Literature DB >> 33597560

Deep learning identifies morphological features in breast cancer predictive of cancer ERBB2 status and trastuzumab treatment efficacy.

Dmitrii Bychkov1,2, Nina Linder3,4,5, Aleksei Tiulpin6,7,8, Hakan Kücükel3,4, Mikael Lundin3, Stig Nordling9, Harri Sihto9, Jorma Isola10, Tiina Lehtimäki11, Pirkko-Liisa Kellokumpu-Lehtinen12, Karl von Smitten13, Heikki Joensuu4,14, Johan Lundin3,4,15.   

Abstract

The treatment of patients with ERBB2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer with anti-ERBB2 therapy is based on the detection of ERBB2 gene amplification or protein overexpression. Machine learning (ML) algorithms can predict the amplification of ERBB2 based on tumor morphological features, but it is not known whether ML-derived features can predict survival and efficacy of anti-ERBB2 treatment. In this study, we trained a deep learning model with digital images of hematoxylin-eosin (H&E)-stained formalin-fixed primary breast tumor tissue sections, weakly supervised by ERBB2 gene amplification status. The gene amplification was determined by chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH). The training data comprised digitized tissue microarray (TMA) samples from 1,047 patients. The correlation between the deep learning-predicted ERBB2 status, which we call H&E-ERBB2 score, and distant disease-free survival (DDFS) was investigated on a fully independent test set, which included whole-slide tumor images from 712 patients with trastuzumab treatment status available. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) in predicting gene amplification in the test sets was 0.70 (95% CI, 0.63-0.77) on 354 TMA samples and 0.67 (95% CI, 0.62-0.71) on 712 whole-slide images. Among patients with ERBB2-positive cancer treated with trastuzumab, those with a higher than the median morphology-based H&E-ERBB2 score derived from machine learning had more favorable DDFS than those with a lower score (hazard ratio [HR] 0.37; 95% CI, 0.15-0.93; P = 0.034). A high H&E-ERBB2 score was associated with unfavorable survival in patients with ERBB2-negative cancer as determined by CISH. ERBB2-associated morphology correlated with the efficacy of adjuvant anti-ERBB2 treatment and can contribute to treatment-predictive information in breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33597560      PMCID: PMC7890057          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-83102-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  22 in total

1.  Systematic analysis of breast cancer morphology uncovers stromal features associated with survival.

Authors:  Andrew H Beck; Ankur R Sangoi; Samuel Leung; Robert J Marinelli; Torsten O Nielsen; Marc J van de Vijver; Robert B West; Matt van de Rijn; Daphne Koller
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 17.956

2.  Fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide with either docetaxel or vinorelbine, with or without trastuzumab, as adjuvant treatments of breast cancer: final results of the FinHer Trial.

Authors:  Heikki Joensuu; Petri Bono; Vesa Kataja; Tuomo Alanko; Riitta Kokko; Raija Asola; Tapio Utriainen; Taina Turpeenniemi-Hujanen; Sirkku Jyrkkiö; Kari Möykkynen; Leena Helle; Seija Ingalsuo; Marjo Pajunen; Mauri Huusko; Tapio Salminen; Päivi Auvinen; Hannu Leinonen; Mika Leinonen; Jorma Isola; Pirkko-Liisa Kellokumpu-Lehtinen
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-11-02       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Deep learning for prediction of colorectal cancer outcome: a discovery and validation study.

Authors:  Ole-Johan Skrede; Sepp De Raedt; Andreas Kleppe; Tarjei S Hveem; Knut Liestøl; John Maddison; Hanne A Askautrud; Manohar Pradhan; John Arne Nesheim; Fritz Albregtsen; Inger Nina Farstad; Enric Domingo; David N Church; Arild Nesbakken; Neil A Shepherd; Ian Tomlinson; Rachel Kerr; Marco Novelli; David J Kerr; Håvard E Danielsen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  HER2 and Breast Cancer - A Phenomenal Success Story.

Authors:  Daniel F Hayes
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Clinical-grade computational pathology using weakly supervised deep learning on whole slide images.

Authors:  Gabriele Campanella; Matthew G Hanna; Luke Geneslaw; Allen Miraflor; Vitor Werneck Krauss Silva; Klaus J Busam; Edi Brogi; Victor E Reuter; David S Klimstra; Thomas J Fuchs
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 53.440

6.  Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Testing in Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Clinical Practice Guideline Focused Update.

Authors:  Antonio C Wolff; M Elizabeth Hale Hammond; Kimberly H Allison; Brittany E Harvey; Pamela B Mangu; John M S Bartlett; Michael Bilous; Ian O Ellis; Patrick Fitzgibbons; Wedad Hanna; Robert B Jenkins; Michael F Press; Patricia A Spears; Gail H Vance; Giuseppe Viale; Lisa M McShane; Mitchell Dowsett
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  The precision-recall plot is more informative than the ROC plot when evaluating binary classifiers on imbalanced datasets.

Authors:  Takaya Saito; Marc Rehmsmeier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Predicting cancer outcomes from histology and genomics using convolutional networks.

Authors:  Pooya Mobadersany; Safoora Yousefi; Mohamed Amgad; David A Gutman; Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan; José E Velázquez Vega; Daniel J Brat; Lee A D Cooper
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Herceptin® (trastuzumab) in HER2-positive early breast cancer: a systematic review and cumulative network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Florence R Wilson; Megan E Coombes; Christine Brezden-Masley; Mariya Yurchenko; Quinlan Wylie; Reuben Douma; Abhishek Varu; Brian Hutton; Becky Skidmore; Chris Cameron
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2018-11-14

10.  Deep learned tissue "fingerprints" classify breast cancers by ER/PR/Her2 status from H&E images.

Authors:  Rishi R Rawat; Itzel Ortega; Preeyam Roy; Fei Sha; Darryl Shibata; Daniel Ruderman; David B Agus
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  4 in total

1.  Comparative analysis of molecular fingerprints in prediction of drug combination effects.

Authors:  B Zagidullin; Z Wang; Y Guan; E Pitkänen; J Tang
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2021-11-05       Impact factor: 11.622

2.  Outcome and Biomarker Supervised Deep Learning for Survival Prediction in Two Multicenter Breast Cancer Series.

Authors:  Dmitrii Bychkov; Heikki Joensuu; Stig Nordling; Aleksei Tiulpin; Hakan Kücükel; Mikael Lundin; Harri Sihto; Jorma Isola; Tiina Lehtimäki; Pirkko-Liisa Kellokumpu-Lehtinen; Karl von Smitten; Johan Lundin; Nina Linder
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2022-01-18

Review 3.  Digital pathology - Rising to the challenge.

Authors:  Heather Dawson
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-07-22

4.  Deep learning models for histologic grading of breast cancer and association with disease prognosis.

Authors:  David F Steiner; Po-Hsuan Cameron Chen; Ronnachai Jaroensri; Ellery Wulczyn; Narayan Hegde; Trissia Brown; Isabelle Flament-Auvigne; Fraser Tan; Yuannan Cai; Kunal Nagpal; Emad A Rakha; David J Dabbs; Niels Olson; James H Wren; Elaine E Thompson; Erik Seetao; Carrie Robinson; Melissa Miao; Fabien Beckers; Greg S Corrado; Lily H Peng; Craig H Mermel; Yun Liu
Journal:  NPJ Breast Cancer       Date:  2022-10-04
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.