Naykky Singh Ospina1, Maria Papaleontiou2. 1. Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, 32606. 2. Division of Metabolism, Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109. Electronic address: mpapaleo@med.umich.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Contextualizing the evaluation of older adults with thyroid nodules is necessary to fully understand which management strategy is the most appropriate. Our goal was to summarize available clinical evidence to provide guidance in the care of older adults with thyroid nodules and highlight special considerations for thyroid nodule evaluation and management in this population. METHODS: We conducted a literature search of PubMed and Ovid MEDLINE from January 2000 to November 2020 to identify relevant peer-reviewed articles published in English. References from the included articles as well as articles identified by the authors were also reviewed. RESULTS: The prevalence of thyroid nodules increases with age. Although thyroid nodules in older adults have a lower risk of malignancy, identified cancers are more likely to be of high-risk histology. The goals of thyroid nodule evaluation and the tools used for diagnosis are similar for older and younger patients with thyroid nodules. However, limited evidence exists regarding thyroid nodule evaluation and management to guide personalized decision making in the geriatric population. CONCLUSION: Considering patient context is significant in the diagnosis and management of thyroid nodules in older adults. When making management decisions in this population, it is essential to carefully weigh the risks and benefits of thyroid nodule diagnosis and treatment, in view of older adults' higher prevalence of high-risk thyroid cancer as well as increased risk for multimorbidity, functional and cognitive decline, and treatment complications.
OBJECTIVE: Contextualizing the evaluation of older adults with thyroid nodules is necessary to fully understand which management strategy is the most appropriate. Our goal was to summarize available clinical evidence to provide guidance in the care of older adults with thyroid nodules and highlight special considerations for thyroid nodule evaluation and management in this population. METHODS: We conducted a literature search of PubMed and Ovid MEDLINE from January 2000 to November 2020 to identify relevant peer-reviewed articles published in English. References from the included articles as well as articles identified by the authors were also reviewed. RESULTS: The prevalence of thyroid nodules increases with age. Although thyroid nodules in older adults have a lower risk of malignancy, identified cancers are more likely to be of high-risk histology. The goals of thyroid nodule evaluation and the tools used for diagnosis are similar for older and younger patients with thyroid nodules. However, limited evidence exists regarding thyroid nodule evaluation and management to guide personalized decision making in the geriatric population. CONCLUSION: Considering patient context is significant in the diagnosis and management of thyroid nodules in older adults. When making management decisions in this population, it is essential to carefully weigh the risks and benefits of thyroid nodule diagnosis and treatment, in view of older adults' higher prevalence of high-risk thyroid cancer as well as increased risk for multimorbidity, functional and cognitive decline, and treatment complications.
Authors: Erik K Alexander; Giulia C Kennedy; Zubair W Baloch; Edmund S Cibas; Darya Chudova; James Diggans; Lyssa Friedman; Richard T Kloos; Virginia A LiVolsi; Susan J Mandel; Stephen S Raab; Juan Rosai; David L Steward; P Sean Walsh; Jonathan I Wilde; Martha A Zeiger; Richard B Lanman; Bryan R Haugen Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-06-25 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Laura Y Wang; Andrew W Smith; Frank L Palmer; R Michael Tuttle; Azhar Mahrous; Iain J Nixon; Snehal G Patel; Ian Ganly; James A Fagin; Laura Boucai Journal: Thyroid Date: 2014-12-16 Impact factor: 6.568
Authors: Andrea R Marcadis; Pablo Valderrabano; Allen S Ho; Justin Tepe; Christina E Swartzwelder; Serena Byrd; Wendy L Sacks; Brian R Untch; Ashok R Shaha; Bin Xu; Oscar Lin; Ronald A Ghossein; Richard J Wong; Jennifer L Marti; Luc G T Morris Journal: Surgery Date: 2018-10-22 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Young Ki Lee; Namki Hong; Se Hee Park; Dong Yeob Shin; Cho Rok Lee; Sang-Wook Kang; Jandee Lee; Jong Ju Jeong; Kee-Hyun Nam; Woong Youn Chung; Eun Jig Lee Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-08-07 Impact factor: 4.379