Manoj Kushwaha1,2, Arem Qayum3,4, Shreyans K Jain5, Jasvinder Singh3,4, Amit Kumar Srivastava6, Shubham Srivastava7, Nisha Sharma1,4, Vidushi Abrol1, Ruchi Malik7, Shashank K Singh3, Ram A Vishwakarma8, Sundeep Jaglan1,4. 1. Microbial Biotechnology Division, Indian Institute of Integrative Medicine (CSIR), Canal Road, Jammu 180001, India. 2. Department of Biotechnology, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar 143001, Punjab, India. 3. Cancer Pharmacology Division, Indian Institute of Integrative Medicine (CSIR), Canal Road, Jammu 180001, India. 4. Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), Ghaziabad 201002, India. 5. Department of Pharmaceutical Engineering and Technology, Indian Institute of Technology (Banaras Hindu University), Varanasi 221005, Uttar Pradesh, India. 6. Department of Biotechnology, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee 247667, Uttarakhand, India. 7. Department of Pharmacy, Central University of Rajasthan, Bandarsindri, Kishangarh, Ajmer 305801, Rajasthan, India. 8. Medicinal Chemistry Division, Indian Institute of Integrative Medicine (CSIR), Canal Road, Jammu 180001, India.
Abstract
Seven cytochalasins, 19,20-epoxycytochalasin N, cytochalasin P1, deacetyl 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C, 19,20-epoxycytochalasin D, 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C, cytochalasin D, and cytochalasin C, were isolated from a fungal (Rosellinia sanctae-cruciana) crude extract. A cytotoxicity assay (sulforhodamine B) was performed on a series of cancer cell lines: HT-29, A-549, PC-3, HCT-116, SW-620, and MCF-7. Simultaneously, the liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS)/MS profile of 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C-treated cell lines revealed that 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C (m/z 524.25) oxidized to a metabolite of m/z 522.25 Da (-2 Da (-2H) from 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C). Further chemical oxidation of 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C using the Dess-Martin reagent produced an identical metabolite. It has been noticed that the parent molecule (19,20-epoxycytochalasin C) showed an IC50 of 650 nM (on HT-29), whereas for the oxidized metabolite (m/z 522.24) of 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C, the IC50 was >10 μM. It is clear that the parent molecule had 16 times higher cytotoxic potential as compared to the oxidized metabolite. The spectroscopic investigation indicated that the oxidation of the hydroxyl (-OH) group occurred at the C7 position in 19,20-epoxycyctochalsin C and led to the inactivation of 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C. Further, cell cycle analysis and histopathological evidence support the findings, and CDK2 could be a possible target of 19,20-epoxycyctochalasin C.
Seven cytochalasins, 19,20-epoxycytochalasin N, cytochalasin P1, deacetyl 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C, 19,20-epoxycytochalasin D, 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C, cytochalasin D, and cytochalasin C, were isolated from a fungal (Rosellinia sanctae-cruciana) crude extract. A cytotoxicity assay (sulforhodamine B) was performed on a series of cancer cell lines: HT-29, A-549, PC-3, HCT-116, SW-620, and MCF-7. Simultaneously, the liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS)/MS profile of 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C-treated cell lines revealed that 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C (m/z 524.25) oxidized to a metabolite of m/z 522.25 Da (-2 Da (-2H) from 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C). Further chemical oxidation of 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C using the Dess-Martin reagent produced an identical metabolite. It has been noticed that the parent molecule (19,20-epoxycytochalasin C) showed an IC50 of 650 nM (on HT-29), whereas for the oxidized metabolite (m/z 522.24) of 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C, the IC50 was >10 μM. It is clear that the parent molecule had 16 times higher cytotoxic potential as compared to the oxidized metabolite. The spectroscopic investigation indicated that the oxidation of the hydroxyl (-OH) group occurred at the C7 position in 19,20-epoxycyctochalsin C and led to the inactivation of 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C. Further, cell cycle analysis and histopathological evidence support the findings, and CDK2 could be a possible target of 19,20-epoxycyctochalasin C.
Cytochalasins are a
structurally diverse group of fungal secondary
metabolites. Since the first discovery in 1967, hundreds of different
cytochalasins have been reported with a broad range of biological
activity. The actin cytoskeleton is the most common and widely studied
target of these metabolites; interaction to actin affects various
cellular processes such as cell adhesion, motility, signaling, and
cytokinesis.[1,2] This macrocycle can vary tremendously
between cytochalasins as carbocycles, lactones, or even cyclic.[3] Cytochalasins encapsulate a tremendous diversity
of mycogenic toxins that are unique in both structures and targets.
As a result, the mechanisms by which these pharmacological agents
damage malignant cells are immense. Consequently, there are a substantial
variety of mycogenic agents to examine for efficacy in chemotherapy.[4] However, to date, cytochalasins have typically
been thought of as crucial experimental agents for probing mechanisms
of the cytoskeleton and delineated as valid chemotherapeutic agents.
