Laura van Wijk1, Lizzel van der Snee2, Carlijn I Buis2, Judith E K R Hentzen2, Marjolein E Haveman2, Joost M Klaase2. 1. Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical Centre Groningen, PO Box 30001, 9700, RB, Groningen, The Netherlands. l.van.wijk@umcg.nl. 2. Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical Centre Groningen, PO Box 30001, 9700, RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Despite improvements in perioperative care, major abdominal surgery continues to be associated with significant perioperative morbidity. Accurate preoperative risk stratification and optimisation (prehabilitation) are necessary to reduce perioperative morbidity. This study evaluated the screening and assessment of modifiable risk factors amendable for prehabilitation interventions and measured the patient compliance rate with recommended interventions. METHOD: Between May 2019 and January 2020, patients referred to our hospital for HPB surgery were screened and assessed on six modifiable preoperative risk factors. The risk factors and screening tools used, with cutoff values, included (i) low physical fitness (a 6-min walk test < 82% of patient's calculated norm and/or patient's activity level not meeting the global recommendations on physical activity for health). Patients who were unfit based on the screening were assessed with a cardiopulmonary exercise test (anaerobic threshold ≤ 11 mL/kg/min); (ii) malnutrition (patient-generated subjective global assessment ≥ 4); (iii) iron-deficiency anaemia (haemoglobin < 12 g/dL for women, < 13 g/dL for men and transferrin saturation ≤ 20%); (iv) frailty (Groningen frailty indicator/Robinson frailty score ≥ 4); (v) substance use (smoking and alcohol use of > 5 units per week) and (vi) low psychological resilience (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale ≥ 8). Patients had a consultation with the surgeon on the same day as their screening. High-risk patients were referred for necessary interventions. RESULTS: One hundred consecutive patients were screened at our prehabilitation outpatient clinic. The prevalence of high-risk patients per risk factor was 64% for low physical fitness, 42% for malnutrition, 32% for anaemia (in 47% due to iron deficiency), 22% for frailty, 12% for smoking, 18% for alcohol use and 21% for low psychological resilience. Of the 77 patients who were eventually scheduled for surgery, 53 (68.8%) needed at least one intervention, of whom 28 (52.8%) complied with 100% of the necessary interventions. The median (IQR) number of interventions needed in the 77 patients was 1.0 (0-2). CONCLUSION: It is feasible to screen and assess all patients referred for HPB cancer surgery for six modifiable risk factors. Most of the patients had at least one risk factor that could be optimised. However, compliance with the suggested interventions remains challenging.
INTRODUCTION: Despite improvements in perioperative care, major abdominal surgery continues to be associated with significant perioperative morbidity. Accurate preoperative risk stratification and optimisation (prehabilitation) are necessary to reduce perioperative morbidity. This study evaluated the screening and assessment of modifiable risk factors amendable for prehabilitation interventions and measured the patient compliance rate with recommended interventions. METHOD: Between May 2019 and January 2020, patients referred to our hospital for HPB surgery were screened and assessed on six modifiable preoperative risk factors. The risk factors and screening tools used, with cutoff values, included (i) low physical fitness (a 6-min walk test < 82% of patient's calculated norm and/or patient's activity level not meeting the global recommendations on physical activity for health). Patients who were unfit based on the screening were assessed with a cardiopulmonary exercise test (anaerobic threshold ≤ 11 mL/kg/min); (ii) malnutrition (patient-generated subjective global assessment ≥ 4); (iii) iron-deficiency anaemia (haemoglobin < 12 g/dL for women, < 13 g/dL for men and transferrin saturation ≤ 20%); (iv) frailty (Groningen frailty indicator/Robinson frailty score ≥ 4); (v) substance use (smoking and alcohol use of > 5 units per week) and (vi) low psychological resilience (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale ≥ 8). Patients had a consultation with the surgeon on the same day as their screening. High-risk patients were referred for necessary interventions. RESULTS: One hundred consecutive patients were screened at our prehabilitation outpatient clinic. The prevalence of high-risk patients per risk factor was 64% for low physical fitness, 42% for malnutrition, 32% for anaemia (in 47% due to iron deficiency), 22% for frailty, 12% for smoking, 18% for alcohol use and 21% for low psychological resilience. Of the 77 patients who were eventually scheduled for surgery, 53 (68.8%) needed at least one intervention, of whom 28 (52.8%) complied with 100% of the necessary interventions. The median (IQR) number of interventions needed in the 77 patients was 1.0 (0-2). CONCLUSION: It is feasible to screen and assess all patients referred for HPB cancer surgery for six modifiable risk factors. Most of the patients had at least one risk factor that could be optimised. However, compliance with the suggested interventions remains challenging.
Entities:
Keywords:
Prehabilitation; Preoperative care pathway; Risk stratification; Screening
Authors: William Dale; Joshua Hemmerich; Alaine Kamm; Mitchell C Posner; Jeffrey B Matthews; Randi Rothman; Aparna Palakodeti; Kevin K Roggin Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Francesco Carli; Julie K Silver; Liane S Feldman; Andrea McKee; Sean Gilman; Chelsia Gillis; Celena Scheede-Bergdahl; Ann Gamsa; Nicole Stout; Bradford Hirsch Journal: Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am Date: 2017-02 Impact factor: 1.784
Authors: A Barberan-Garcia; M Ubre; N Pascual-Argente; R Risco; J Faner; J Balust; A M Lacy; J Puig-Junoy; J Roca; G Martinez-Palli Journal: Br J Anaesth Date: 2019-06-25 Impact factor: 9.166
Authors: Francesco Carli; Guillaume Bousquet-Dion; Rashami Awasthi; Noha Elsherbini; Sender Liberman; Marylise Boutros; Barry Stein; Patrick Charlebois; Gabriela Ghitulescu; Nancy Morin; Thomas Jagoe; Celena Scheede-Bergdahl; Enrico Maria Minnella; Julio F Fiore Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2020-03-01 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Annefleur E M Berkel; Bart C Bongers; Marie-Janne S van Kamp; Hayke Kotte; Paul Weltevreden; Frans H C de Jongh; Michiel M M Eijsvogel; A N Machteld Wymenga; Marloes Bigirwamungu-Bargeman; Job van der Palen; Marc J van Det; Nico L U van Meeteren; Joost M Klaase Journal: BMC Gastroenterol Date: 2018-02-21 Impact factor: 3.067
Authors: Bernd Froessler; Peter Palm; Ingo Weber; Nicolette A Hodyl; Rajvinder Singh; Elizabeth M Murphy Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2016-07 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Wesley D Jetten; Rianne N M Hogenbirk; Nico L U Van Meeteren; Frans J C Cuperus; Joost M Klaase; Renate De Jong Journal: Transpl Int Date: 2022-09-08 Impact factor: 3.842
Authors: Femke A van der Zant; Bob J L Kooijman; Judith E K R Hentzen; Wijnand Helfrich; Emily M Ploeg; Robert J van Ginkel; Barbara L van Leeuwen; Lukas B Been; Joost M Klaase; Patrick H J Hemmer; Christian S van der Hilst; Schelto Kruijff Journal: BJS Open Date: 2022-09-02