Literature DB >> 3359893

Comparison of fresh and paraffin-embedded tissue as starting material for DNA flow cytometry and evaluation of intratumor heterogeneity.

O P Kallioniemi1.   

Abstract

Flow cytometric analysis of DNA ploidy and S-phase fraction (SPF) from paraffin-embedded tumors has become an important diagnostic and prognostic tool in clinical pathology and investigative oncology. The present study aimed at elucidating the reliability of the method. About 90% of the 1,400 paraffin-embedded tumors analyzed were evaluable for DNA index and about 70% for SPF, although considerable differences between various tumor types were detected. The within-assay coefficients of variation for determination of tumor DNA index and SPF were 2% and 6%, respectively. Intratumor variation in DNA index was observed in 24% of breast and in 21% of ovarian carcinomas and variation in SPF in 36% and 29% of the respective tumors. Intratumor variation in SPF was greatest in DNA-diploid tumors, which may indicate that SPF values in these tumors may be less reliable owing to variations in the proportions of tumor and nontumor cells. If the methodological variation and the intratumor variation were taken into account, there was a good correlation between DNA indices (r = 0.980) and between SPF values (r = 0.794) obtained from fresh and paraffin-embedded tumors. It is concluded that accurate determination of DNA index and SPF from paraffin-embedded tumors is possible in the majority of cases. Regardless of the type of starting material used for DNA flow cytometry it is advantageous to study several samples from each tumor to account for the intratumor heterogeneity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3359893     DOI: 10.1002/cyto.990090211

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytometry        ISSN: 0196-4763


  37 in total

1.  Flow cytometric analysis of the nuclear DNA content of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  H Ishizu
Journal:  Jpn J Surg       Date:  1989-11

2.  Tracing the tumor lineage.

Authors:  Nicholas E Navin; James Hicks
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 6.603

3.  Value of quantitative pathological variables as prognostic factors in advanced ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  M Brinkhuis; J P Baak; G A Meijer; P J van Diest; O Mogensen; P Bichel; J P Neijt
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 4.  The study of endocrine tumors by flow and image cytometry.

Authors:  Ingrid Zbieranowski; David Murray
Journal:  Endocr Pathol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.943

5.  Estrogen receptor beta is coexpressed with ERalpha and PR and associated with nodal status, grade, and proliferation rate in breast cancer.

Authors:  T A Järvinen; M Pelto-Huikko; K Holli; J Isola
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.307

6.  Evaluation of the clonal relationship between primary and metastatic renal cell carcinoma by comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  H Bissig; J Richter; R Desper; V Meier; P Schraml; A A Schäffer; G Sauter; M J Mihatsch; H Moch
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.307

7.  The change of proliferating cell nuclear antigen and apoptosis of the MM46 mammary cancer cells of the mouse after single high-dose irradiation.

Authors:  Michiya Kobayashi; Ken Okamoto; Tsutomu Namikawa; Takehiro Okabayashi; Keijiro Araki
Journal:  Med Mol Morphol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.309

8.  Proliferating cell nuclear antigen immunohistochemistry using monoclonal antibody 19A2 and a new antigen retrieval technique has prognostic impact in archival paraffin-embedded node-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  S M Siitonen; O P Kallioniemi; J J Isola
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 4.307

9.  Determining factors which predict response to primary medical therapy in breast cancer using a single fine needle aspirate with immunocytochemical staining and flow cytometry.

Authors:  I N Fernando; T J Powles; M Dowsett; S Ashley; L McRobert; J Titley; M G Ormerod; N Sacks; M C Nicolson; A Nash
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 10.  Tumor heterogeneity: causes and consequences.

Authors:  Andriy Marusyk; Kornelia Polyak
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2009-11-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.