In fact, a clinically approved microfilament-directed agent yet has
to be approved for use in cancer therapy with substantial evidence,
suggesting that cytochalasins may be vital anticancer agents.[5] Although cytochalasins are reported frequently
for their anti-inflammatory,[6] apoptosis-inducing,
antiangiogenesis, nematicidal, and antifungal[6] activities against bacteria,[7] these compounds
seem too cytotoxic for use in clinical trials. Present studies conducted
by computer-assisted phase-contrast microscopy revealed that cytotoxicity
and cytostatic behaviors of cytochalasins are two different mechanisms
(actin depolymerization and nuclear fragmentation).[8,9] Due
to the wide diversity of mechanisms by which cytochalasins damage
malignant cells while considering selectivity against normal cells.[10,11] As microfilament-directed agents proved to be valuable in clinical
cancer management. However, the efficacy of this broad molecular family
has been shown predominantly by only two specific structures (cytochalasins
B and D),[10,11] and more research is required to deduce
whether other cytochalasins have the clinical potential for cancer
research. Furthermore, extensive in vivo studies
need to be considered to accurately determine the prospective clinical
utility of cytochalasins, as there is less understanding of the relative in vivo host toxicity of the cytochalasins. Therefore, using
cytochalasins to preferentially damage malignant cells through actin
disruption is a novel prospect. It is important to note that cytochalasins
B and D have been the most inspected. Most cytochalasins demonstrate
the capacity to inhibit tumorigenic growth, especially of the HT-29cancer cell line.[12] In the study, we have
analyzed the liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS)/MS
profiling of the cytochalasin-treated cell line and identified an
oxidized metabolite of 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C. Further, we have
synthesized the same metabolite via chemical transformation as affirmed
during cytotoxicity profiling. We have found that the metabolite was
inactive in comparison to the parent molecule via cell cycle analysis.
Moreover, this was achieved by the LC–MS/MS study of cancer
cell lines with high accuracy. Tandem MS of different cytochalasins
is very useful for metabolic identification of cytochalasins in crude
extracts. The complete structure elucidation of metabolites (oxidized
19,20-epoxycytochalasin C) provides valuable information to medicinal
chemists about target structure modification and structure–activity
relationship, during the drug development process. The ability to
identify drug metabolism at a small scale is useful to further perform
the bioassay and study the toxicity of potential drug candidates.
Experimental
Section
Chemicals and Reagents
Potato dextrose agar (PDA) and
potato dextrose broth (PDB) were purchased from Himedia, India. LC–MS-grade
methanol, acetonitrile, sulphorhodamine B dye (SRB), and formic acid
were acquired from Sigma-Aldrich, and water (MS-grade) was from Merck.
19,20-Epoxycytochalasin C was isolated from fungal culture (Figure S1) and dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide
(DMSO, Sigma-Aldrich) to get a 10 mM stock solution. Fetal bovine
serum (FBS), penicillin, streptomycin, trypsin, and phosphate-buffered
saline (PBS) were obtained from Gibco, and propidium iodide (PI) was
purchased from Calbiochem.
Fungal Strain, Culture Conditions, and Semipreparative
Isolation
of Cytochalasins
The fungal strain was subcultured on PDA
media in Petri plates maintained at 28 °C for 7 days. The agar
plugs were used to inoculate 500 mL Erlenmeyer flasks, each containing
200 mL of autoclaved PDB; the flask cultures were incubated at 28
°C for 3 days in a shaking incubator at 150 rpm in the dark to
obtain the seed culture. Seed culture (10%) was used to inoculate
40 Erlenmeyer flasks of 1000 mL, each containing ≈400 mL of
potato dextrose broth medium and incubated under the same condition
as seed culture for 10 days. Total seven cytochalasins, comparing
the spectroscopic data of all isolates with those reported in the
literature, were isolated by semipreparative high-pressure liquid
chromatography (HPLC) and characterized by NMR and mass spectroscopy
(Figures S1–S9).[1,2,13−17]
Sample Preparation for Dereplication Analysis
Fermentation
was terminated by adding 10% methanol in the broth followed by homogenization
and centrifugation to separate the cell debris. The supernatant was
extracted with an equal volume of ethyl acetate three times. The organic
extract was concentrated under vacuum using a rotary evaporator to
yield 90 mg of brown oil extract (Figure S1).
LC–MS and Tandem MS Analyses
LC separation was
achieved by an Agilent 1290 HPLC infinity series, equipped with an
Agilent UHD Q-TOF 6540 mass spectrometer (Agilent Technologies, Santa
Clara, CA) and an Agilent RP18e column (4.6 × 250 mm, 5 μm).
The separation was performed at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min under a
gradient program, in which eluent A was composed of 0.1% formic acid
in water and eluent B was composed of acetonitrile. The gradient system
was applied as follows: 20–50% of B in 0–20 min, 50–70%
of B in 20–25 min, 70–20% of B in 25–26 min,
and hold for 3 min; the total run time was 30 min. The electrospray
ionization (ESI)–LC–HRMS data acquired by the Agilent
UHD Q-TOF 6540 was in the positive mode. MS acquiring parameters are
as follows: capillary voltage, 3 kV in the positive mode with a gas
temperature of 300 °C; drying gas, 12 L/min; and nebulizer pressure,
35 psi. The scan source parameters skimmer, fragmentor, and octapole
RF peak were 65, 175, and 700 V, respectively. The data acquired with
a mass scan range were 100–2000 m/z in ESI positive mode. MS/MS acquisition of molecular ion
peaks was performed with the same parameter using a fixed collision
energy of 30 eV in the positive mode for target compounds (Figure S2). The cell lines A-549 (lung), PC-3
(prostate), HCT-116 (colon), HT-29 (colon), SW-620 (colon), and MCF-7
(breast) were used for the metabolite profiling of cytochalasins.
Chemical Transformation of 19,20-Epoxycytochalasin C
A solution
of Dess–Martin periodinane was prepared in dichloromethane
(1 mg/mL), and 100 μL of Dess–Martin periodinane solution
was added to a 1 mL solution of 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C (10 mg/mL
in dichloromethane), mixed well, and held for 24 h. The reaction was
terminated by the addition of 1 mL of methanol solution; this reaction
mixture was further used for semipreparative HPLC analysis (Figure S10).
