Kristina Tomra Nielsen1,2,3, Susanne Guidetti4, Cecilie von Bülow5,6, Louise Klokker7, Eva Ejlersen Wæhrens5,6. 1. Department of Occupational Therapy, University College of Northern Denmark (UCN), Selma Lagerløfs vej 2, DK-9220, Aalborg Ø, Denmark. ktn@ucn.dk. 2. The ADL Unit, the Parker Institute, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg - Frederiksberg, Nordre Fasanvej 57, Road 8, entrance 19, DK-2000, Frederiksberg, Denmark. ktn@ucn.dk. 3. The Research Initiative for Activity Studies and Occupational Therapy, Research Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark (SDU), J.B. Winsløwsvej 9, DK-5000, Odense, Denmark. ktn@ucn.dk. 4. Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Occupational Therapy, Karolinska Institutet, Alfred Nobels Allé 23, SE-141 83, Huddinge, Sweden. 5. The ADL Unit, the Parker Institute, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg - Frederiksberg, Nordre Fasanvej 57, Road 8, entrance 19, DK-2000, Frederiksberg, Denmark. 6. The Research Initiative for Activity Studies and Occupational Therapy, Research Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark (SDU), J.B. Winsløwsvej 9, DK-5000, Odense, Denmark. 7. The Musculoskeletal Statistics Unit, the Parker Institute, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg - Frederiksberg, Nordre Fasanvej 57, Road 8, entrance 19, DK-2000, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The "A Better everyday LifE" (ABLE) intervention was developed to accommodate the need of a program addressing ability to perform activities of daily living (ADL) in persons with chronic conditions living at home. During intervention development, it is necessary to evaluate relevant aspects of the feasibility of a program. Thus, the aim was to evaluate the feasibility of content and delivery of ABLE version 1.0. METHODS: A one group pre- and post-test design was applied. Thirty persons with chronic conditions, two occupational therapists (OTs), and five occupational therapy students (OTSs) participated. ABLE 1.0 is an 8-week program consisting of ADL evaluation (session 1); goal setting and reasons for ADL problems (session 2); intervention (sessions 3-7); and re-evaluation (final session), conducted in the clients' home-setting and local area. Sessions 1-4 and the final session was mandatory. To evaluate the feasibility of content and delivery, the OTs, after each session, reported on applied intervention component(s), time-use, needed equipment, adjustments, meaningfulness, confidence, progress toward goal attainment, and side effects using registration forms. The clients reported on progress toward goal attainment, meaningfulness, and satisfaction. Clinically relevant improvements in ADL ability were identified using the ADL-Interview (ADL-I) and the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS). Goal attainment was evaluated using the Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS). RESULTS: Twenty clients (67%) completed ABLE 1.0 and received four sessions (median = 4, range 4-7) each lasting between 30 and 94 min. Most frequently applied component was "Changing habits related to task performance". Generally, OTs reported having the needed equipment. Deviations from the manual were made by omission of GAS and AMPS and less than mandatory number of sessions per client. The OTs reported confidence in delivering the program and the clients perceived the program as meaningful and satisfying, and experienced progress toward goal attainment. Goal attainment was found in 52% of the goals. Sixteen (80%) clients obtained clinically relevant improvements in self-reported or observed ADL ability. CONCLUSIONS: The content and delivery of ABLE 1.0 was feasible. However, the study revealed a need to adjust the recruitment procedure and make minor changes in the intervention manual. A pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) study is recommended. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with registration no. NCT03335709 on November 8, 2017.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The "A Better everyday LifE" (ABLE) intervention was developed to accommodate the need of a program addressing ability to perform activities of daily living (ADL) in persons with chronic conditions living at home. During intervention development, it is necessary to evaluate relevant aspects of the feasibility of a program. Thus, the aim was to evaluate the feasibility of content and delivery of ABLE version 1.0. METHODS: A one group pre- and post-test design was applied. Thirty persons with chronic conditions, two occupational therapists (OTs), and five occupational therapy students (OTSs) participated. ABLE 1.0 is an 8-week program consisting of ADL evaluation (session 1); goal setting and reasons for ADL problems (session 2); intervention (sessions 3-7); and re-evaluation (final session), conducted in the clients' home-setting and local area. Sessions 1-4 and the final session was mandatory. To evaluate the feasibility of content and delivery, the OTs, after each session, reported on applied intervention component(s), time-use, needed equipment, adjustments, meaningfulness, confidence, progress toward goal attainment, and side effects using registration forms. The clients reported on progress toward goal attainment, meaningfulness, and satisfaction. Clinically relevant improvements in ADL ability were identified using the ADL-Interview (ADL-I) and the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS). Goal attainment was evaluated using the Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS). RESULTS: Twenty clients (67%) completed ABLE 1.0 and received four sessions (median = 4, range 4-7) each lasting between 30 and 94 min. Most frequently applied component was "Changing habits related to task performance". Generally, OTs reported having the needed equipment. Deviations from the manual were made by omission of GAS and AMPS and less than mandatory number of sessions per client. The OTs reported confidence in delivering the program and the clients perceived the program as meaningful and satisfying, and experienced progress toward goal attainment. Goal attainment was found in 52% of the goals. Sixteen (80%) clients obtained clinically relevant improvements in self-reported or observed ADL ability. CONCLUSIONS: The content and delivery of ABLE 1.0 was feasible. However, the study revealed a need to adjust the recruitment procedure and make minor changes in the intervention manual. A pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) study is recommended. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with registration no. NCT03335709 on November 8, 2017.
Entities:
Keywords:
Disability; Everyday life; Health care quality; Rehabilitation
Authors: Lisa J Cameron; Lisa M Somerville; Catherine E Naismith; Dina Watterson; Valentina Maric; Natasha A Lannin Journal: Clin Rehabil Date: 2018-01-12 Impact factor: 3.477
Authors: Vita Hagelskjær; Kristina Tomra Nielsen; Cecilie von Bulow; Lisa Gregersen Oestergaard; Maud Graff; Eva Ejlersen Wæhrens Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2021-11-26 Impact factor: 2.692