Literature DB >> 33591280

A Social Media Campaign (#datasaveslives) to Promote the Benefits of Using Health Data for Research Purposes: Mixed Methods Analysis.

Goran Nenadic1, Mary Patricia Tully2, Lamiece Hassan3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Social media provides the potential to engage a wide audience about scientific research, including the public. However, little empirical research exists to guide health scientists regarding what works and how to optimize impact. We examined the social media campaign #datasaveslives established in 2014 to highlight positive examples of the use and reuse of health data in research.
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to examine how the #datasaveslives hashtag was used on social media, how often, and by whom; thus, we aim to provide insights into the impact of a major social media campaign in the UK health informatics research community and further afield.
METHODS: We analyzed all publicly available posts (tweets) that included the hashtag #datasaveslives (N=13,895) on the microblogging platform Twitter between September 1, 2016, and August 31, 2017. Using a combination of qualitative and quantitative analyses, we determined the frequency and purpose of tweets. Social network analysis was used to analyze and visualize tweet sharing (retweet) networks among hashtag users.
RESULTS: Overall, we found 4175 original posts and 9720 retweets featuring #datasaveslives by 3649 unique Twitter users. In total, 66.01% (2756/4175) of the original posts were retweeted at least once. Higher frequencies of tweets were observed during the weeks of prominent policy publications, popular conferences, and public engagement events. Cluster analysis based on retweet relationships revealed an interconnected series of groups of #datasaveslives users in academia, health services and policy, and charities and patient networks. Thematic analysis of tweets showed that #datasaveslives was used for a broader range of purposes than indexing information, including event reporting, encouraging participation and action, and showing personal support for data sharing.
CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that a hashtag-based social media campaign was effective in encouraging a wide audience of stakeholders to disseminate positive examples of health research. Furthermore, the findings suggest that the campaign supported community building and bridging practices within and between the interdisciplinary sectors related to the field of health data science and encouraged individuals to demonstrate personal support for sharing health data. ©Lamiece Hassan, Goran Nenadic, Mary Patricia Tully. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 16.02.2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  medical research; public engagement; social media; social network analysis

Year:  2021        PMID: 33591280      PMCID: PMC7925154          DOI: 10.2196/16348

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Internet Res        ISSN: 1438-8871            Impact factor:   5.428


  22 in total

1.  Twitter as a tool for communication and knowledge exchange in academic medicine: A guide for skeptics and novices.

Authors:  Esther K Choo; Megan L Ranney; Teresa M Chan; N Seth Trueger; Amy E Walsh; Ken Tegtmeyer; Shannon O McNamara; Ricky Y Choi; Christopher L Carroll
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 3.650

2.  Social media campaigns that make a difference: what can public health learn from the corporate sector and other social change marketers?

Authors:  Becky Freeman; Sofia Potente; Vanessa Rock; Jacqueline McIver
Journal:  Public Health Res Pract       Date:  2015-03-30

3.  Online collaboration: Scientists and the social network.

Authors:  Richard Van Noorden
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Twitter and nursing research: how diffusion of innovation theory can help uptake.

Authors:  Mandy M Archibald; Alexander M Clark
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.187

5.  Trust in the time of markets: protecting patient information.

Authors:  Allyson M Pollock; Peter Roderick
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-05-03       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Live coverage of scientific conferences using web technologies.

Authors:  Allyson L Lister; Ruchira S Datta; Oliver Hofmann; Roland Krause; Michael Kuhn; Bettina Roth; Reinhard Schneider
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  Ten simple rules of live tweeting at scientific conferences.

Authors:  Sean Ekins; Ethan O Perlstein
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  Astrophysicists' conversational connections on Twitter.

Authors:  Kim Holmberg; Timothy D Bowman; Stefanie Haustein; Isabella Peters
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  How Are Scientists Using Social Media in the Workplace?

Authors:  Kimberley Collins; David Shiffman; Jenny Rock
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Follow #eHealth2011: Measuring the Role and Effectiveness of Online and Social Media in Increasing the Outreach of a Scientific Conference.

Authors:  Marcel Winandy; Patty Kostkova; Ed de Quincey; Connie St Louis; Martin Szomszor
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 5.428

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.