Jenny Stenström1, Ingrid Hedenfalk2, Catharina Hagerling3. 1. Division of Clinical Genetics, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Lund University, SE-221 85, Lund, Sweden. 2. Division of Oncology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, SE-221 85, Lund, Sweden. 3. Division of Clinical Genetics, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Lund University, SE-221 85, Lund, Sweden. catharina.hagerling@med.lu.se.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer have poor outcome with a median survival of approximately 2 years. While novel therapeutic options are urgently needed, the great majority of breast cancer research has focused on the primary tumor and less is known about metastatic breast cancer and the prognostic impact of the metastatic tumor microenvironment. Here we investigate the immune landscape in unique clinical material. We explore how the immune landscape changes with metastatic progression and elucidate the prognostic role of immune cells infiltrating primary tumors and corresponding lymph node and more importantly distant metastases. METHODS: Immunohistochemical staining was performed on human breast cancer tissue microarrays from primary tumors (n = 231), lymph node metastases (n = 129), and distant metastases (n = 43). Infiltration levels of T lymphocytes (CD3+), regulatory T lymphocytes (Tregs, FOXP3+), macrophages (CD68+), and neutrophils (NE+) were assessed in primary tumors. T lymphocytes and Tregs were further investigated in lymph node and distant metastases. RESULTS: T lymphocyte and Treg infiltration were the most clinically important immune cell populations in primary tumors. Infiltration of T lymphocytes and Tregs in primary tumors correlated with proliferation (P = 0.007, P = 0.000) and estrogen receptor negativity (P = 0.046, P = 0.026). While both T lymphocyte and Treg infiltration had a negative correlation to luminal A subtype (P = 0.031, P = 0.000), only Treg infiltration correlated to luminal B (P = 0.034) and triple-negative subtype (P = 0.019). In primary tumors, infiltration of T lymphocytes was an independent prognostic factor for recurrence-free survival (HR = 1.77, CI = 1.01-3.13, P = 0.048), while Treg infiltration was an independent prognostic factor for breast cancer-specific survival (HR = 1.72, CI = 1.14-2.59, P = 0.01). Moreover, breast cancer patients with Treg infiltration in their distant metastases had poor post-recurrence survival (P = 0.039). Treg infiltration levels changed with metastatic tumor progression in 50% of the patients, but there was no significant trend toward neither lower nor higher infiltration. CONCLUSION: Treg infiltration could have clinical applicability as a prognostic biomarker, deciphering metastatic breast cancer patients with worse prognosis, and accordingly, could be a suitable immunotherapeutic target for patients with metastatic breast cancer. Importantly, half of the patients had changes in Treg infiltration during the course of metastatic progression emphasizing the need to characterize the metastatic immune landscape.
BACKGROUND: Patients diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer have poor outcome with a median survival of approximately 2 years. While novel therapeutic options are urgently needed, the great majority of breast cancer research has focused on the primary tumor and less is known about metastatic breast cancer and the prognostic impact of the metastatic tumor microenvironment. Here we investigate the immune landscape in unique clinical material. We explore how the immune landscape changes with metastatic progression and elucidate the prognostic role of immune cells infiltrating primary tumors and corresponding lymph node and more importantly distant metastases. METHODS: Immunohistochemical staining was performed on human breast cancer tissue microarrays from primary tumors (n = 231), lymph node metastases (n = 129), and distant metastases (n = 43). Infiltration levels of T lymphocytes (CD3+), regulatory T lymphocytes (Tregs, FOXP3+), macrophages (CD68+), and neutrophils (NE+) were assessed in primary tumors. T lymphocytes and Tregs were further investigated in lymph node and distant metastases. RESULTS: T lymphocyte and Treg infiltration were the most clinically important immune cell populations in primary tumors. Infiltration of T lymphocytes and Tregs in primary tumors correlated with proliferation (P = 0.007, P = 0.000) and estrogen receptor negativity (P = 0.046, P = 0.026). While both T lymphocyte and Treg infiltration had a negative correlation to luminal A subtype (P = 0.031, P = 0.000), only Treg infiltration correlated to luminal B (P = 0.034) and triple-negative subtype (P = 0.019). In primary tumors, infiltration of T lymphocytes was an independent prognostic factor for recurrence-free survival (HR = 1.77, CI = 1.01-3.13, P = 0.048), while Treg infiltration was an independent prognostic factor for breast cancer-specific survival (HR = 1.72, CI = 1.14-2.59, P = 0.01). Moreover, breast cancer patients with Treg infiltration in their distant metastases had poor post-recurrence survival (P = 0.039). Treg infiltration levels changed with metastatic tumor progression in 50% of the patients, but there was no significant trend toward neither lower nor higher infiltration. CONCLUSION: Treg infiltration could have clinical applicability as a prognostic biomarker, deciphering metastatic breast cancer patients with worse prognosis, and accordingly, could be a suitable immunotherapeutic target for patients with metastatic breast cancer. Importantly, half of the patients had changes in Treg infiltration during the course of metastatic progression emphasizing the need to characterize the metastatic immune landscape.
Entities:
Keywords:
Breast cancer; FOXP3; Immune cells; Metastasis; Regulatory T lymphocytes
Authors: Seung Tae Kim; Hoiseon Jeong; Ok Hee Woo; Jae Hong Seo; Aeree Kim; Eun Sook Lee; Sang Won Shin; Yeul Hong Kim; Jun Suk Kim; Kyong Hwa Park Journal: Am J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 2.339
Authors: Emanuela Romano; Monika Kusio-Kobialka; Periklis G Foukas; Petra Baumgaertner; Christiane Meyer; Pierluigi Ballabeni; Olivier Michielin; Benjamin Weide; Pedro Romero; Daniel E Speiser Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2015-04-27 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Greta Carioli; Matteo Malvezzi; Teresa Rodriguez; Paola Bertuccio; Eva Negri; Carlo La Vecchia Journal: Breast Date: 2017-10-04 Impact factor: 4.380
Authors: Anuradha A Shastri; Joseph Lombardo; Samantha C Okere; Stephanie Higgins; Brittany C Smith; Tiziana DeAngelis; Ajay Palagani; Kamryn Hines; Daniel A Monti; Stella Volpe; Edith P Mitchell; Nicole L Simone Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2021-12-24 Impact factor: 5.923