Torsten Goldmann1,2, Bernhard Schmitt3, Julia Müller1, Maren Kröger4, Swetlana Scheufele4,2, Sebastian Marwitz1,2, Dörte Nitschkowski1,2, Marc A Schneider5,6, Michael Meister5,6, Thomas Muley5,6, Michael Thomas7, Christian Kugler8, Klaus F Rabe8,2, Reiner Siebert9, Martin Reck8,2, Ole Ammerpohl10,11. 1. Pathology of the University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Campus Lübeck and the Research Center Borstel, Lübeck, Borstel, Germany. 2. Airway Research Center North, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Grosshansdorf, Germany. 3. Labor Lademannbogen MVZ GmbH, Hamburg, Germany. 4. Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Campus Kiel, Germany. 5. Translational Research Unit, Thoraxklinik at University Hospital Heidelberg, 69126, Heidelberg, Germany. 6. Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany. 7. Internistische Onkologie der Thoraxtumoren, Thoraxklinik im Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany. 8. LungenClinic Grosshansdorf, Grosshansdorf, Germany. 9. Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, 89081, Ulm, Germany. 10. Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, 89081, Ulm, Germany. ole.ammerpohl@uni-ulm.de. 11. Airway Research Center North, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Grosshansdorf, Germany. ole.ammerpohl@uni-ulm.de.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death in most western countries in both, males and females, accounting for roughly 20-25% of all cancer deaths. For choosing the most appropriate therapy regimen a definite diagnosis is a prerequisite. However, histological characterization of bronchoscopic biopsies particularly with low tumor cell content is often challenging. Therefore, this study aims at (a) determining the value of DNA methylation analysis applied to specimens obtained by bronchoscopic biopsy for the diagnosis of lung cancer and (b) at comparing aberrantly CpG loci identified in bronchoscopic biopsy with those identified by analyzing surgical specimens. RESULTS: We report the HumanMethylation450-based DNA methylation analysis of paired samples of bronchoscopic biopsy specimens either from the tumor side or from the contralateral tumor-free bronchus in 37 patients with definite lung cancer diagnosis and 18 patients with suspicious diagnosis. A differential DNA methylation analysis between both biopsy sites of patients with definite diagnosis identified 1303 loci. Even those samples were separated by the set of 1303 loci in which histopathological analysis could not unambiguously define the dignity. Further differential DNA methylation analyses distinguished between SCLC and NSCLC. We validated our results in an independent cohort of 40 primary lung cancers obtained by open surgical resection and their corresponding controls from the same patient as well as in publically available DNA methylation data from a TCGA cohort which could also be classified with high accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: Considering that the prognosis correlates with tumor stage at time of diagnosis, early detection of lung cancer is vital and DNA methylation analysis might add valuable information to reliably characterize lung cancer even in histologically ambiguous sample material.
BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death in most western countries in both, males and females, accounting for roughly 20-25% of all cancer deaths. For choosing the most appropriate therapy regimen a definite diagnosis is a prerequisite. However, histological characterization of bronchoscopic biopsies particularly with low tumor cell content is often challenging. Therefore, this study aims at (a) determining the value of DNA methylation analysis applied to specimens obtained by bronchoscopic biopsy for the diagnosis of lung cancer and (b) at comparing aberrantly CpG loci identified in bronchoscopic biopsy with those identified by analyzing surgical specimens. RESULTS: We report the HumanMethylation450-based DNA methylation analysis of paired samples of bronchoscopic biopsy specimens either from the tumor side or from the contralateral tumor-free bronchus in 37 patients with definite lung cancer diagnosis and 18 patients with suspicious diagnosis. A differential DNA methylation analysis between both biopsy sites of patients with definite diagnosis identified 1303 loci. Even those samples were separated by the set of 1303 loci in which histopathological analysis could not unambiguously define the dignity. Further differential DNA methylation analyses distinguished between SCLC and NSCLC. We validated our results in an independent cohort of 40 primary lung cancers obtained by open surgical resection and their corresponding controls from the same patient as well as in publically available DNA methylation data from a TCGA cohort which could also be classified with high accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: Considering that the prognosis correlates with tumor stage at time of diagnosis, early detection of lung cancer is vital and DNA methylation analysis might add valuable information to reliably characterize lung cancer even in histologically ambiguous sample material.
Entities:
Keywords:
DNA methylation; Lung cancer; Paired biopsies
Authors: Kimberly Walter; Thomas Holcomb; Tom Januario; Robert L Yauch; Pan Du; Richard Bourgon; Somasekar Seshagiri; Lukas C Amler; Garret M Hampton; David S Shames Journal: Epigenomics Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 4.778
Authors: Sebastian Marwitz; Sofia Depner; Dmytro Dvornikov; Ruth Merkle; Magdalena Szczygieł; Karin Müller-Decker; Philippe Lucarelli; Marvin Wäsch; Heimo Mairbäurl; Klaus F Rabe; Christian Kugler; Ekkehard Vollmer; Martin Reck; Swetlana Scheufele; Maren Kröger; Ole Ammerpohl; Reiner Siebert; Torsten Goldmann; Ursula Klingmüller Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2016-05-17 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Hans Brunnström; Leif Johansson; Karin Jirström; Mats Jönsson; Per Jönsson; Maria Planck Journal: Am J Clin Pathol Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 2.493
Authors: Jose I Martin-Subero; Ole Ammerpohl; Marina Bibikova; Eliza Wickham-Garcia; Xabier Agirre; Sara Alvarez; Monika Brüggemann; Stefanie Bug; Maria J Calasanz; Martina Deckert; Martin Dreyling; Ming Q Du; Jan Dürig; Martin J S Dyer; Jian-Bing Fan; Stefan Gesk; Martin-Leo Hansmann; Lana Harder; Sylvia Hartmann; Wolfram Klapper; Ralf Küppers; Manuel Montesinos-Rongen; Inga Nagel; Christiane Pott; Julia Richter; José Román-Gómez; Marc Seifert; Harald Stein; Javier Suela; Lorenz Trümper; Inga Vater; Felipe Prosper; Claudia Haferlach; Juan Cruz Cigudosa; Reiner Siebert Journal: PLoS One Date: 2009-09-11 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Roderick C Slieker; Matthias S Roost; Liesbeth van Iperen; H Eka D Suchiman; Elmar W Tobi; Françoise Carlotti; Eelco J P de Koning; P Eline Slagboom; Bastiaan T Heijmans; Susana M Chuva de Sousa Lopes Journal: PLoS Genet Date: 2015-10-22 Impact factor: 5.917
Authors: A R Florl; C Steinhoff; M Müller; H-H Seifert; C Hader; R Engers; R Ackermann; W A Schulz Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2004-08-31 Impact factor: 7.640