Cell Lines and Growth Conditions
The humancancer cell
lines representing lung (A-549), prostate (PC-3), colon (HCT-116,
HT-29, and SW-620), and breast (MCF-7) were procured from NCI-60:
National Cancer Institute. The cell lines of the cancer-screening
panel were sustained in RPMI-1640 medium containing 10% fetal calf
serum (FCS), penicillin (100 units/mL), and streptomycin (100 μg/mL).
The cell cultures were grown in a CO2 incubator (New Brunswick,
Galaxy 170 R, Eppendorf) at 37 °C under 98% humidity, 95% air,
100% relative humidity, and a 5% CO2 environment.
Sulphorhodamine
B (SRB) Assay
The cell suspension (100
μL) was seeded in 96-well flat-bottom plates (NUNC), with the
density ranging from 7000 to 12 000 cells/well depending on
the doubling time of particular cell lines. The plates were incubated
(37 °C, 5% CO2, 95% air, and 100% relative humidity)
for 24 h. After 24 h, the cells were exposed to different concentrations
of cytochalasins along with Paclitaxel and 5-FU as a positive control
for 48 h under the same condition. After 48 h, cells were fixed in situ with cold TCA for 60 min at 4 °C. Then, plates
were rinsed three times with water and air-dried. The SRB solution
(0.4% of SRB in 1% acetic acid) was added to each well and incubated
for 30 min at room temperature. After staining, the plates were washed
(three times) with 1% acetic acid and air-dried. A 10 mM Tris base
buffer solution was used for solubilizing the protein-bound dye. The
absorbance was read at a wavelength of 540 nm on a microplate reader
(Thermo Scientific). Growth inhibition (GIC50) was established
by plotting OD against concentration using GraphPad Prism, version
5.
Phase-Contrast Microscopy
Humancolon cancer cells
(HT-29) were seeded in six-well plates at a density of 1 × 105 cells/mL and then cultured for 24 h. Eventually, the cells
were subjected to treatment with varying concentrations of 19,20-epoxycytochalasinC for 48 h. Preceding drug treatment, culture plates were analyzed
using an inverted light microscope (Nikon Corp., Tokyo, Japan) and
images were taken (Figure S23).
Scanning
Electron Microscopy (SEM)
HT-29 cells were
exposed to 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C and fixed for 1 h with glutaraldehyde
solution (2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) at
room temperature) and then incubated at 4 °C overnight. Subsequently,
the glutaraldehyde solution was extracted and the cells were washed
with PBS. After complete dehydration via a gradient ethanol series,
samples were suspended in 100% ethanol. The suspended sample was placed
onto a Nanopercolator (JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and dried up. The
dried sample was coated with a platinum layer using an MSP-1S sputter
coater (Shinku Device, Ibaraki, Japan) and investigated as well as
photographed using a Phenom ProX desktop scanning electron microscope
(Phenom-World BV, Eindhoven, The Netherlands).
Molecular
Docking Analysis
Molecular docking of CDK2
with the identified molecules was carried out to investigate possible
interactions and underlying binding efficiency. All docking procedures
were performed using induced-fit docking procedures implemented in
Maestro v10.3. The protein and its coordinates were procured from
the Protein Data Bank (PDB ID: 4KD1). The bound ligand, i.e., Dinaciclib,
to the crystal structure was used as the centroid for all docking
calculations. Initially, the raw protein structure was prepared using
the standard protocol provided by Schrodinger LLC, which consisted
of three steps: preprocessing, optimization, and minimization. Before
utilizing the prepared crystal structure for docking and simulation
purposes, retrospective validation was performed by docking Dinaciclib
to the binding site and superimposing two ligands. Further, ligands
were sketched and prepared using Ligprep and all docking procedures
were carried out using an extra precision (XP) model (Table S3 and Figure S24).
Molecular
Dynamics Simulation
A 100 ns molecular dynamics
simulation was performed for each complex, i.e., CDK2 with Dinaciclib
and CDK2 with 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C. All simulations were carried
out using Desmond, provided by the D.E. Shaw research group. The hierarchical
steps suggested by the developers were used for simulations, which
consisted of three steps: (i) system building, (ii) minimization,
and (iii) molecular dynamics simulations. For setting up the initial
system, the SPC (simple point charge) solvent water model was used
with appropriate counterions. After system setup, minimization steps
comprising hybrid utility of the steepest descent method and the LBGFS
algorithm were carried out. Subsequently, individual simulations were
carried out using the NVT ensemble at 300 K temperature and 1 bar
pressure (Figure S24).
CDK2/Cyclin
A2 Kinase Assay
The CDK2 kinase activity
of 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C was estimated by the ADP-Glo kinase assay
(Promega Corporation). It produces luminescent signals, corresponding
to the adenosine triphosphate (ADP) concentration triggered by the
kinase reaction. Dose–response curves were assessed in triplicate
using various dilutions of the compound. The assay was executed in
white 96-well plates taking both the reaction mixture (kinase reaction
in the presence of a substrate) and blank control (kinase reaction
in the absence of the substrate) for examination. 19,20-EpoxycytochalasinC (5 μL of each dilution), tyrosine kinase buffer-diluted enzyme
(10 μL), and substrate-ATP (10 μL) were moved to a white
96-well microtiter plate (Costar # 3912, Corning, NY) and incubated
for 60 min at ambient temperature. CDK2 kinase (25 ng), ATP (500 μM),
and histone H1 (0.2 μg/μL) substrates were added to each
well. In the blank, all components were present except the enzyme.
