpoint kinase on chromatin in srs2 mutants. Moreover, our data suggest that Srs2 regulation of RPA is separable from its roles in recombinational repair and critically contributes to genotoxin resistance. We conclude that dampening checkpoint by Srs2-mediated RPA recycling from chromatin aids cellular survival of genotoxic stress and has potential implications in other types of DNA transactions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  RPA regulation; Srs2; checkpoint dampening; genotoxic stress; recombinational repair

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33602817      PMCID: PMC7923681          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2020185118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  59 in total

1.  Homologous recombination is responsible for cell death in the absence of the Sgs1 and Srs2 helicases.

Authors:  S Gangloff; C Soustelle; F Fabre
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  Evidence of meiotic crossover control in Saccharomyces cerevisiae through Mec1-mediated phosphorylation of replication protein A.

Authors:  Amy J Bartrand; Dagmawi Iyasu; Suzanne M Marinco; George S Brush
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-08-22       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Extensive DNA damage-induced sumoylation contributes to replication and repair and acts in addition to the mec1 checkpoint.

Authors:  Catherine A Cremona; Prabha Sarangi; Yan Yang; Lisa E Hang; Sadia Rahman; Xiaolan Zhao
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 17.970

4.  SUMO-modified PCNA recruits Srs2 to prevent recombination during S phase.

Authors:  Boris Pfander; George-Lucian Moldovan; Meik Sacher; Carsten Hoege; Stefan Jentsch
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  RFWD3-Mediated Ubiquitination Promotes Timely Removal of Both RPA and RAD51 from DNA Damage Sites to Facilitate Homologous Recombination.

Authors:  Shojiro Inano; Koichi Sato; Yoko Katsuki; Wataru Kobayashi; Hiroki Tanaka; Kazuhiro Nakajima; Shinichiro Nakada; Hiroyuki Miyoshi; Kerstin Knies; Akifumi Takaori-Kondo; Detlev Schindler; Masamichi Ishiai; Hitoshi Kurumizaka; Minoru Takata
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 17.970

6.  DNA helicase Srs2 disrupts the Rad51 presynaptic filament.

Authors:  Lumir Krejci; Stephen Van Komen; Ying Li; Jana Villemain; Mothe Sreedhar Reddy; Hannah Klein; Thomas Ellenberger; Patrick Sung
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  MEC1-dependent phosphorylation of yeast RPA1 in vitro.

Authors:  Hee-Sook Kim; Steven J Brill
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2003-12-09

8.  Recognition of SUMO-modified PCNA requires tandem receptor motifs in Srs2.

Authors:  Anthony A Armstrong; Firaz Mohideen; Christopher D Lima
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  The BioGRID interaction database: 2019 update.

Authors:  Rose Oughtred; Chris Stark; Bobby-Joe Breitkreutz; Jennifer Rust; Lorrie Boucher; Christie Chang; Nadine Kolas; Lara O'Donnell; Genie Leung; Rochelle McAdam; Frederick Zhang; Sonam Dolma; Andrew Willems; Jasmin Coulombe-Huntington; Andrew Chatr-Aryamontri; Kara Dolinski; Mike Tyers
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Genome engineering in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using CRISPR-Cas systems.

Authors:  James E DiCarlo; Julie E Norville; Prashant Mali; Xavier Rios; John Aach; George M Church
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  4 in total

1.  Cryo-EM structure of DNA-bound Smc5/6 reveals DNA clamping enabled by multi-subunit conformational changes.

Authors:  You Yu; Shibai Li; Zheng Ser; Huihui Kuang; Thane Than; Danying Guan; Xiaolan Zhao; Dinshaw J Patel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 12.779

2.  Human HELB is a processive motor protein that catalyzes RPA clearance from single-stranded DNA.

Authors:  Silvia Hormeno; Oliver J Wilkinson; Clara Aicart-Ramos; Sahiti Kuppa; Edwin Antony; Mark S Dillingham; Fernando Moreno-Herrero
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 12.779

3.  Rtt105 regulates RPA function by configurationally stapling the flexible domains.

Authors:  Jaigeeth Deveryshetty; Rahul Chadda; Jenna R Mattice; Sahiti Kuppa; Nilisha Pokhrel; Vikas Kaushik; Angela Patterson; Nalini Dhingra; Sushil Pangeni; Marisa K Sadauskas; Sajad Shiekh; Hamza Balci; Taekjip Ha; Xiaolan Zhao; Brian Bothner; Edwin Antony
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 17.694

4.  Rad54 and Rdh54 prevent Srs2-mediated disruption of Rad51 presynaptic filaments.

Authors:  Aviv Meir; J Brooks Crickard; Youngho Kwon; Patrick Sung; Eric C Greene
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 11.205

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.