Literature DB >> 33593351

The fly liquid-food electroshock assay (FLEA) suggests opposite roles for neuropeptide F in avoidance of bitterness and shock.

Puskar Mishra1,2, Shany E Yang1, Austin B Montgomery1, Addison R Reed1, Aylin R Rodan1,3,4,5, Adrian Rothenfluh6,7,8,9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Proper regulation of feeding is important for an organism's well-being and survival and involves a motivational component directing the search for food. Dissecting the molecular and neural mechanisms of motivated feeding behavior requires assays that allow quantification of both motivation and food intake. Measurements of motivated behavior usually involve assessing physical effort or overcoming an aversive stimulus. Food intake in Drosophila can be determined in a number of ways, including by measuring the time a fly's proboscis interacts with a food source associated with an electrical current in the fly liquid-food interaction counter (FLIC). Here, we show that electrical current flowing through flies during this interaction is aversive, and we describe a modified assay to measure motivation in Drosophila.
RESULTS: Food intake is reduced during the interaction with FLIC when the electrical current is turned on, which provides a confounding variable in studies of motivated behavior. Based on the FLIC, we engineer a novel assay, the fly liquid-food electroshock assay (FLEA), which allows for current adjustments for each feeding well. Using the FLEA, we show that both external incentives and internal motivational state can serve as drivers for flies to overcome higher current (electric shock) to obtain superior food. Unlike similar assays in which bitterness is the aversive stimulus for the fly to overcome, we show that current perception is not discounted as flies become more food-deprived. Finally, we use genetically manipulated flies to show that neuropeptide F, an orthologue of mammalian NPY previously implicated in regulation of feeding motivation, is required for sensory processing of electrical current.
CONCLUSION: The FLEA is therefore a novel assay to accurately measure incentive motivation in Drosophila. Using the FLEA, we also show that neuropeptide F is required for proper perception or processing of an electroshock, a novel function for this neuropeptide involved in the processing of external and internal stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33593351      PMCID: PMC7888162          DOI: 10.1186/s12915-021-00969-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Biol        ISSN: 1741-7007            Impact factor:   7.364


  25 in total

1.  Sexual deprivation increases ethanol intake in Drosophila.

Authors:  G Shohat-Ophir; K R Kaun; R Azanchi; H Mohammed; U Heberlein
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  A Neural Circuit for the Suppression of Pain by a Competing Need State.

Authors:  Amber L Alhadeff; Zhenwei Su; Elen Hernandez; Michelle L Klima; Sophie Z Phillips; Ruby A Holland; Caiying Guo; Adam W Hantman; Bart C De Jonghe; J Nicholas Betley
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Regulation of aversion to noxious food by Drosophila neuropeptide Y- and insulin-like systems.

Authors:  Qi Wu; Zhangwu Zhao; Ping Shen
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-09-18       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Brain stimulation and the motivation of behavior.

Authors:  J Olds
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 2.453

5.  Dissection of the Drosophila neuropeptide F circuit using a high-throughput two-choice assay.

Authors:  Lisha Shao; Mathias Saver; Phuong Chung; Qingzhong Ren; Tzumin Lee; Clement F Kent; Ulrike Heberlein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Prandiology of Drosophila and the CAFE assay.

Authors:  William W Ja; Gil B Carvalho; Elizabeth M Mak; Noelle N de la Rosa; Annie Y Fang; Jonathan C Liong; Ted Brummel; Seymour Benzer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Long-lasting, experience-dependent alcohol preference in Drosophila.

Authors:  Raniero L Peru Y Colón de Portugal; Shamsideen A Ojelade; Pranav S Penninti; Rachel J Dove; Matthew J Nye; Summer F Acevedo; Antonio Lopez; Aylin R Rodan; Adrian Rothenfluh
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 4.280

Review 8.  100 years of Drosophila research and its impact on vertebrate neuroscience: a history lesson for the future.

Authors:  Hugo J Bellen; Chao Tong; Hiroshi Tsuda
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 34.870

9.  FLIC: high-throughput, continuous analysis of feeding behaviors in Drosophila.

Authors:  Jennifer Ro; Zachary M Harvanek; Scott D Pletcher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Automated monitoring and quantitative analysis of feeding behaviour in Drosophila.

Authors:  Pavel M Itskov; José-Maria Moreira; Ekaterina Vinnik; Gonçalo Lopes; Steve Safarik; Michael H Dickinson; Carlos Ribeiro
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  The Use of Drosophila to Understand Psychostimulant Responses.

Authors:  Travis James Philyaw; Adrian Rothenfluh; Iris Titos
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-01-06
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.