Literature DB >> 33594974

Exposing distinct subcortical components of the auditory brainstem response evoked by continuous naturalistic speech.

Melissa J Polonenko1,2,3, Ross K Maddox1,2,3,4.   

Abstract

Speech processing is built upon encoding by the auditory nerve and brainstem, yet we know very little about how these processes unfold in specific subcortical structures. These structures are deep and respond quickly, making them difficult to study during ongoing speech. Recent techniques have begun to address this problem, but yield temporally broad responses with consequently ambiguous neural origins. Here, we describe a method that pairs re-synthesized 'peaky' speech with deconvolution analysis of electroencephalography recordings. We show that in adults with normal hearing the method quickly yields robust responses whose component waves reflect activity from distinct subcortical structures spanning auditory nerve to rostral brainstem. We further demonstrate the versatility of peaky speech by simultaneously measuring bilateral and ear-specific responses across different frequency bands and discuss the important practical considerations such as talker choice. The peaky speech method holds promise as a tool for investigating speech encoding and processing, and for clinical applications.
© 2021, Polonenko and Maddox.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EEG; assessment; auditory brainstem response; electroencephalography; evoked potentials; human; neuroscience; speech

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33594974      PMCID: PMC7946424          DOI: 10.7554/eLife.62329

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Elife        ISSN: 2050-084X            Impact factor:   8.140


  3 in total

1.  Optimizing Parameters for Using the Parallel Auditory Brainstem Response to Quickly Estimate Hearing Thresholds.

Authors:  Melissa J Polonenko; Ross K Maddox
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.562

2.  Neural Measures of Pitch Processing in EEG Responses to Running Speech.

Authors:  Florine L Bachmann; Ewen N MacDonald; Jens Hjortkjær
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 4.677

3.  Age-related deficits in dip-listening evident for isolated sentences but not for spoken stories.

Authors:  Vanessa C Irsik; Ingrid S Johnsrude; Björn Herrmann
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.