Literature DB >> 33594197

Seeing other perspectives: evaluating the use of virtual and augmented reality to simulate visual impairments (OpenVisSim).

Pete R Jones1,2,3, Tamás Somoskeöy4, Hugo Chow-Wing-Bom5,6, David P Crabb4.   

Abstract

Simulations of visual impairment are used to educate and inform the public. However, evidence regarding their accuracy remains lacking. Here we evaluated the effectiveness of modern digital technologies to simulate the everyday difficulties caused by glaucoma. 23 normally sighted adults performed two everyday tasks that glaucoma patients often report difficulties with: a visual search task in which participants attempted to locate a mobile phone in virtual domestic environments (virtual reality (VR)), and a visual mobility task in which participants navigated a physical, room-scale environment, while impairments were overlaid using augmented reality (AR). On some trials, a gaze-contingent simulated scotoma-generated using perimetric data from a real patient with advanced glaucoma-was presented in either the superior or inferior hemifield. The main outcome measure was task completion time. Eye and head movements were also tracked and used to assess individual differences in looking behaviors. The results showed that the simulated impairments substantially impaired performance in both the VR (visual search) and AR (visual mobility) tasks (both P < 0.001). Furthermore, and in line with previous patient data: impairments were greatest when the simulated Visual Field Loss (VFL) was inferior versus superior (P < 0.001), participants made more eye and head movements in the inferior VFL condition (P < 0.001), and participants rated the inferior VFL condition as more difficult (P < 0.001). Notably, the difference in performance between the inferior and superior conditions was almost as great as the difference between a superior VFL and no impairment at all (VR: 71%; AR: 70%). We conclude that modern digital simulators are able to replicate and objectively quantify some of the key everyday difficulties associated with visual impairments. Advantages, limitations, and possible applications of current technologies are discussed. Instructions are also given for how to freely obtain the software described (OpenVisSim).

Year:  2020        PMID: 33594197     DOI: 10.1038/s41746-020-0242-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NPJ Digit Med        ISSN: 2398-6352


  44 in total

1.  Knowledge about cataract, glaucoma, and age related macular degeneration in the Hong Kong Chinese population.

Authors:  J T F Lau; V Lee; D Fan; M Lau; J Michon
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Awareness about glaucoma and related eye health attitudes in Switzerland: a survey of the general public.

Authors:  Kaweh Mansouri; Selim Orgül; Frances Meier-Gibbons; André Mermoud
Journal:  Ophthalmologica       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.250

3.  Seeing it differently: self-reported description of vision loss in dry age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Deanna J Taylor; Laura A Edwards; Alison M Binns; David P Crabb
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  How does glaucoma look?: patient perception of visual field loss.

Authors:  David P Crabb; Nicholas D Smith; Fiona C Glen; Robyn Burton; David F Garway-Heath
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  The effect of simulated visual impairment on speech-reading ability.

Authors:  Christine M Dickinson; John Taylor
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Awareness of glaucoma, and health beliefs of patients suffering primary acute angle closure.

Authors:  S-M Saw; G Gazzard; D Friedman; P J Foster; J G Devereux; M L Wong; S Seah
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  Valuing condition-specific health states using simulation contact lenses.

Authors:  Carolyn Czoski-Murray; Jill Carlton; John Brazier; Tracey Young; Natalie L Papo; Hyong Kwon Kang
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.725

Review 8.  Global causes of blindness and distance vision impairment 1990-2020: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Seth R Flaxman; Rupert R A Bourne; Serge Resnikoff; Peter Ackland; Tasanee Braithwaite; Maria V Cicinelli; Aditi Das; Jost B Jonas; Jill Keeffe; John H Kempen; Janet Leasher; Hans Limburg; Kovin Naidoo; Konrad Pesudovs; Alex Silvester; Gretchen A Stevens; Nina Tahhan; Tien Y Wong; Hugh R Taylor
Journal:  Lancet Glob Health       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 26.763

9.  Simulation contact lenses for AMD health state utility values in NICE appraisals: a different reality.

Authors:  Thomas Butt; Michael D Crossland; Peter West; Shepley W Orr; Gary S Rubin
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  Knowledge and awareness of age related eye diseases: a population-based survey.

Authors:  Marzieh Katibeh; Hossein Ziaei; Elnaz Panah; Hamid-Reza Moein; Sara Hosseini; Masumeh Kalantarion; Armen Eskandari; Mehdi Yaseri
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2014-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.