| Literature DB >> 33589680 |
Yasutaka Tsuda1,2, Jessiel Siaron Gueriba3,4, Takamasa Makino5, Wilson Agerico Diño6,7, Akitaka Yoshigoe8, Michio Okada9,10.
Abstract
We bombarded [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] with a 2.3 eV hyperthermal oxygen molecular beam (HOMB) source, and characterized the corresponding (oxide) surfaces with synchrotron-radiation X-ray photoemission spectroscopy (SR-XPS). At [Formula: see text], CuO forms on both [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]. When we increase the surface temperature to [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] also forms on [Formula: see text], but not on [Formula: see text]. For comparison, [Formula: see text] forms even at [Formula: see text] on Cu(111). On [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] forms only after [Formula: see text], and no oxides can be found at [Formula: see text]. We ascribe this difference in Cu oxide formation to the mobility of the interfacial species (Cu/Pd/Pt) and charge transfer between the surface Cu oxides and subsurface species (Cu/Pd/Pt).Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33589680 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-82180-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379