To diminish the residual ATP, ADP-Glo reagent (25 μL) was added,
the plate was once again kept for 40 min at ambient temperature, and
50 μL of kinase detection reagent was added to each well. The
ADP produced (nM) in the presence and absence of the substrate was
detected after 30 min through luminescent signals by a BioTek Synergy
Mx microplate reader. The percent (%) enzyme inhibition was evaluated
by subtracting the luminescent values obtained from the blank from
all other reaction values. Then, each reaction luminescent value was
divided by the 0 μM inhibitor reaction and multiplied 100 times
to calculate the % enzyme activity.To calculate the IC50, Prism, version 5.0, from GraphPad Software (La Jolla, CA),
was used.
Cell Cycle Analysis
After incubation with 19,20-epoxycytochalasinC at indicated concentrations of 162.5, 325, 650, and 1300 nM for
48 h, HT-29humancolon cancer cells (1 × 105cells/2
mL/well) were collected, washed two times with PBS, and fixed overnight
with 70% cold ethanol. After 24 h, cells were again washed with PBS,
put through RNase digestion (0.1 mg/mL) at 37 °C for 90 min (Sigma-Aldrich,
St. Louis, MO), and finally probed with propidium iodide (10 mg/mL).
Cells were instantaneously analyzed on a FACS Calibur flow cytometer
(Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ). The results were processed
by Mod fit (Verity Software House Inc., Topsham).
In Vivo
To evaluate the in vivo efficacy
of 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C, a carcinogen-induced colon cancer model
was developed. The experiment was performed according to the institutional
animal ethics committee guidelines with prior approval (no. IAEC 72/127/2/18).
Briefly, female BALB/c (4–6 weeks) weighing 20–22 g
were taken randomly. Azoxymethane (1 mg/mL) was given intraperitoneally
(ip), and after that, 3% dextran sodium sulfate (DSS) was given in
drinking water (three times after a gap of 16 days). Animals were
euthanized at several stages to monitor the tumor progression (Figure S27). After tumor development, the animals
were treated with 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C for 30 days and tissue
samples were analyzed for histopathological studies (Figure ).
Figure 5
Cross examination
of the sections of the colon of BALB/c mice exposed
to AOM and stained with H&E. The control group received 0.9% normal
saline, the positive control received 5-Fluorouracil (20 mg/kg, ip),
and the test group received 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C (1 mg/kg, ip).
Statistical Analysis
The results indicted values from
three independent experiments with the data expressed as means ±
standard deviation (SD). The control and treatment groups were evaluated
using the Student’s t-test by GraphPad PRISM
5.0 software. A p-value: non-significant (ns, P > 0.05), *(P ≤ 0.05), **(P ≤ 0.01), ***(P ≤ 0.001),
****(P ≤ 0.0001), was considered statistically
significant.
Results and Discussion
The fungus Rosellinia sanctae-cruciana (MRCJ-173)
used in this study was obtained from Col. Sir R.N. Chopra Microbial
Resource Centre at CSIR-IIIM, Jammu, India. The fungal endophyteRosellinia sanctae-cruciana was subjected for identification
and isolation of various cytochalsins.[13] The crude extract thus obtained was reconstituted in methanol, and
a suitable HPLC method was developed for recording MS and UV (PDA)
spectra (Figure S1). We applied the LC–MS/MS-based
dereplication strategy for the identification of the chemical compounds
from the crude extract. The LC–MS study showed major ionized
compounds showing the mass range 500–600 Da, especially m/z 508.26 and m/z 524.26 occurring frequently between tR 20 and 35 min. We performed the online database search
(DNP). For further confirmation of cytochalasins, we generate the
formula of given peaks according to DNP; the mass accuracy was between
−7 and +0.3 ppm (Figures S2–S10). So, it is clear that the crude contains the cytochalasins well
known for their pronounced activity on a diverse panel of cancer cell
lines. Subsequently, the LC-PDA-MS data support the HPLC-guided isolation
of cytochalasins from the crude extract, and we successfully isolated
seven cytochalasins (19,20-epoxycytochalasin N, 19,20-epoxycytochalasinC, cytochalasin C, cytochalasin D, 19,20-epoxycytochalasin D, deacetyl
19,20-epoxycytochalasin C, and cytochalasin P1) from the crude extract
and completely characterized by NMR (Figures S1–S9). During tandem MS profiling, the peaks at m/z 91 [M + H]+ (tropylium ion species [C7H7] + of the benzyl unit), m/z 120 (C8H10N+) of the phenylalanine moiety, and m/z 105 (C8H9) were observed as the most common
ions, which also confirm the presence of phenylalanine amino acid
of cytochalasin (Figure S2).
In
Vitro Effect of Cytochalasins on a Diverse
Group of Human Cancer Cell Lines
We determined the effect
of various analogues of 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C on cancer cell proliferation
by performing the SRB assay in different humancancer cell lines (A-549,
PC-3, HCT-116, HT-29, SW-620, and MCF-7). The effect of 19,20-epoxycytochalasinC was determined for a panel of humancancer cell lines, in which
cells were treated with specified concentrations of 19,20-epoxycytochalasinC (0.25, 0.5, 1, 2.5, 5, 7.5, and 10 μM) for 48 h. As shown
in Table , cell proliferation
in HT-29 cells was markedly reduced by 50–80% with 19,20-epoxycytochalasinC treatment as compared to control. Furthermore, significant dose-dependent
decreases in cell proliferation of A-549, HCT-116, MCF-7, and SW-620
were observed, whereas in normal breast epithelial cells, FR-2, no
detrimental decrease in cell viability was observed and proved to
be more selective (Table S4). This inferred
the special efficacy of 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C for targeted therapy
for colon cancer. From all of the seven cytochalasins, 19,20-epoxycytochalasinC showed the most efficacious activity on all of the cancer cell lines.
