Literature DB >> 33593879

High Detection Rates of Pancreatic Cancer Across Stages by Plasma Assay of Novel Methylated DNA Markers and CA19-9.

Shounak Majumder1, William R Taylor2, Patrick H Foote2, Calise K Berger2, Chung Wah Wu2, Douglas W Mahoney3, William R Bamlet3, Kelli N Burger3, Neil Postier4, Jaime de la Fuente2, Karen A Doering2, Graham P Lidgard5, Hatim T Allawi5, Gloria M Petersen3, Suresh T Chari2, David A Ahlquist2, John B Kisiel2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We have previously identified tissue methylated DNA markers (MDMs) associated with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). In this case-control study, we aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of plasma MDMs for PDAC. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Thirteen MDMs (GRIN2D, CD1D, ZNF781, FER1L4, RYR2, CLEC11A, AK055957, LRRC4, GH05J042948, HOXA1, PRKCB, SHISA9, and NTRK3) were identified on the basis of selection criteria applied to results of prior tissue experiments and assays were optimized in plasma. Next, 340 plasma samples (170 PDAC cases and 170 controls) were assayed using target enrichment long-probe quantitative amplified signal method. Initially, 120 advanced-stage PDAC cases and 120 healthy controls were used to train a prediction algorithm at 97.5% specificity using random forest modeling. Subsequently, the locked algorithm derived from the training set was applied to an independent blinded test set of 50 early-stage PDAC cases and 50 controls. Finally, data from all 340 patients were combined, and cross-validated.
RESULTS: The cross-validated area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for the training set was 0.93 (0.89-0.96) for the MDM panel alone, 0.91 (95% confidence interval, 0.87-0.96) for carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) alone, and 0.99 (0.98-1) for the combined MDM-CA19-9 panel. In the test set of early-stage PDAC, the AUC for MDMs alone was 0.84 (0.76-0.92), CA19-9 alone was 0.87 (0.79-0.94), and combined MDM-CA19-9 panel was 0.90 (0.84-0.97) significantly better compared with either MDMs alone or CA19-9 alone (P = 0.0382 and 0.0490, respectively). At a preset specificity of 97.5%, the sensitivity for the combined panel in the test set was 80% (28%-99%) for stage I disease and 82% (68%-92%) for stage II disease. Using the combined datasets, the cross-validated AUC was 0.9 (0.86-0.94) for the MDM panel alone and 0.89 for CA19-9 alone (0.84-0.93) versus 0.97 (0.94-0.99) for the combined MDM-CA19-9 panel (P ≤ 0.0001). Overall, cross-validated sensitivity of MDM-CA19-9 panel was 92% (83%-98%), with an observed specificity of 92% at the preset specificity of 97.5%.
CONCLUSIONS: Plasma MDMs in combination with CA19-9 detect PDAC with significantly higher accuracy compared with either biomarker individually. ©2021 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33593879      PMCID: PMC8102343          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-0235

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   13.801


  37 in total

1.  Cancer statistics, 2018.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 508.702

2.  Cancer statistics, 2019.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 508.702

3.  Detection of Gastric Cancer with Novel Methylated DNA Markers: Discovery, Tissue Validation, and Pilot Testing in Plasma.

Authors:  Bradley W Anderson; Yun-Suhk Suh; Boram Choi; Hyuk-Joon Lee; Tracy C Yab; William R Taylor; Brian A Dukek; Calise K Berger; Xiaoming Cao; Patrick H Foote; Mary E Devens; Lisa A Boardman; John B Kisiel; Douglas W Mahoney; Seth W Slettedahl; Hatim T Allawi; Graham P Lidgard; Thomas C Smyrk; Han-Kwang Yang; David A Ahlquist
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  ASCO 2006 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in gastrointestinal cancer.

Authors:  Gershon Y Locker; Stanley Hamilton; Jules Harris; John M Jessup; Nancy Kemeny; John S Macdonald; Mark R Somerfield; Daniel F Hayes; Robert C Bast
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-10-23       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Combined circulating tumor DNA and protein biomarker-based liquid biopsy for the earlier detection of pancreatic cancers.

