| Literature DB >> 33595494 |
Sivapriya Sivagurunathan1, Lakshmi Dhevi N Selvan2, Aafaque Ahmad Khan3, Sowmya Parameswaran4, Harsha Bhattacharjee5, Krishna Gogoi5, Harsha Gowda3, T S Keshava Prasad6, Akhilesh Pandey3, S Ashok Kumar7, Pukhraj Rishi8, Ekta Rishi8, Dhanashree Ratra8, Muna Bhende8, Narayanan Janakiraman9, Jyotirmay Biswas10, Subramanian Krishnakumar2.
Abstract
Purpose: Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is one of the leading causes of irreversible central vision loss in the elderly population. The current study aims to find non-invasive prognostic biomarkers in the urine specimens of the AMD patients.Entities:
Keywords: Age-related macular degeneration; biomarkers; proteomics; subtypes; urine
Year: 2021 PMID: 33595494 PMCID: PMC7942106 DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_470_20
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Ophthalmol ISSN: 0301-4738 Impact factor: 1.848
ELISA fold change of MCP in AMD patients with reference to control
| With reference to control ( | Mann whitney U test | EARLY AMD ( | CNVM ( | GA ( | AMD ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control Median=14.45, MCP-1, ng/mmol creatinine | Median | 17.23 | 19.61 | 13.4 | 17.17 |
| ELISA fold change | 1.19238754 | 1.35709 | 0.92734 | 1.18824 | |
| NS | NS | NS | NS |
ELISA fold change of C3a desArg in AMD patients with reference to control
| With reference to control ( | Mann-Whitney U test | Early AMD ( | CNVM ( | GA ( | AMD ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control Median-11.71 C3a desArg ng/mmol creatinine | Median | 14.84 | 12.83 | 18.18 | 14.19 |
| ELISA fold change | 1.27 | 1.1 | 1.55 | 1.21 | |
| NS | NS | NS | NS |
Figure 1Study design for comparative proteomics based mass spectrometry for identifying candidate biomarkers in AMD. 200 μg pooled samples were reduced and alkylated by using Dithiothreitol and Iodoacetamide, respectively. The samples were digested overnight with trypsin (Promega) (1:20) at 37°C. Peptides from each group were labelled using 8plex tandem mass tags with technical replicates as per manufacturer's protocol (Catalogue # 90110 Thermo Fischer Scientific). Peptides derived from control were labelled by 126 and 127N, Early AMD was labelled by 127C and 128N, CNVM were labelled by 128C and 129N, GA was labelled by 129C and 130N and are pooled. The fractions were analyzed using Orbitrap Fusion mass spectrometer and the Raw data was analysed using Proteome discoverer software. The data was further validated using ELISA
Demographics of the cohort (P are calculated based on logistic regression analysis and Chi-square analysis)
| Control | Early AMD | CNVM | GA | AMD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex (Female) | 47.60% | 50% | 28.60% | 8.30% | 30% |
| Age | 57±6 | 63±8 | 67±9 | 70±10 | 66±8 |
| Alcohol | Nil | 17.80% | 23.80% | 33.30% | 23% |
| Smoking | Nil | 10.70% | 23.80% | 16.70% | 16.40% |
| Tobacco | Nil | 14.30% | 28.60% | 8.30% | 18% |
| Diabetes | 14.30% | 28.60% | 28.60% | 33.30% | 29.50% |
| Hypertension | 28.60% | 42.90% | 38.10% | 41.70% | 41% |
| eGFR | 128±25 | 87.72±5 | 91.04±6.5 | 89.22±13.03 | 89.72±38.27 |
| CFHrs1061170(C*) | |||||
| CC | Nil | 4% | 4.80% | 8.30% | 3.50% |
| CT | 56.30% | 76% | 76.20% | 83.30% | 78.90% |
| TT | 43.80% | 20% | 19.00% | 8.30% | 17.50% |
| | 0.15 | 0.13 | 0.09 | 0.09 | |
| C3 rs2230199(G*) | |||||
| GG | Nil | Nil | Nil | 8.30% | 0.80% |
| GC | 12.50% | 32% | 30% | 1.70% | 47.40% |
| CC | 87.50% | 68% | 70% | 50% | 50.90% |
| | 0.188124 | 0.40421 | 0.00846 | 0.0949 |
Figure 2Representation of proteins that are up and down regulated using Venn diagram. (a) Number of urine proteins that are upregulated in each condition (b) Number of urine Proteins that are downregulated in each condition. A total of 24 proteins were commonly upregulated and 12 were commonly downregulated irrespective of stages of AMD. (c) Gene ontology classification of deregulated proteins in urine of AMD patients based on their localization
Pathways De-regulated in AMD. The table lists the signaling pathways that got maximum hit obtained using annotation tools
| Pathways | Count | Benjamini | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Complement and coagulation cascades | 17 | 1.10E-10 | 1.30E-08 |
| Cell adhesion molecule pathways (CAMs) | 22 | 2.30E-10 | 1.30E-08 |
| Lysosome | 19 | 8.60E-09 | 3.30E-07 |
| ECM-receptor interaction | 11 | 1.90E-04 | 5.60E-03 |
| Metabolism of carbohydrates | 9 | 2.50E-03 | 2.20E-02 |