Further investigation of 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C was done through
LC–MS profiling (Tables and S4).
Table 1
Cytotoxicity
Profiling of Isolated
Cytochalasinsa
Note: FR-2 (normal
breast epithelial
cells); A-549 (lung cancer cells); SW-620, HT-29, and HCT-116 (colon
cancer cells); and PC-3 (prostate cancer cells).
Note: FR-2 (normal
breast epithelial
cells); A-549 (lung cancer cells); SW-620, HT-29, and HCT-116 (colon
cancer cells); and PC-3 (prostate cancer cells).
Visual Inspection of TIC (Treated with 19,20-Epoxycytochalasins)
We performed LC–MS/MS analysis profiling of the crude extract
obtained from cell lines treated with 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C. In
the visual inspection of the total ion chromatogram (TIC), we observed
that the peak at m/z 522.2 [M +
H]+ appeared at tR = 20.5 (≈1%
of the area of m/z 524.25) during
LC–MS/MS profiling of six cancer cell line extracts. One new
metabolite was speculated to be oxidized 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C
with a molecular formula of C30H35NO7, observed 522.2486 [M + H]+ calculated 522.2486 [M +
H]+, which is 2 Da less than the parent ion (Figures , S20, and S21).
Figure 1
LC–ESI–MS/MS profiles and tandem MS spectra
of different
cell line extracts: (a) HT-29, (b) SW-620, and (c) PC-3 peak at m/z 524 eluted at tR = 18.8 min, corresponding to 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C; peak
at m/z 522 eluted at tR = 18.8 min, corresponding to oxidized 19,20-epoxycytochalasin
C. The tandem MS spectra of m/z 522
give a common daughter ion at m/z 91.0 and 120.08 as 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C. The common daughter
ion and the loss of 2H confirm the oxidation in 19,20-epoxycytochalasin
C (Figure S2).
LC–ESI–MS/MS profiles and tandem MS spectra
of different
cell line extracts: (a) HT-29, (b) SW-620, and (c) PC-3 peak at m/z 524 eluted at tR = 18.8 min, corresponding to 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C; peak
at m/z 522 eluted at tR = 18.8 min, corresponding to oxidized 19,20-epoxycytochalasinC. The tandem MS spectra of m/z 522
give a common daughter ion at m/z 91.0 and 120.08 as 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C. The common daughter
ion and the loss of 2H confirm the oxidation in 19,20-epoxycytochalasinC (Figure S2).For further confirmation of structural similarity in the parent
and oxidized molecules, we have oxidized 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C
with the Dess–Martin reagent and purified by a C18 HPLC column
using a water–acetonitrile gradient (Figure S10). HRESIMS of Dess–Martin-oxidized 19,20-epoxycytochalasinC gave a molecular formula for m/z 522.29, C30H35NO7 (Figures , S20, and S21). The 1H NMR spectrum of oxidized 19,20-epoxycytochalasin
suggested proton signal similarities to the known 19,20-epoxycytochalasinC (Figure S11). Interpretation of 1H, 13C, HSQC, and HMBC NMR data (Figures S11–S19 and Table S1) indicated the presence
of four carboxylic acid groups (δC 170.06, 173.89, 198.98, 215.05
ppm). The peak at δC 198.98 suggests the oxidation at C7. The
full structure was assigned by the interpretation of 1D and 2D NMR
data, in particular, COSY (Figure S19)
and HMBC correlations (Figures S11–S19), The HMBC correlations from H12 (δH = 1.5 ppm, 3H) and H8
(δH = 3.2 ppm, 1H) to C7 (δC = 198.98) suggest the hydroxyl
group converts into the keto group at the C7 position (Figures S11–S19 and Table S1). The confirmation
of retention time-based analysis confirmed that the cell-based metabolites
and chemically oxidized metabolites are structurally similar (Figure ).
Figure 2
LC–MS chromatograms
and mass spectra: (a) +ESI-base peak
chromatogram of the standard mixture, (b) +EIC of m/z 524.25, 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C of the standard
mixture, (c) +EIC of m/z 522.25,
oxidized 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C of the standard mixture, (d) +ESI-base
peak chromatogram (A-549 cell line), (e) +EIC of m/z 524.25, 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C (A-549 cell
line), and (f) +EIC of m/z 522.25
oxidized 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C (A-549 cell line). Note: The chemically
oxidized 19,20-eopxycytochalasin C eluted at tR = 14.7 min and in the chromatogram of A-549 the peak at m/z 522.25 oxidized 19,20-epoxycytochalasin
C also eluted at tR = 14.7 min, the chromatographic
separation and the common daughter ion is a confirmation of structural
similarity (Figure S2). The chemical structure
of 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C and oxidized 19,20-epoxycytochalasin
C elucidated by NMR (Figures S11–S19).
