| Literature DB >> 35872927 |
Min Liu1.
Abstract
Background: Chinese herbal formulas have certain effects on patients with breast cancer (BC). This article discussed the effect of Buqi Yangxue decoction on the immune function and nutritional status of BC patients and provided an evidence for traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) to improve the quality of life and curative effect of BC patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35872927 PMCID: PMC9303106 DOI: 10.1155/2022/5900024
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Math Methods Med ISSN: 1748-670X Impact factor: 2.809
Comparison of general data between the two groups before treatment.
| Chinese herbal formula group | Control group |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average age (years) | 56.62 ± 8.26 | 57.23 ± 8.21 | >0.05 |
| Weight (kg) | 50.37 ± 6.12 | 49.54 ± 7.15 | >0.05 |
| Tumor site | >0.05 | ||
| Left | 12 | 10 | |
| Right | 11 | 13 | |
| TNM stage | >0.05 | ||
| I-II | 9 | 8 | |
| III-IV | 14 | 15 | |
| Lymph node metastasis | 12 | 11 | >0.05 |
Comparison of nutritional indexes between two groups.
| HGb | ALB | TP | PA | TRF | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control group | |||||
| Before treatment | 110.48±12.62 | 35.37±6.24 | 50.16±7.34 | 254.84±24.17 | 954.16±154.23 |
| After treatment | 120.23±18.50 | 40.71±4.14 | 57.31±6.68 | 270.63±18.55 | 2001.44±221.68 |
| | 3.517 | 5.347 | 11.064 | 2.368 | 151.471 |
| | <0.05 | <0.05 | <0.05 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
| Chinese herbal formula group | |||||
| Before treatment | 110.24±5.47 | 36.62±4.50 | 49.67±7.45 | 262.47±25.39 | 975.51±183.17 |
| After treatment | 122.67±6.59 | 43.27±6.09 | 65.25±6.03 | 293.41±20.65 | 2517.54±208.61 |
| | 2.647 | 6.382 | 10.930 | 3.417 | 184.173 |
| | <0.01 | <0.05 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
Comparison of lymphocyte subsets between two groups before and after treatment.
| CD3+ (%) | CD4+ (%) | CD8+ (%) | CD4+/CD8+ (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chinese herbal formula group | ||||
| Before treatment | 53.34 ± 7.05 | 31.27 ± 5.40 | 36.21 ± 4.24 | 0.86 ± 0.22 |
| After treatment | 66.12 ± 5.68 | 40.22 ± 3.34 | 31.24 ± 5.37 | 1.29 ± 0.39 |
| | 13.574 | 10.367 | 5.698 | 1.334 |
| | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
| Control group | ||||
| Before treatment | 53.15 ± 9.17 | 31.47 ± 6.25 | 36.93 ± 5.08 | 0.85 ± 0.11 |
| After treatment | 56.73 ± 6.46 | 35.04 ± 6.21 | 35.82 ± 3.63 | 0.98 ± 0.27 |
| | 14.369 | 10.084 | 6.337 | 2.378 |
| | <0.05 | <0.01 | >0.05 | <0.05 |
Comparison of immunological indexes between two groups.
| IgG (g/l) | IgA (g/l) | IgM (g/l) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chinese herbal formula group | |||
| Before treatment | 10.26 ± 1.05 | 2.27 ± 5.40 | 1.83 ± 4.24 |
| After treatment | 13.35 ± 5.68 | 2.95 ± 3.34 | 2.16 ± 5.37 |
| | 0.444 | 0.286 | 0.559 |
| | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
| Control group | |||
| Before treatment | 10.37 ± 9.17 | 2.35 ± 6.25 | 1.79 ± 5.08 |
| After treatment | 11.50 ± 6.46 | 2.33 ± 6.21 | 2.09 ± 3.63 |
| | 12.241 | 20.012 | 13.651 |
| | >0.05 | >0.05 | <0.05 |
Comparison of TCM symptom score between two groups.
|
| Before treatment | After treatment | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chinese herbal formula group | 33 | 32.52 ± 2.21 | 17.12 ± 2.58 |
| Control group | 33 | 33.02 ± 2.98 | 21.61 ± 1.36 |
|
| 1.472 | 3.635 | |
|
| >0.05 | <0.05 |
Comparison of adverse reactions between the two groups.
|
| Nausea and vomiting | Inappetence | Liver function impairment | Leukopenia | Thrombocytopenia | Total incidence (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control group | 33 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 48.5 |
| Chinese herbal formula group | 33 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 42.4 |