Literature DB >> 33594132

Self-incremental learning vector quantization with human cognitive biases.

Nobuhito Manome1,2, Shuji Shinohara3, Tatsuji Takahashi4, Yu Chen5, Ung-Il Chung3,6.   

Abstract

Human beings have adaptively rational cognitive biases for efficiently acquiring concepts from small-sized datasets. With such inductive biases, humans can generalize concepts by learning a small number of samples. By incorporating human cognitive biases into learning vector quantization (LVQ), a prototype-based online machine learning method, we developed self-incremental LVQ (SILVQ) methods that can be easily interpreted. We first describe a method to automatically adjust the learning rate that incorporates human cognitive biases. Second, SILVQ, which self-increases the prototypes based on the method for automatically adjusting the learning rate, is described. The performance levels of the proposed methods are evaluated in experiments employing four real and two artificial datasets. Compared with the original learning vector quantization algorithms, our methods not only effectively remove the need for parameter tuning, but also achieve higher accuracy from learning small numbers of instances. In the cases of larger numbers of instances, SILVQ can still achieve an accuracy that is equal to or better than those of existing representative LVQ algorithms. Furthermore, SILVQ can learn linearly inseparable conceptual structures with the required and sufficient number of prototypes without overfitting.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33594132     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-83182-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  21 in total

1.  Minimization of Boolean complexity in human concept learning.

Authors:  J Feldman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-10-05       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The development of a word-learning strategy.

Authors:  Justin Halberda
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2003-02

3.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.

Authors:  A Tversky; D Kahneman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-09-27       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  The mutual exclusivity bias in children's word learning.

Authors:  W E Merriman; L L Bowman
Journal:  Monogr Soc Res Child Dev       Date:  1989

5.  Children's use of mutual exclusivity to constrain the meanings of words.

Authors:  E M Markman; G F Wachtel
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Reasoning about a rule.

Authors:  P C Wason
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1968-08       Impact factor: 2.143

7.  Children's avoidance of lexical overlap: a pragmatic account.

Authors:  G Diesendruck; L Markson
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2001-09

8.  A search for symmetry in the conditional discriminations of rhesus monkeys, baboons, and children.

Authors:  M Sidman; R Rauzin; R Lazar; S Cunningham; W Tailby; P Carrigan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Human-level concept learning through probabilistic program induction.

Authors:  Brenden M Lake; Ruslan Salakhutdinov; Joshua B Tenenbaum
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Word learning as Bayesian inference.

Authors:  Fei Xu; Joshua B Tenenbaum
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  1 in total

1.  Hyperspectral imaging for chemicals identification: a human-inspired machine learning approach.

Authors:  Shai Kendler; Ziv Mano; Ran Aharoni; Raviv Raich; Barak Fishbain
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 4.996

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.