LC–MS chromatograms
and mass spectra: (a) +ESI-base peak
chromatogram of the standard mixture, (b) +EIC of m/z 524.25, 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C of the standard
mixture, (c) +EIC of m/z 522.25,
oxidized 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C of the standard mixture, (d) +ESI-base
peak chromatogram (A-549 cell line), (e) +EIC of m/z 524.25, 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C (A-549 cell
line), and (f) +EIC of m/z 522.25
oxidized 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C (A-549 cell line). Note: The chemically
oxidized 19,20-eopxycytochalasin C eluted at tR = 14.7 min and in the chromatogram of A-549 the peak at m/z 522.25 oxidized 19,20-epoxycytochalasinC also eluted at tR = 14.7 min, the chromatographic
separation and the common daughter ion is a confirmation of structural
similarity (Figure S2). The chemical structure
of 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C and oxidized 19,20-epoxycytochalasinC elucidated by NMR (Figures S11–S19).
Biological Activity
Different cytochalasin congeners
altered actin filaments and therefore were reported to affect several
other biological activities inclusive of cell motility, adherence,
secretion, drug efflux, deformability, and morphology.[4,11,13,18]
Activity of Dess–Martin-Oxidized 19,20-Epoxycytochalasin
C
The oxidized compound was further tested on different panels
of cancer cell lines and found to be inactive in comparison to the
parent molecule; it is previously reported the OH group at the C7
position and epoxy groups at 19 and 20 positions were very essential
for the activity of cytochalasins. In the oxidized compound, the −OH
group of the C7 position converted into the keto group by the process
of oxidation and this is the main cause of inactivity.[19]
19,20-Epoxycytochalasin C Alters Phenotypic
Characteristics
of HT-29 Colon Cancer Cells
We assessed the effect of 19,20-epoxycytochalasinC in HT-29 (colorectal cancer cell) morphology and its cytoskeleton
organization. As depicted in Figure , for HT-29, untreated control has uniformly dispersed
cell colonies with altogether epithelial cell morphology and adjacent
cell-to-cell adherence. On the contrary, cells with 19,20-epoxycytochalasinC led to rounding of the cells with prominent fimbriae structures,
and degeneracy of the epithelial cell aggregates with clear remnants
of adhesion molecules was seen. Furthermore, the remnants of adhesive
contacts and many disengaged cells were observed.
19,20-Epoxycytochalasin
C Induces Cell Cycle Arrest and Caspase-3/7-Mediated
Apoptosis in HT-29 Colon Cancer Cells
19,20-EpoxycytochalasinC induced a dose-dependent S cell cycle phase arrest after 48 h of
exposure in HT-29 cells. Thus, to inquire whether phase arrest akin
to the caspase-3/7-controlled pathway ultimately led to apoptosis,
cells (HT-29) were preincubated with 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C and
pan caspase inhibitor (Z-Vad-FMK). We found that 19,20-epoxycytochalasinC brings about the activation and cleavage of caspase-3 through membrane
translocation of phosphatidyl-serine as compared to the pan caspase
inhibitor (Figure S22). On the contrary,
the pan caspase inhibitor did not prevent 19,20-epoxycytochalasinC-induced S phase cell cycle arrest. These results specify that 19,20-epoxycytochalasinC affects the signaling pathways in HT-29 cells, notably to cell cycle
arrest and apoptosis (Figure S28).
SEM Analysis
of Spheres from HT-29 Cells
Morphological
changes to cells following exposure to 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C (650
nM) treatment for 48 h were visualized under high-magnification SEM
and showed that HT-29 cells exhibited an elliptical to clublike appearance.
In 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C-treated HT-29 cells, the surface was
smooth, irregular, and fused with intrusion periphery featuring apoptotic
blebs with shrinkage as compared to microvilli containing rough surface
in control HT-29 cells (Figure ).
Figure 3
Imaging of platinum-coated HT-29 cells: (A) control HT-29 cells,
(B) HT-29 cells treated with 50 nM paclitaxel, (C) HT-29 cells treated
with 650 nM of 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C, (D) HT-29 cells treated
with 1.3 μM 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C, and (E) HT-29 cells treated
with 3 μM 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C. (HT-29 cells were fixed
for 1 h with 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4)
at RT and then incubated at 4 °C overnight). Subsequently, the
glutaraldehyde solution was extracted and the cells were washed with
PBS. After complete dehydration via a gradient ethanol series, samples
were suspended in 100% ethanol, placed onto a Nanopercolator (JEOL
Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), dried up, then coated with a platinum layer using
an MSP-1S sputter coater (Shinku Device, Ibaraki, Japan), and investigated
as well as photographed using a Phenom ProX desktop scanning electron
microscope (Phenom-World BV, Eindhoven, The Netherlands).
Imaging of platinum-coated HT-29 cells: (A) control HT-29 cells,
(B) HT-29 cells treated with 50 nM paclitaxel, (C) HT-29 cells treated
with 650 nM of 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C, (D) HT-29 cells treated
with 1.3 μM 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C, and (E) HT-29 cells treated
with 3 μM 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C. (HT-29 cells were fixed
for 1 h with 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4)
at RT and then incubated at 4 °C overnight). Subsequently, the
glutaraldehyde solution was extracted and the cells were washed with
PBS. After complete dehydration via a gradient ethanol series, samples
were suspended in 100% ethanol, placed onto a Nanopercolator (JEOL
Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), dried up, then coated with a platinum layer using
an MSP-1S sputter coater (Shinku Device, Ibaraki, Japan), and investigated
as well as photographed using a Phenom ProX desktop scanning electron
microscope (Phenom-World BV, Eindhoven, The Netherlands).
