Literature DB >> 33598559

Non-invasive brain stimulation as add-on therapy for subacute post-stroke aphasia: a randomized trial (NORTHSTAR).

Anna Zumbansen1, Sandra E Black2, Joyce L Chen3, Dylan J Edwards4,5,6, Alexander Hartmann7, Wolf-Dieter Heiss8, Sylvain Lanthier9, Paul Lesperance10, George Mochizuki11, Caroline Paquette12, Elizabeth A Rochon13, Ilona Rubi-Fessen14, Jennie Valles15, Heike Kneifel14, Susan Wortman-Jutt4,15, Alexander Thiel1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) with speech therapy might improve recovery from post-stroke aphasia. This three-armed sham-controlled blinded prospective proof-of-concept study tested 1 Hz subthreshold repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and 2-mA cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (ctDCS) on the right pars triangularis in subacute post-stroke aphasia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-three patients with left middle cerebral artery infarcts were recruited in five hospitals (Canada/United States/Germany, 01-2014/03-2018) and randomized to receive rTMS (N = 20), ctDCS (N = 24) or sham stimulation (N = 19) with ST for 10 days. Primary outcome variables were Z-score changes in naming, semantic fluency and comprehension tests and adverse event frequency. Secondary outcome variable was the percent change in the Unified Aphasia Score. Intention-to-treat analyses tested between-group effects at days 1 and 30 post-treatment with a pre-planned subgroup analysis for lesion location (affecting Broca's area or not).
RESULTS: Naming was significantly improved by rTMS (median = 1.91/interquartile range = 0.77/p = .01) at 30 days versus ctDCS (median = 1.11/interquartile range = 1.51) and sham stimulation (median = 1.02/interquartile range = 1.71). All other primary results were non-significant. The rTMS effect was driven by the patient subgroup with intact Broca's area where NIBS tended to improve UnAS (median = 33.2%/interquartile range = 46.7%/p = .062) versus sham stimulation (median = 12.5%/interquartile range = 7.9%) at day 30. Conversely, in patients with infarcted Broca's area, UnAS tended to improve more with sham stimulation (median = 75.0%/interquartile range = 86.9%/p = .053) versus NIBS (median = 12.7%/interquartile range = 31.7).
Conclusion: We found a delayed positive effect of low-frequency rTMS targeting the right pars triangularis on the recovery of naming performance in subacute post-stroke aphasia. This intervention may be beneficial only in patients with morphologically intact Broca's area. © European Stroke Organisation 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aphasia; language therapy; randomized control trial; speech therapy; stroke; transcranial direct current stimulation; transcranial magnetic stimulation

Year:  2020        PMID: 33598559      PMCID: PMC7856587          DOI: 10.1177/2396987320934935

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Stroke J        ISSN: 2396-9873


  25 in total

1.  Normative data and screening power of a shortened version of the Token Test.

Authors:  E De Renzi; P Faglioni
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 4.027

2.  1-Hz repetitive TMS over ipsilateral motor cortex influences the performance of sequential finger movements of different complexity.

Authors:  Laura Avanzino; Marco Bove; Carlo Trompetto; Andrea Tacchino; Carla Ogliastro; Giovanni Abbruzzese
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2008-02-29       Impact factor: 3.386

3.  Bilateral transcranial direct current stimulation modulates activation-induced regional blood flow changes during voluntary movement.

Authors:  Caroline Paquette; Michael Sidel; Basia A Radinska; Jean-Paul Soucy; Alexander Thiel
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 6.200

Review 4.  Delivering for aphasia.

Authors:  Chris Code; Brian Petheram
Journal:  Int J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.484

5.  Cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the right Wernicke's area improves comprehension in subacute stroke patients.

Authors:  Dae Sang You; Dae-Yul Kim; Min Ho Chun; Seung Eun Jung; Sung Jong Park
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.381

Review 6.  A proposed regional hierarchy in recovery of post-stroke aphasia.

Authors:  W-D Heiss; A Thiel
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 2.381

7.  Effects of noninvasive brain stimulation on language networks and recovery in early poststroke aphasia.

Authors:  Alexander Thiel; Alexander Hartmann; Ilona Rubi-Fessen; Carole Anglade; Lutz Kracht; Nora Weiduschat; Josef Kessler; Thomas Rommel; Wolf-Dieter Heiss
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  Canadian stroke best practice recommendations: Stroke rehabilitation practice guidelines, update 2015.

Authors:  Debbie Hebert; M Patrice Lindsay; Amanda McIntyre; Adam Kirton; Peter G Rumney; Stephen Bagg; Mark Bayley; Dar Dowlatshahi; Sean Dukelow; Maridee Garnhum; Ev Glasser; Mary-Lou Halabi; Ester Kang; Marilyn MacKay-Lyons; Rosemary Martino; Annie Rochette; Sarah Rowe; Nancy Salbach; Brenda Semenko; Bridget Stack; Luchie Swinton; Valentine Weber; Matthew Mayer; Sue Verrilli; Gabrielle DeVeber; John Andersen; Karen Barlow; Caitlin Cassidy; Marie-Emmanuelle Dilenge; Darcy Fehlings; Ryan Hung; Jerome Iruthayarajah; Laura Lenz; Annette Majnemer; Jacqueline Purtzki; Mubeen Rafay; Lyn K Sonnenberg; Ashleigh Townley; Shannon Janzen; Norine Foley; Robert Teasell
Journal:  Int J Stroke       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 5.266

9.  Effect of low-frequency rTMS on aphasia in stroke patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Cai-Li Ren; Guo-Fu Zhang; Nan Xia; Chun-Hui Jin; Xiu-Hua Zhang; Jian-Feng Hao; Hong-Bo Guan; Hong Tang; Jian-An Li; De-Liang Cai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Recent advances in the treatment of post-stroke aphasia.

Authors:  Anna Zumbansen; Alexander Thiel
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 5.135

View more
  3 in total

1.  Can Transcranial Electrical Stimulation Facilitate Post-stroke Cognitive Rehabilitation? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ahsan Khan; Kai Yuan; Shi-Chun Bao; Chun Hang Eden Ti; Abdullah Tariq; Nimra Anjum; Raymond Kai-Yu Tong
Journal:  Front Rehabil Sci       Date:  2022-02-10

Review 2.  Reversing the Ruin: Rehabilitation, Recovery, and Restoration After Stroke.

Authors:  Melissa D Stockbridge; Lisa D Bunker; Argye E Hillis
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2022-10-01       Impact factor: 6.030

3.  Differential Effects of Speech and Language Therapy and rTMS in Chronic Versus Subacute Post-stroke Aphasia: Results of the NORTHSTAR-CA Trial.

Authors:  Anna Zumbansen; Heike Kneifel; Latifa Lazzouni; Anja Ophey; Sandra E Black; Joyce L Chen; Dylan Edwards; Thomas Funck; Alexander Erich Hartmann; Wolf-Dieter Heiss; Franziska Hildesheim; Sylvain Lanthier; Paul Lespérance; George Mochizuki; Caroline Paquette; Elizabet Rochon; Ilona Rubi-Fessen; Jennie Valles; Susan Wortman-Jutt; Alexander Thiel
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 3.919

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.