Literature DB >> 23415421

How does glaucoma look?: patient perception of visual field loss.

David P Crabb1, Nicholas D Smith, Fiona C Glen, Robyn Burton, David F Garway-Heath.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore patient perception of vision loss in glaucoma and, specifically, to test the hypothesis that patients do not recognize their impairment as a black tunnel effect or as black patches in their field of view.
DESIGN: Clinic-based cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty patients (age range, 52-82 years) with visual acuity better than 20/30 and with a range of glaucomatous visual field (VF) defects in both eyes, excluding those with very advanced disease (perimetrically blind).
METHODS: Participants underwent monocular VF testing in both eyes using a Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA; 24-2 Swedish interactive threshold algorithm standard tests) and other tests of visual function. Participants took part in a recorded interview during which they were asked if they were aware of their VF loss; if so, there were encouraged to describe it in their own words. Participants were shown 6 images modified in a variety of ways on a computer monitor and were asked to select the image that most closely represented their perception of their VF loss. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Forced choice of an image best representing glaucomatous vision impairment.
RESULTS: Participants had a range of VF defect severity: average HFA mean deviation was -8.7 dB (standard deviation [SD], 5.8 dB) and -10.5 dB (SD, 7.1 dB) in the right and left eyes, respectively. Thirteen patients (26%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 15%-40%) reported being completely unaware of their vision loss. None of the patients chose the images with a distinct black tunnel effect or black patches. Only 2 patients (4%; 95% CI, 0%-14%) chose the image with a tunnel effect with blurred edges. An image depicting blurred patches and another with missing patches was chosen by 54% (95% CI, 39%-68%) and 16% (95% CI, 7%-29%) of the patients, respectively. Content analysis of the transcripts from the recorded interviews indicated a frequent use of descriptors of visual symptoms associated with reported blur and missing features.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with glaucoma do not perceive their vision loss as a black tunnel effect or as black patches masking their field of view. These findings are important in the context of depicting the effects of glaucomatous vision loss and raising awareness for glaucoma detection. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
Copyright © 2013 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23415421     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.11.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  47 in total

Review 1.  The challenge of regenerative therapies for the optic nerve in glaucoma.

Authors:  David J Calkins; Milos Pekny; Melissa L Cooper; Larry Benowitz
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 3.467

2.  CLOCK CHART(®): a novel multi-stimulus self-check visual field screener.

Authors:  Chota Matsumoto; Mariko Eura; Sachiko Okuyama; Sonoko Takada; Eiko Arimura-Koike; Shigeki Hashimoto; Fumi Tanabe; Yoshikazu Shimomura
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 2.447

3.  Quantifying Fall-Related Hazards in the Homes of Persons with Glaucoma.

Authors:  Andrea V Yonge; Bonnielin K Swenor; Rhonda Miller; Victoria Goldhammer; Sheila K West; David S Friedman; Laura N Gitlin; Pradeep Y Ramulu
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 4.  Applications of augmented reality in ophthalmology [Invited].

Authors:  Güneş Aydındoğan; Koray Kavaklı; Afsun Şahin; Pablo Artal; Hakan Ürey
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 3.732

5.  Seeing other perspectives: evaluating the use of virtual and augmented reality to simulate visual impairments (OpenVisSim).

Authors:  Pete R Jones; Tamás Somoskeöy; Hugo Chow-Wing-Bom; David P Crabb
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2020-03-10

6.  The impact of visual symptoms on the quality of life of patients with early to moderate glaucoma.

Authors:  Young Shin Kim; Myeong Yeon Yi; Young Jae Hong; Ka Hee Park
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 2.031

7.  Effect of Age and Glaucoma on the Detection of Darks and Lights.

Authors:  Linxi Zhao; Caroline Sendek; Vandad Davoodnia; Reza Lashgari; Mitchell W Dul; Qasim Zaidi; Jose-Manuel Alonso
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Comparison of Risk Factor Profiles for Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Subtypes Defined by Pattern of Visual Field Loss: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Jae H Kang; Stephanie J Loomis; Bernard A Rosner; Janey L Wiggs; Louis R Pasquale
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 9.  [Assessment of risk factors for the occurrence of open angle glaucoma : Guidelines of the German Ophthalmological Society and the Professional Association of Ophthalmologists in Germany].

Authors: 
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 1.059

10.  A view on glaucoma--are we seeing it clearly?

Authors:  D P Crabb
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 3.775

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.