Figure 3(a) Selection criteria used for filtering out molecules for validation. (b and c) Venn diagram matching proteins published in previous Proteomic datasets for AMD. (b) represents matched proteins with fluid proteomes while (c) represents matched proteins with Tissue proteome. Proteins were shortlisted for validation based on the criteria shown in the figure. Out 751 proteins totally identified, 383 were differentially expressed between AMD patients and healthy control, of which 48 proteins matched with previous proteomic datasets in AMD. Out of the 48, 16 proteins were upregulated in both early and late stages and 3 were finally selected for validation based on the availability of ELISA kits
Mass spectrometric fold change of proteins selected for validation with reference to control. All the three proteins chosen were showing upregulation trend in proteomics data
| Gene Symbol | EarlyAMD | CNVM | GA |
|---|---|---|---|
| TIMP-1 | 1.73 | 1.96 | 2.57 |
| APOA-1 | 3.94 | 1.69 | 1.59 |
| SERPINA-1 | 5.03 | 1.51 | 1.30 |
Figure 4Fold change of upregulated proteins in discovery phase and validation phase. Representative spectral Images of MS/MS spectra after HCD for peptide SEEFLIAGK TIMP-1 (a), peptide AVLTIDEK of SERPINA-1 (b) and peptide ATEHLSTLSEK OF APOA-1 (c).m/z 126.1 represents mass tag intensities from control samples and 127.1, 128.1 and 129.1 represents intensities from Early AMD, CNVM and GA respectively. Box and whisker plots of urinary protein levels TIMP-1 (d), SERPINA-1 (e), and APOA-1 (f) in control and AMD patients. The dots beyond the whiskers represent outliers
Validation of differentially expressed proteins in AMD patients using ELISA
| Control | SERPINA-1 ( | APOA-1 ( | TIMP-1 ( | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median | 546 | 0.82 | 0.39 | |||||||||
| Median | 1047 | 1143 | 430.6 | 1003 | 3.3 | 12.78 | 9.69 | 7.3 | 0.85 | 1.1 | 1.76 | 1.03 |
| Fold change | 2 | 2 | - | 2 | 4.02 | 15.59 | 11.81 | 8.9 | 2.18 | 2.82 | 4.51 | 2.64 |
| 0.044 | 0.027 | 0.87 | 0.049 | 0.1 | 0.003 | 0.008 | 0.003 | 0.12 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.01 | |
Figure 5ROC curve of TIMP-1(a), APOA-1(b) and SERPINA-1(c) in differentiating AMD patients and controls based on various combinations with the genotypic data
AUC and P of ROC curves plotted for TIMP-1 in combination with the genotypic data
| With reference to control | Early AMD | CNVM | GA | AMD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TIMP-1 | ||||
| AUC | 0.6 | 0.66 | 0.72 | 0.65 |
| | 0.22 | 0.07 | 0.04 | 0.047 |
| TIMP-1 + CFH | ||||
| AUC | 0.53 | 0.6 | 0.65 | 0.76 |
| | 0.7 | 0.32 | 0.17 | <0.001 |
| TIMP-1 + C3 | ||||
| AUC | 0.58 | 0.53 | 0.55 | 0.66 |
| | 0.36 | 0.77 | 0.65 | 0.03 |
| TIMP-1 + CFH + C3 | ||||
| AUC | 0.61 | 0.54 | 0.58 | 0.8 |
| | 0.2 | 0.62 | 0.43 | <0.0001 |
AUC and P of ROC curves plotted for APOA-1 in combination with the genotypic data
| With reference to control | Early AMD | CNVM | GA | AMD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| APOA-1 | ||||
| AUC | 0.6 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.66 |
| | 0.26 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.02 |
| APOA-1 + CFH | ||||
| AUC | 0.51 | 0.6 | 0.64 | 0.76 |
| | 0.91 | 0.26 | 0.19 | <0.001 |
| APOA-1 + C3 | ||||
| AUC | 0.62 | 0.52 | 0.55 | 0.7 |
| | 0.18 | 0.87 | 0.64 | 0.01 |
| APOA-1 + CFH + C3 | ||||
| AUC | 0.64 | 0.51 | 0.55 | 0.82 |
| | 0.12 | 0.93 | 0.61 | <0.0001 |
ELISA fold change of TGFβ-1 in AMD patients with reference to control
| With reference to control ( | Mann whitney U test | EARLY AMD ( | CNVM ( | GA ( | AMD ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control Median=0.16, TGF β-1, ng/mmol creatinine | Median | 0.08 | 0.22 | 0.5 | 0.27 |
| ELISA fold change | 0.5 | 1.375 | 3.125 | 1.6875 | |
| NS | NS | NS | NS |
AUC and P of ROC curves plotted for SERPINA-1 in combination with the genotypic data
| With reference to control | Early AMD | CNVM | GA | AMD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SERPINA-1 | ||||
| AUC | 0.67 | 0.7 | 0.52 | 0.65 |
| | 0.045 | 0.03 | 0.86 | 0.05 |
| SERPINA-1 + CFH | ||||
| AUC | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.65 | 0.68 |
| | 0.05 | 0.11 | 0.18 | 0.01 |
| SERPINA-1 + C3 | ||||
| AUC | 0.6 | 0.53 | 0.73 | 0.61 |
| | 0.05 | 0.74 | 0.03 | 0.13 |
| SERPINA-1 + CFH + C3 | ||||
| AUC | 0.62 | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.73 |
| | 0.15 | 0.07 | 0.09 | 0.002 |