Literature DB >> 33586502

Cocaine-specific speed-accuracy trade-off during anti-saccade testing differentiates patients with cocaine use disorder who achieve initial abstinence during treatment.

Constanza de Dios1, Robert Suchting1, Heather E Webber1, Jin H Yoon1, Luba Yammine1, Jessica Vincent1, Michael F Weaver1, Angela L Stotts2, Joy M Schmitz1, Scott D Lane1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The response time speed-accuracy trade-off (SATO) is an established index of information processing ability, but rarely examined as a variable in association with treatment of substance use disorder (SUD). AIM: The purpose of this study was to test baseline information-processing ability differences between individuals who respond to treatment for cocaine use disorder v. those who do not.
METHODS: Eighty patients enrolled in a clinical trial for cocaine use disorder completed a baseline drug-specific eye-tracking (anti-saccade) assessment prior to treatment, which included trials with both cocaine-related and neutral stimuli. SATO functions were computed for treatment responders v. non-responders.
RESULTS: Unexpectedly, responders demonstrated statistically different SATO functions, showing poorer accuracy when executing faster response times. This difference was present on trials that presented cocaine stimuli only.
CONCLUSIONS: SATO during performance of an eye-movement task may be useful for predicting differential response to substance use disorder treatment. However, in the present study, results were specific to cocaine cues rather than an overall SATO performance decrement.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cocaine use disorder; anti-saccade; eye tracking; speed-accuracy trade-off; substance use treatment

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33586502      PMCID: PMC8480541          DOI: 10.1177/0269881121991566

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychopharmacol        ISSN: 0269-8811            Impact factor:   4.153


  19 in total

Review 1.  Cognitive enhancement as a treatment for drug addictions.

Authors:  Mehmet Sofuoglu; Elise E DeVito; Andrew J Waters; Kathleen M Carroll
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 5.250

Review 2.  The clinical relevance of attentional bias in substance use disorders.

Authors:  Matt Field; Reshmi Marhe; Ingmar H A Franken
Journal:  CNS Spectr       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 3.790

Review 3.  Cognitive dysfunction in individuals with cocaine use disorder: Potential moderating factors and pharmacological treatments.

Authors:  James J Mahoney
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 3.157

4.  Cognitive deficits predict low treatment retention in cocaine dependent patients.

Authors:  Efrat Aharonovich; Deborah S Hasin; Adam C Brooks; Xinhua Liu; Adam Bisaga; Edward V Nunes
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2005-09-19       Impact factor: 4.492

Review 5.  Recovering from cocaine: insights from clinical and preclinical investigations.

Authors:  Colleen A Hanlon; Thomas J R Beveridge; Linda J Porrino
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2013-04-27       Impact factor: 8.989

6.  Anti-saccade error rates as a measure of attentional bias in cocaine dependent subjects.

Authors:  Nadeeka R Dias; Joy M Schmitz; Nuvan Rathnayaka; Stuart D Red; Anne B Sereno; F Gerard Moeller; Scott D Lane
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  The effect of N-acetylcysteine and working memory training on cocaine use, craving and inhibition in regular cocaine users: correspondence of lab assessments and Ecological Momentary Assessment.

Authors:  Mieke H J Schulte; Reinout W Wiers; Wouter J Boendermaker; Anna E Goudriaan; Wim van den Brink; Denise S van Deursen; Malte Friese; Emily Brede; Andrew J Waters
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 3.913

Review 8.  Cognition and addiction
.

Authors:  Antonio Verdejo-Garcia; Gloria Garcia-Fernandez; Geert Dom
Journal:  Dialogues Clin Neurosci       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 5.986

9.  PSYCHOLOGY. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science.

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 10.  The speed-accuracy tradeoff: history, physiology, methodology, and behavior.

Authors:  Richard P Heitz
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.