Literature DB >> 33588885

Cost-effectiveness analysis of text messaging to support health advice for smoking cessation.

Raquel Cobos-Campos1, Javier Mar2,3,4, Antxon Apiñaniz5,6,7, Arantza Sáez de Lafuente5, Naiara Parraza5, Felipe Aizpuru7,8,9, Gorka Orive10,11,12,13,14.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Smoking in one of the most serious public health problems. It is well known that it constitutes a major risk factor for chronic diseases and the leading cause of preventable death worldwide. Due to high prevalence of smokers, new cost-effective strategies seeking to increase smoking cessation rates are needed.
METHODS: We performed a Markov model-based cost-effectiveness analysis comparing two treatments: health advice provided by general practitioners and nurses in primary care, and health advice reinforced by sending motivational text messages to smokers' mobile phones. A Markov model was used in which smokers transitioned between three mutually exclusive health states (smoker, former smoker and dead) after 6-month cycles. We calculated the cost-effectiveness ratio associated with the sending of motivational messages. Health care and society perspectives (separately) was adopted. Costs taken into account were direct health care costs and direct health care cost and costs for lost productivity, respectively. Additionally, deterministic sensitivity analysis was performed modifying the probability of smoking cessation with each option.
RESULTS: Sending of text messages as a tool to support health advice was found to be cost-effective as it was associated with increases in costs of €7.4 and €1,327 per QALY gained (ICUR) for men and women respectively from a healthcare perspective, significantly far from the published cost-effectiveness threshold. From a societal perspective, the combined programmed was dominant.
CONCLUSIONS: Sending text messages is a cost-effective approach. These findings support the implantation of the combined program across primary care health centres.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cost of illness, MeSH unique ID: D017281; Costs and cost analysis, MeSH unique ID: D003365; Quality-adjusted life years, MeSH unique ID: D019057; Smoking cessation, MeSH unique ID: D016540; Text messaging, MeSH unique ID: D060145

Year:  2021        PMID: 33588885      PMCID: PMC7885425          DOI: 10.1186/s12962-021-00262-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc        ISSN: 1478-7547


  4 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of smoking cessation interventions using cell phones in a low-income population.

Authors:  Allan T Daly; Ashish A Deshmukh; Damon J Vidrine; Alexander V Prokhorov; Summer G Frank; Patricia D Tahay; Maggie E Houchen; Scott B Cantor
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2018-06-09       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  The lifetime cost of injury.

Authors:  W Max; D P Rice; E J MacKenzie
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.730

3.  Effectiveness of a stepped primary care smoking cessation intervention: cluster randomized clinical trial (ISTAPS study).

Authors:  Carmen Cabezas; Mamta Advani; Diana Puente; Teresa Rodriguez-Blanco; Carlos Martin
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 6.526

4.  [Long-term cost-effectiveness of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in acute coronary syndrome in Spain].

Authors:  E Molina-Cuadrado; H Mateo-Carrasco; P Nieto-Guindo; P Rodríguez-Gómez
Journal:  Farm Hosp       Date:  2014-07-01
  4 in total
  4 in total

1.  Evaluating the Efficacy of Automated Smoking Treatment for People With HIV: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Damon J Vidrine; Thanh C Bui; Michael S Businelle; Ya-Chen Tina Shih; Steven K Sutton; Lokesh Shahani; Diana Stewart Hoover; Kristina Bowles; Jennifer I Vidrine
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2021-11-17

2.  Comparison of an automated smartphone-based smoking cessation intervention versus standard quitline-delivered treatment among underserved smokers: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jennifer I Vidrine; Ya-Chen Tina Shih; Michael S Businelle; Steven K Sutton; Diana Stewart Hoover; Cherell Cottrell-Daniels; Bethany Shorey Fennell; Kristina E Bowles; Damon J Vidrine
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 4.135

3.  Comparing the effects of SMS-based education with group-based education and control group on diabetes management: a randomized educational program.

Authors:  Hourvash Haghighinejad; Leila Liaghat; Fatemeh Malekpour; Peyman Jafari; Kaveh Taghipour; Mehrdad Rezaie; Parisa Jooya; Hamidreza Ghazipoor; Mani Ramzi
Journal:  BMC Prim Care       Date:  2022-08-19

4.  A Method to Deliver Automated and Tailored Intervention Content: 24-month Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Hailey N Miller; Corrine I Voils; Kate A Cronin; Elizabeth Jeanes; Jeffrey Hawley; Laura S Porter; Rachel R Adler; Whitney Sharp; Samantha Pabich; Kara L Gavin; Megan A Lewis; Heather M Johnson; William S Yancy; Kristen E Gray; Ryan J Shaw
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2022-09-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.