Literature DB >> 12555059

Factors associated with site of death: a national study of where people die.

Sherry Weitzen1, Joan M Teno, Mary Fennell, Vincent Mor.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Recent public attention has focused on quality of care for the dying. Where one dies is an important individual and public health concern.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The 1993 National Mortality Followback Survey (NMFS) was used to estimate the proportion of deaths occurring at home, in a hospital, or in a nursing home. Sociodemographic variables, underlying cause of death, geographic region, hospice use, social support, health insurance, patients' physical limitations, and physical decline were considered as possible predictors of site of death. The relationship between these predictors and site death with multinomial logistic regression methods was analyzed.
RESULTS: Nearly 60% of deaths occurred in hospitals, and approximately 20% of deaths took place at home or in nursing homes. Decedents, who were black, less educated, and enrolled in an HMO were more likely to die in the hospital. After adjustment, functional decline in the last 5 months of life was an important predictor of dying at home (for loss of 3 or more ADLs [OR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.11-2.21]). Having functional limitations 1 year before death, and experiencing functional decline in the last 5 months of life were both associated with dying in a nursing home.
CONCLUSIONS: Rapid physical decline during the last 5 months was associated with dying at home or in a nursing home, whereas earlier functional loss was associated with dying in a nursing home.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12555059     DOI: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000044913.37084.27

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  54 in total

1.  Nursing homes and cancer care.

Authors:  Mary L Fennell
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 2.  Engaging Patients With Advance Directives Using an Information Visualization Approach.

Authors:  Janet Woollen; Suzanne Bakken
Journal:  J Gerontol Nurs       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 1.254

Review 3.  Factors influencing death at home in terminally ill patients with cancer: systematic review.

Authors:  Barbara Gomes; Irene J Higginson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-02-08

4.  Hospitalizations at the end of life among long-term care residents.

Authors:  Verena H Menec; Scott Nowicki; Audrey Blandford; Dawn Veselyuk
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 6.053

5.  Factors associated with place of death for elderly Japanese-American men: the Honolulu Heart Program and Honolulu-Asia Aging Study.

Authors:  Christina L Bell; James Davis; Rosanne C Harrigan; Emese Somogyi-Zalud; Marianne K G Tanabe; Kamal H Masaki
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 5.562

Review 6.  End-of-life care--what do cancer patients want?

Authors:  Shaheen A Khan; Barbara Gomes; Irene J Higginson
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 7.  Barriers to excellent end-of-life care for patients with dementia.

Authors:  Greg A Sachs; Joseph W Shega; Deon Cox-Hayley
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Place of death among older Americans: does state spending on home- and community-based services promote home death?

Authors:  Naoko Muramatsu; Ruby L Hoyem; Hongjun Yin; Richard T Campbell
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Association of hospice patients' income and care level with place of death.

Authors:  Joshua S Barclay; Maragatha Kuchibhatla; James A Tulsky; Kimberly S Johnson
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 21.873

Review 10.  Communication in end-stage cancer: review of the literature and future research.

Authors:  Elizabeth D Trice; Holly G Prigerson
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2009
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.