Literature DB >> 33602132

A simple method to estimate the in-house limit of detection for genetic mutations with low allele frequencies in whole-exome sequencing analysis by next-generation sequencing.

Takumi Miura1, Satoshi Yasuda1,2, Yoji Sato3,4,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has profoundly changed the approach to genetic/genomic research. Particularly, the clinical utility of NGS in detecting mutations associated with disease risk has contributed to the development of effective therapeutic strategies. Recently, comprehensive analysis of somatic genetic mutations by NGS has also been used as a new approach for controlling the quality of cell substrates for manufacturing biopharmaceuticals. However, the quality evaluation of cell substrates by NGS largely depends on the limit of detection (LOD) for rare somatic mutations. The purpose of this study was to develop a simple method for evaluating the ability of whole-exome sequencing (WES) by NGS to detect mutations with low allele frequency. To estimate the LOD of WES for low-frequency somatic mutations, we repeatedly and independently performed WES of a reference genomic DNA using the same NGS platform and assay design. LOD was defined as the allele frequency with a relative standard deviation (RSD) value of 30% and was estimated by a moving average curve of the relation between RSD and allele frequency.
RESULTS: Allele frequencies of 20 mutations in the reference material that had been pre-validated by droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) were obtained from 5, 15, 30, or 40 G base pair (Gbp) sequencing data per run. There was a significant association between the allele frequencies measured by WES and those pre-validated by ddPCR, whose p-value decreased as the sequencing data size increased. By this method, the LOD of allele frequency in WES with the sequencing data of 15 Gbp or more was estimated to be between 5 and 10%.
CONCLUSIONS: For properly interpreting the WES data of somatic genetic mutations, it is necessary to have a cutoff threshold of low allele frequencies. The in-house LOD estimated by the simple method shown in this study provides a rationale for setting the cutoff.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Allele frequency; Limit of detection; Next-generation sequencing; Omics research

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33602132      PMCID: PMC7893872          DOI: 10.1186/s12863-020-00956-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Genom Data        ISSN: 2730-6844


  26 in total

Review 1.  Standardization efforts enabling next-generation sequencing and microarray based biomarkers for precision medicine.

Authors:  Yuanting Zheng; Tao Qing; Yunjie Song; Jinhang Zhu; Ying Yu; Weiwei Shi; Lajos Pusztai; Leming Shi
Journal:  Biomark Med       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 2.851

Review 2.  Detecting Somatic Mutations in Normal Cells.

Authors:  Yanmei Dou; Heather D Gold; Lovelace J Luquette; Peter J Park
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 11.639

3.  Validation of a method for predicting the precision, limit of detection and range of quantitation in competitive ELISA.

Authors:  Dong Hwan Choi; Yoshio Katakura; Rieko Matsuda; Yuzuru Hayashi; Masato Hirobe; Yasuhiro Goda; Kazuaki Ninomiya; Suteaki Shioya
Journal:  Anal Sci       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.081

4.  Next-generation DNA sequencing.

Authors:  Jay Shendure; Hanlee Ji
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 54.908

5.  Plasmid-Based Materials as Multiplex Quality Controls and Calibrators for Clinical Next-Generation Sequencing Assays.

Authors:  David J Sims; Robin D Harrington; Eric C Polley; Thomas D Forbes; Michele G Mehaffey; Paul M McGregor; Corinne E Camalier; Kneshay N Harper; Courtney H Bouk; Biswajit Das; Barbara A Conley; James H Doroshow; P Mickey Williams; Chih-Jian Lih
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 5.568

Review 6.  Coming of age: ten years of next-generation sequencing technologies.

Authors:  Sara Goodwin; John D McPherson; W Richard McCombie
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 53.242

7.  Next-Generation Sequencing in the Clinical Setting Clarifies Patient Characteristics and Potential Actionability.

Authors:  Cheyennedra C Bieg-Bourne; Sherri Z Millis; David E Piccioni; Paul T Fanta; Michael E Goldberg; Juliann Chmielecki; Barbara A Parker; Razelle Kurzrock
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 8.  Applications and analysis of targeted genomic sequencing in cancer studies.

Authors:  Findlay Bewicke-Copley; Emil Arjun Kumar; Giuseppe Palladino; Koorosh Korfi; Jun Wang
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 7.271

9.  Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform.

Authors:  Heng Li; Richard Durbin
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-05-18       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  Tumorigenicity-associated characteristics of human iPS cell lines.

Authors:  Satoshi Yasuda; Shinji Kusakawa; Takuya Kuroda; Takumi Miura; Keiko Tano; Nozomi Takada; Satoko Matsuyama; Akifumi Matsuyama; Michiyo Nasu; Akihiro Umezawa; Takao Hayakawa; Hideki Tsutsumi; Yoji Sato
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Correlation Between Genetic Abnormalities in Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derivatives and Abnormal Tissue Formation in Tumorigenicity Tests.

Authors:  Takako Yamamoto; Yoji Sato; Satoshi Yasuda; Masayuki Shikamura; Takashi Tamura; Chiemi Takenaka; Naoko Takasu; Masaki Nomura; Hiromi Dohi; Masayo Takahashi; Michiko Mandai; Yonehiro Kanemura; Masaya Nakamura; Hideyuki Okano; Shin Kawamata
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 7.655

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.