Literature DB >> 33593301

Feasibility, effectiveness, and safety of endoscopic vacuum therapy for intrathoracic anastomotic leakage following transthoracic esophageal resection.

Chengcheng Christine Zhang1, Lukas Liesenfeld2, Rosa Klotz2, Ronald Koschny3, Christian Rupp3, Thomas Schmidt2, Markus K Diener2, Beat P Müller-Stich2, Thilo Hackert2, Peter Sauer3, Markus W Büchler2, Anja Schaible2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leakage (AL) in the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. Especially intrathoracic anastomotic leakage leads to life-threatening complications. Endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) for anastomotic leakage after transthoracic esophageal resection represents a novel concept. However, sound clinical data are still scarce. This retrospective, single-center study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, effectiveness, and safety of EVT for intrathoracic anastomotic leakage following abdomino-thoracic esophageal resection. <br> METHODS: From March 2014 to September 2019 259 consecutive patients underwent elective transthoracic esophageal resection. 72 patients (27.8%) suffered from AL. The overall collective in-hospital mortality rate was 3.9% (n = 10). Data from those who underwent treatment with EVT were included. <br> RESULTS: Fifty-five patients were treated with EVT. Successful closure was achieved in 89.1% (n = 49) by EVT only. The EVT-associated complication rate was 5.4% (n = 3): bleeding occurred in one patient, while minor sedation-related complications were observed in two patients. The median number of EVT procedures per patient was 3. The procedures were performed at intervals of 3-5 days, with a 14-day median duration of therapy. The mortality rate of patients with AL was 7.2% (n = 4). Despite successfully terminated EVT, three patients died because of multiple organ failure, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and urosepsis (5.4%). One patient (1.8%) died during EVT due to cardiac arrest. <br> CONCLUSIONS: EVT is a safe and effective approach for intrathoracic anastomotic leakages following abdomino-thoracic esophageal resections. It offers a high leakage-closure rate and the potential to lower leakage-related mortalities. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered and approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of the University of Heidelberg on 16.04.2014 (Registration Number: S-635/2013).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anastomotic leakage; Endoscopic vacuum therapy; Endoscopy; Negative-pressure therapy; Postoperative complications

Year:  2021        PMID: 33593301      PMCID: PMC7885467          DOI: 10.1186/s12876-021-01651-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1471-230X            Impact factor:   3.067


  51 in total

1.  Outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy: review of over 1000 patients.

Authors:  James D Luketich; Arjun Pennathur; Omar Awais; Ryan M Levy; Samuel Keeley; Manisha Shende; Neil A Christie; Benny Weksler; Rodney J Landreneau; Ghulam Abbas; Matthew J Schuchert; Katie S Nason
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Benchmarking Complications Associated with Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Donald E Low; Madhan Kumar Kuppusamy; Derek Alderson; Ivan Cecconello; Andrew C Chang; Gail Darling; Andrew Davies; Xavier Benoit D'Journo; Suzanne S Gisbertz; S Michael Griffin; Richard Hardwick; Arnulf Hoelscher; Wayne Hofstetter; Blair Jobe; Yuko Kitagawa; Simon Law; Christophe Mariette; Nick Maynard; Christopher R Morse; Philippe Nafteux; Manuel Pera; C S Pramesh; Sonia Puig; John V Reynolds; Wolfgang Schroeder; Mark Smithers; B P L Wijnhoven
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Successful closure of defects in the upper gastrointestinal tract by endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT): a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Mike G Laukoetter; Rudolf Mennigen; Philipp A Neumann; Sameer Dhayat; Gabriele Horst; Daniel Palmes; Norbert Senninger; Thorsten Vowinkel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Surya S A Y Biere; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Kirsten W Maas; Luigi Bonavina; Camiel Rosman; Josep Roig Garcia; Suzanne S Gisbertz; Jean H G Klinkenbijl; Markus W Hollmann; Elly S M de Lange; H Jaap Bonjer; Donald L van der Peet; Miguel A Cuesta
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Selective management of intrathoracic anastomotic leak after esophagectomy.

Authors:  Juan A Crestanello; Claude Deschamps; Stephen D Cassivi; Francis C Nichols; Mark S Allen; Cathy Schleck; Peter C Pairolero
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  Defining Benchmarks for Transthoracic Esophagectomy: A Multicenter Analysis of Total Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy in Low Risk Patients.

Authors:  Henner M Schmidt; Susanne S Gisbertz; Johnny Moons; Ioannis Rouvelas; Juha Kauppi; Andrew Brown; Emanuele Asti; Misha Luyer; Sjoerd M Lagarde; Felix Berlth; Annouck Philippron; Christiane Bruns; Arnulf Hölscher; Paul M Schneider; Dimitri A Raptis; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Philippe Nafteux; Magnus Nilsson; Jari Räsanen; Francesco Palazzo; Ernest Rosato; Stuart Mercer; Luigi Bonavina; Grard Nieuwenhuijzen; Bas P L Wijnhoven; Wolfgang Schröder; Piet Pattyn; Peter P Grimminger; Christian A Gutschow
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Endoscopic endoluminal vacuum therapy is superior to other regimens in managing anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy: a comparative retrospective study.

Authors:  Bodo Schniewind; Clemens Schafmayer; Gesa Voehrs; Jan Egberts; Witigo von Schoenfels; Tobias Rose; Roland Kurdow; Alexander Arlt; Mark Ellrichmann; Christian Jürgensen; Stefan Schreiber; Thomas Becker; Jochen Hampe
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-05-25       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus.

Authors:  Jan B F Hulscher; Johanna W van Sandick; Angela G E M de Boer; Bas P L Wijnhoven; Jan G P Tijssen; Paul Fockens; Peep F M Stalmeier; Fiebo J W ten Kate; Herman van Dekken; Huug Obertop; Hugo W Tilanus; J Jan B van Lanschot
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-11-21       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Mortality secondary to esophageal anastomotic leak.

Authors:  Khaled Alanezi; John D Urschel
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.520

Review 10.  Reporting of short-term clinical outcomes after esophagectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Natalie S Blencowe; Sean Strong; Angus G K McNair; Sara T Brookes; Tom Crosby; S Michael Griffin; Jane M Blazeby
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Endoscopic Management for Post-Surgical Complications after Resection of Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Dörte Wichmann; Stefano Fusco; Christoph R Werner; Sabrina Voesch; Benedikt Duckworth-Mothes; Ulrich Schweizer; Dietmar Stüker; Alfred Königsrainer; Karolin Thiel; Markus Quante
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 6.639

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.