Authors:  Joshua D Cohen; Ammar A Javed; Christopher Thoburn; Fay Wong; Jeanne Tie; Peter Gibbs; C Max Schmidt; Michele T Yip-Schneider; Peter J Allen; Mark Schattner; Randall E Brand; Aatur D Singhi; Gloria M Petersen; Seung-Mo Hong; Song Cheol Kim; Massimo Falconi; Claudio Doglioni; Matthew J Weiss; Nita Ahuja; Jin He; Martin A Makary; Anirban Maitra; Samir M Hanash; Marco Dal Molin; Yuxuan Wang; Lu Li; Janine Ptak; Lisa Dobbyn; Joy Schaefer; Natalie Silliman; Maria Popoli; Michael G Goggins; Ralph H Hruban; Christopher L Wolfgang; Alison P Klein; Cristian Tomasetti; Nickolas Papadopoulos; Kenneth W Kinzler; Bert Vogelstein; Anne Marie Lennon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Diagnostic Yield From Screening Asymptomatic Individuals at High Risk for Pancreatic Cancer: A Meta-analysis of Cohort Studies.

Authors:  Juan E Corral; Karl F Mareth; Douglas L Riegert-Johnson; Ananya Das; Michael B Wallace
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-06-30       Impact factor: 11.382

Review 7.  Chronic Pancreatitis and Pancreatic Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jakob Kirkegård; Frank Viborg Mortensen; Deirdre Cronin-Fenton
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 8.  AGA Clinical Practice Update on Pancreas Cancer Screening in High-Risk Individuals: Expert Review.

Authors:  Harry R Aslanian; Jeffrey H Lee; Marcia Irene Canto
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Discovery, Validation, and Application of Novel Methylated DNA Markers for Detection of Esophageal Cancer in Plasma.

Authors:  Yi Qin; Chung W Wu; William R Taylor; Tarek Sawas; Kelli N Burger; Douglas W Mahoney; Zhifu Sun; Tracy C Yab; Graham P Lidgard; Hatim T Allawi; Navtej S Buttar; Thomas C Smyrk; Prasad G Iyer; David A Katzka; David A Ahlquist; John B Kisiel
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  Detection and localization of surgically resectable cancers with a multi-analyte blood test.

Authors:  Joshua D Cohen; Lu Li; Yuxuan Wang; Christopher Thoburn; Bahman Afsari; Ludmila Danilova; Christopher Douville; Ammar A Javed; Fay Wong; Austin Mattox; Ralph H Hruban; Christopher L Wolfgang; Michael G Goggins; Marco Dal Molin; Tian-Li Wang; Richard Roden; Alison P Klein; Janine Ptak; Lisa Dobbyn; Joy Schaefer; Natalie Silliman; Maria Popoli; Joshua T Vogelstein; James D Browne; Robert E Schoen; Randall E Brand; Jeanne Tie; Peter Gibbs; Hui-Li Wong; Aaron S Mansfield; Jin Jen; Samir M Hanash; Massimo Falconi; Peter J Allen; Shibin Zhou; Chetan Bettegowda; Luis A Diaz; Cristian Tomasetti; Kenneth W Kinzler; Bert Vogelstein; Anne Marie Lennon; Nickolas Papadopoulos
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Early detection of pancreatic cancer: current state and future opportunities.

Authors:  Guru Trikudanathan; Emil Lou; Anirban Maitra; Shounak Majumder
Journal:  Curr Opin Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 2.741

Review 2.  Circulating tumour DNA: a challenging innovation to develop "precision onco-surgery" in pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Daniel Pietrasz; Elisabetta Sereni; Francesco Lancelotti; Antonio Pea; Claudio Luchini; Giulio Innamorati; Roberto Salvia; Claudio Bassi
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 9.075

3.  Liquid biopsy, using a novel DNA methylation signature, distinguishes pancreatic adenocarcinoma from benign pancreatic disease.

Authors:  Lukas Vrba; Bernard W Futscher; Marc Oshiro; George S Watts; Emmanuel Menashi; Charles Hu; Hytham Hammad; Daniel R Pennington; Umamaheshwari Golconda; Hemanth Gavini; Denise J Roe; Rachna T Shroff; Mark A Nelson
Journal:  Clin Epigenetics       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 6.551

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.