In Silico
Molecular dynamics simulations were executed
for a timescale of 100 ns for either of the complexes. Simulation
quality analysis for both the complexes exhibited stable ensemble
characteristics, i.e., pressure, temperature, volume, and potential
energy. Root-mean-square deviations (RMSD) analysis of the Cα
atoms of the backbone was accomplished for both the complexes with
regard to the initial frame to indicate the stability of protein–ligand
complexes bound in the kinase domain. Stable trajectories were discovered
for both the complexes, i.e., Dinaciclib and 19,20-epoxycytochalasinC, and it converged at 2.0 and 3.5 Å, as revealed in Table S3 and Figure S24, respectively. Root-mean-square
fluctuation (RMSF) analysis for side chains of the complexes displayed
fluctuations of higher intensity for periphery atoms (Table S3 and Figure S24). The ligand-binding
domain evidenced lesser fluctuations, asserting the coherent classification
of ligands in the dynamic state.The residue interaction pattern
was explored to elucidate the role, nature, and extent in constructing
ligand-binding energetics. The occupancy map of various interacting
residues is represented in Figure S24.
Previous reports on the CDK2-binding cavity suggests that it consists
of the following hydrophobic residues, i.e., Ile 10, Val18, Ala31,
Val64, Phe80, Phe82, Leu83, Leu134, and Ala144; polar residues Thr14,
His84, Gln85, and Gln131; negatively charged Glu51, Glu81, Asp86,
and Asp145; positively charged Lys33, Lys89, Gly11, and Gly13. As
for the Dinaciclib–CDK2 complex, Leu83 and Lys33 formed crucial
hydrogen bonding for stability. For the 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C–CDK2
complex, the stability was achieved through positively charged residues
and polar residues in the binding cavity, i.e., Gly13 and Thr14. Ionic
interactions with Lys129 and Arg150 for 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C
show a distinguishing feature, which was not observed in the Dinaciclib
complex. Furthermore, interaction pattern analysis suggests that while
Dinaciclib complex interaction is driven by hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic
contacts, interactions and stability of investigatory molecule 19,20-epoxycytochalasinC are directed by hydrogen bonding, ionic interaction, and water-mediated
hydrogen bonding. Hydrophobic interactivity was not observed in 19,20-epoxycytochalasinC (Figure S24 and Table S2).
In
Vitro CDK2 Kinase Activity
Various
cytochalasin analogues were then screened for in vitro CDK2 kinase
activity. 19,20-Epoxycytochalasin C had promising activity against
CDK2 and showed 39, 66, and 88% inhibition at various specified concentrations.
In contrast, other analogues that were screened at a concentration
of 1 μM had shown less selectivity for the CDK2 kinase domain,
displaying a nonselective interaction. Ensuing dose–response
analysis for 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C on CDK2 gave an IC50 of ≈0.9 μM, which resulted in an apparent 690-fold
selectivity for 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C over CDK2 in vitro. At higher
concentrations, 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C treatment resulted in no
significant shift in the activity of CDK2 due to the extent of saturation
of the inhibitor at higher concentrations or maybe due to a fast precipitation
rate during the assay time period. Altogether, these data suggested
that 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C is a selective CDK2 inhibitor with
a promising safety profile (Figure and Table S3).
Figure 4
19,20-Epoxycytochalasin
C dose–responses curve against 25
ng of CDK2/cyclin A2 to determine its inhibitory potency (19,20-epoxycytochalasin
C, IC50 = 866 ± 0.176 nM; Flavopiridol as a positive
control, IC50 = 290 ± 0.035 nM).
19,20-EpoxycytochalasinC dose–responses curve against 25
ng of CDK2/cyclin A2 to determine its inhibitory potency (19,20-epoxycytochalasinC, IC50 = 866 ± 0.176 nM; Flavopiridol as a positive
control, IC50 = 290 ± 0.035 nM).Animals were divided into different groups,
the control group was given 0.9% normal saline, the positive control
received 5-FU (20 mg/kg, ip), and the treated group received 1 mg/kg
ip of 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C alternatively. After 30 days of treatment,
animals were sacrificed by cervical dislocation and the large bowel
was removed, rinsed with PBS, and fixed in 10% formalin for histopathological
analysis. Tissue samples in paraffin wax were cut into 5 μm
thick longitudinal sections using a microtome (Shandon 325 Manual
Microtome, Thermo Fisher). The sections were then stained with hematoxylin
and eosin (H&E) dye for histological examination. Tissue sections
were observed under a light microscope (original magnification 400×).
Histopathological examination of control group samples represented
the classical pathological features of colorectal carcinomas, which
were evident by moderately differentiated and intricate glandular
structures. Sections were also characterized by interspersed necrotic
debris within the luminal regions. Treated animals revealed a remarkable
therapeutic outcome in terms of the reduced glandular formation along
with well-formed cellular integrity. The overall bodyweight of the
animals reduced gradually, and the survival rate of the animals also
increased (Figures and S27).Cross examination
of the sections of the colon of BALB/cmice exposed
to AOM and stained with H&E. The control group received 0.9% normal
saline, the positive control received 5-Fluorouracil (20 mg/kg, ip),
and the test group received 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C (1 mg/kg, ip).
Quantification of 19,20-Epoxycytochalasin
C in the Liver
A selective and sensitive liquid chromatography
with mass spectrometry
method was developed and validated for accurate determination of 19,20-epoxycytochalasinC in BALB/cmice liver. A liver homogenate was prepared in 10 mL of
methanol and extracted thrice with 10 mL of methanol; the centrifuged
liver homogenate supernatant was dried under vacuum. The dried sample
was reconstituted in 1 mL of methanol, and 10 μL was used for
MS analysis. The sample was injected into a C18 analytical column
with 15 min of run time at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min. The detection
was performed on an Agilent 1290 HPLC series equipped with a Agilent
6410B Triple Quadrupole mass spectrometer. The selected ion monitoring
of m/z 524.2 [M + H]+ for 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C was used for detection and quantification
purposes. The calibration curves for plasma and tissue samples were
linear over the range of 10–10 000 ng/mL with a lower
limit of quantification of 30 ng/mL. The method was successfully applied
for the quantification study of 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C in the mice
liver. In the liver, a total of 18.50 μg of 19,20-epoxycytochalasinC was recovered (Figures S25 and S26).
