Literature DB >> 33595646

Category systems for real-world scenes.

Matt D Anderson1,2, Erich W Graf1,3, James H Elder4,5, Krista A Ehinger6,7, Wendy J Adams1,8.   

Abstract

Categorization performance is a popular metric of scene recognition and understanding in behavioral and computational research. However, categorical constructs and their labels can be somewhat arbitrary. Derived from exhaustive vocabularies of place names (e.g., Deng et al., 2009), or the judgements of small groups of researchers (e.g., Fei-Fei, Iyer, Koch, & Perona, 2007), these categories may not correspond with human-preferred taxonomies. Here, we propose clustering by increasing the rand index via coordinate ascent (CIRCA): an unsupervised, data-driven clustering method for deriving ground-truth scene categories. In Experiment 1, human participants organized 80 stereoscopic images of outdoor scenes from the Southampton-York Natural Scenes (SYNS) dataset (Adams et al., 2016) into discrete categories. In separate tasks, images were grouped according to i) semantic content, ii) three-dimensional spatial structure, or iii) two-dimensional image appearance. Participants provided text labels for each group. Using the CIRCA method, we determined the most representative category structure and then derived category labels for each task/dimension. In Experiment 2, we found that these categories generalized well to a larger set of SYNS images, and new observers. In Experiment 3, we tested the relationship between our category systems and the spatial envelope model (Oliva & Torralba, 2001). Finally, in Experiment 4, we validated CIRCA on a larger, independent dataset of same-different category judgements. The derived category systems outperformed the SUN taxonomy (Xiao, Hays, Ehinger, Oliva, & Torralba, 2010) and an alternative clustering method (Greene, 2019). In summary, we believe this novel categorization method can be applied to a wide range of datasets to derive optimal categorical groupings and labels from psychophysical judgements of stimulus similarity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33595646      PMCID: PMC7900870          DOI: 10.1167/jov.21.2.8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  50 in total

1.  The time course of visual processing: from early perception to decision-making.

Authors:  R VanRullen; S J Thorpe
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  The spatiotemporal dynamics of scene gist recognition.

Authors:  Adam M Larson; Tyler E Freeman; Ryan V Ringer; Lester C Loschky
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  The contributions of central versus peripheral vision to scene gist recognition.

Authors:  Adam M Larson; Lester C Loschky
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Effects of varying levels of expertise on the basic level of categorization.

Authors:  K E Johnson; C B Mervis
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1997-09

5.  Pictures and names: making the connection.

Authors:  P Jolicoeur; M A Gluck; S M Kosslyn
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Familiarity effects on categorization levels of faces and objects.

Authors:  David Anaki; Shlomo Bentin
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2009-02-12

7.  Statistics of high-level scene context.

Authors:  Michelle R Greene
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-10-29

8.  The influence of color on the perception of scene gist.

Authors:  Monica S Castelhano; John M Henderson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Superordinate Level Processing Has Priority Over Basic-Level Processing in Scene Gist Recognition.

Authors:  Qi Sun; Yanju Ren; Yang Zheng; Mingxia Sun; Yuanjie Zheng
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2016-12-06

10.  Ultra rapid object categorization: effects of level, animacy and context.

Authors:  Maren Praß; Cathleen Grimsen; Martina König; Manfred Fahle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.