Literature DB >> 25119221

Online collaboration: Scientists and the social network.

Richard Van Noorden.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2014        PMID： 25119221     DOI： 10.1038/512126a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN： 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


× No keyword cloud information.
  45 in total

1.  What do computer scientists tweet? Analyzing the link-sharing practice on Twitter.

Authors:  Marco Schmitt; Robert Jäschke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 2.  Using e-technologies in clinical trials.

Authors:  Carmen Rosa; Aimee N C Campbell; Gloria M Miele; Meg Brunner; Erin L Winstanley
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2015-07-12       Impact factor: 2.226

3.  Social Media Influence Does Not Reflect Scholarly or Clinical Activity in Real Life.

Authors:  Brian Zenger; J Michael Swink; Jeffrey L Turner; T Jared Bunch; John J Ryan; Rashmee U Shah; Mintu P Turakhia; Jonathan P Piccini; Benjamin A Steinberg
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2020-10-08

Review 4.  Getting Started: A Social Media Primer.

Authors:  Dalya M Ferguson; Lillian S Kao
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-09-12

Review 5.  [Fridays for future! - All days for surgery! : Thoughts of young surgeons on a modern promotion of the next generation].

Authors:  Tobias Huber; Florentine Hüttl; Benedikt Braun; Beate Blank; Stefanie Schierholz; Tobias Fritz; Juliane Kroeplin
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 0.955

6.  Trends in rotator cuff surgery: Research through the decades.

Authors:  Aparna Viswanath; Puneet Monga
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-04-19

7.  A critical evaluation of science outreach via social media: its role and impact on scientists.

Authors:  Craig McClain; Liz Neeley
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2014-12-09

8.  Grant application review: the case of transparency.

Authors:  David Gurwitz; Elena Milanesi; Thomas Koenig
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 8.029

9.  The Reputational Consequences of Failed Replications and Wrongness Admission among Scientists.

Authors:  Adam K Fetterman; Kai Sassenberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  What does the UK public want from academic science communication?

Authors:  James Redfern; Sam Illingworth; Joanna Verran
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2016-06-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.