Literature DB >> 33596858

The diagnostic threshold of Cornell assessment of pediatric delirium in detection of postoperative delirium in pediatric surgical patients.

Hong Hong1, Chao Guo1, Zhi-Hua Liu1, Bo-Jie Wang2, Shu-Zhe Zhou3, Dong-Liang Mu1, Dong-Xin Wang1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cornell assessment of pediatric delirium (CAPD) showed advantage in diagnosis of pediatric delirium in Chinese critically ill patients. But its performance in surgical patients is still unclear. The present study was designed to validate the diagnostic performance of CAPD in surgical pediatric patients.
METHODS: This is a prospective validation study. Pediatric patients who underwent selective surgery and general anesthesia were enrolled. Primary outcome was the incidence of delirium within postoperative three days. CAPD Chinese version was used to evaluate if the patient had delirium one time per day. At the meantime, a psychiatrist employed Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders fifth edition to diagnose delirium, which was the "gold standard", and the result was considered as reference standard. Sensitivity, specificity and area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were calculated to investigate the performance of CAPD.
RESULTS: A total of 170 patients were enrolled. Median age was 4 years old. As diagnosed by psychiatrist, 23 (13.5 %) patients experienced at least one episode of delirium during the follow-up period. When diagnostic threshold was set at 9, CAPD showed the optimal sensitivity (87.0 %, 95 %CI 65.3 %-96.6 %) and specificity (98.0 %, 95 %CI 93.7 %-99.5 %) in comparison with other diagnostic thresholds. ROC analysis showed that CAPD was a good delirium assessment instrument with area under curve of 0.911 (95 % CI 0.812 to 1.000, P < 0.001). Agreement between CAPD and reference standard was 0.849 (Kappa coefficient, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: This study found that Cornell assessment of pediatric delirium could be used as an effective instrument in diagnosis of delirium in pediatric surgical patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.chictr.org.cn Identifier: ChiCTR-DDD-17,012,231, August 3, 2017.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chinese version; Cornell assessment of pediatric delirium; Pediatric delirium; Surgery; Threshold

Year:  2021        PMID: 33596858      PMCID: PMC7888127          DOI: 10.1186/s12887-021-02538-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Pediatr        ISSN: 1471-2431            Impact factor:   2.125


  24 in total

1.  Detecting pediatric delirium: development of a rapid observational assessment tool.

Authors:  Gabrielle Silver; Chani Traube; Julia Kearney; Daniel Kelly; Margaret J Yoon; Wendy Nash Moyal; Maalobeeka Gangopadhyay; Huibo Shao; Mary Jo Ward
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: a clear and user-friendly guideline.

Authors:  Valmi D Sousa; Wilaiporn Rojjanasrirat
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 2.431

Review 3.  Analgesia, sedation, and delirium in pediatric surgical critical care.

Authors:  Megan E Cunningham; Adam M Vogel
Journal:  Semin Pediatr Surg       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 2.754

4.  [Clinical application of the Chinese version of Cornell assessment of pediatric delirium: a pilot study].

Authors:  S He; Y L Wang; Z L Zuo
Journal:  Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2019-05-02

5.  Emergence delirium in children: a comparison of sevoflurane and desflurane anesthesia using the Paediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium scale.

Authors:  Bruno G Locatelli; Pablo M Ingelmo; Sahillioğlu Emre; Veronica Meroni; Carmelo Minardi; Geoff Frawley; Alberto Benigni; Salvatore Di Marco; Angelica Spotti; Ilaria Busi; Valter Sonzogni
Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 2.556

6.  Postoperative emergence delirium in pediatric patients undergoing cataract surgery--a comparison of desflurane and sevoflurane.

Authors:  Sameer Sethi; Babita Ghai; Jagat Ram; Jyotsna Wig
Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 2.556

7.  The Preschool Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU: Valid and Reliable Delirium Monitoring for Critically Ill Infants and Children.

Authors:  Heidi A B Smith; Maalobeeka Gangopadhyay; Christina M Goben; Natalie L Jacobowski; Mary Hamilton Chestnut; Shane Savage; Michael T Rutherford; Danica Denton; Jennifer L Thompson; Rameela Chandrasekhar; Michelle Acton; Jessica Newman; Hannah P Noori; Michelle K Terrell; Stacey R Williams; Katherine Griffith; Timothy J Cooper; E Wesley Ely; D Catherine Fuchs; Pratik P Pandharipande
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium: a valid, rapid, observational tool for screening delirium in the PICU*.

Authors:  Chani Traube; Gabrielle Silver; Julia Kearney; Anita Patel; Thomas M Atkinson; Margaret J Yoon; Sari Halpert; Julie Augenstein; Laura E Sickles; Chunshan Li; Bruce Greenwald
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 9.  Diagnostic accuracy of delirium diagnosis in pediatric intensive care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alia Daoud; Jonathan P Duff; Ari R Joffe
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the 3D-CAM Chinese version in surgical ICU patients.

Authors:  Dong-Liang Mu; Pan-Pan Ding; Shu-Zhe Zhou; Mei-Jing Liu; Xin-Yu Sun; Xue-Ying Li; Dong-Xin Wang
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 3.630

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.