Discussion
In this study, the use of high-resolution electrospray
tandem mass
spectrometry allowed the identification of cytochalasin in fungal
crude extracts. By combining the full MS scan mode, target MS/MS scan,
precursor ion scan on LC–MS QqQ, structure search in DNP, and
auto MS/MS data, we apply this strategy to different isolated cytochalasins,
from which seven cytochalasins were successfully characterized by
NMR (Figures S1–S9). Seven pure
cytochalasins were tested on six cancer cell lines, among which the
HT-29 colon cancer cell line showed the most potent activity (Table ). Because of different
activities on all of the treated six cancer cell lines, we assume
that some biotransformation may occur in the molecule. For further
accuracy, we performed LC–MS/MS profiling of the crude obtained
from 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C-treated cell lines. We have found a
peak at m/z 524.24 [M + H] + corresponding to 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C and a peak at m/z 522.24 [M + H]+, which is
2 Da less than the m/z value of
19,20-epoxycytochalasin C. It is confirmed that oxidation occurred
in 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C (Figures , 2, and S16). Subsequently, the oxidized metabolite was chemically
obtained so as to compare and find the structural correlation between
biotransformed metabolite and chemically oxidized compound. During
chromatographic separation, chemically oxidized 19,20-epoxycytochalasinC and cell metabolites eluted at the same retention time, indicating
that both compounds have structural similarity (Figure ). Cytotoxicity profiling and cell cycle
analysis were performed for the 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C-treated
HT-29 cell line, and S phase arrest was found (Figure S28). It was well proved that the alteration in cyclin-dependent
kinase (CDK) activity is mainly associated with cell cycle defects;
the misregulated CDKs were mainly responsible for unscheduled proliferation
as well as chromosomal instability.[20−24] For investigating the role of cytochalsins, we probed
their activity in cancer as well as normal cells. With an emphasis
on phenotypic challenges by relying on the CDK2 kinase assays results
supported our hypothesis and discovered the lead agent, 19,20-epoxycytochalasinC, represented a potent CDK2 inhibitor was assessed by using a combination
of targeted techniques (Tables S3 and S4). On the basis of evaluated in vitro toxicity, 19,20-epoxycytochalasinC on CDK2 facilitated restriction to the S phase by halting CDK2 in
cancer cells. So, 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C interactions with CDK2
demonstrated a novel, nonredundant requirement for CDK2 in the G1/S
checkpoint pathway that remains intact in cancer cells. Cytochalasin
B is already known for CDK1 inhibition.[18] It was well proved that the alteration in cyclin-dependent kinase
(CDK) activity is mainly associated with cell cycle defects; the misregulated
CDKs were mainly responsible for unscheduled proliferation as well
as chromosomal instability.[20−24] Moreover, from conducted in silico molecular modeling
studies, cytotoxicity and cell cycle analysis results encouraged us
to perform the CDK2 kinase assay (Figure , Table S3, and Figure S28). The crystal structure of the kinase domain of the CDK2
complex (PDB ID: 4KD1) with 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C was chosen as the cited structure
of the receptor. To establish the best docking parameters, seven isolated
cytochalasin active compounds that have been cocrystallized with CDK2
were docked back to the active site of CDK2. The calculated values
of binding affinities and root-mean-square deviations (RMSDs) between
the docked active compounds and the crystallized structures in CDK2
are shown in Table S3. By scanning electron
microscopy, we analyzed the effect of 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C at
relatively various doses on tubulin polymerization. The results suggested
that 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C interacted with tubulin so that the
filament elongation and network formation were restricted. Interestingly,
19,20-epoxycytochalasin C appeared to have remarkable in vitro cytotoxicity
against the cell lines selected for metastatic propensity than that
against the normal cell line (Figure ). After this evaluation, the in vitro efficacy of
19,20-epoxycytochalasin C on an azoxymethane-induced colon cancer
model was determined. After tumor development, the animals were treated
with 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C for 30 days and tissue samples were
analyzed for histopathological studies.[19] As we have given clear proof that a specific 19,20-epoxycytochalasinC restrained azoxymethane-instigated colonic preneoplastic injuries
and adenocarcinomas in female BALB/cmice. The inhibitory potential
of 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C in this investigation is similar to that
of a potential colon malignant growth chemopreventive operator, i.e.,
5-FU. Dose determinations of 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C for tumor adequacy
contemplates depend on a 30 day examination. In this investigation,
no significant impact of 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C on the bodyweight
was seen without any adverse side effects as compared to the control
group. The results suggested that the magnitude of the effects is
independent of the cell types used in the screening experiment. The
effective interaction between the molecular and cellular levels strongly
proposed that cytochalasin efficacy was determined by its potentiality
to affect microtubule integration in vitro.Moreover, LC–MS/MS-based
profiling of the cancer cell metabolite
suggests that the loss of 2H in 19,20-epoxycytochalasin leads to its
inactivity. We provide an overview of the state-of-the-art LC–MS/MS
fast experiments for investigating the 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C metabolism
within the cancer cells. We highlight the wide-area LC–MS/MS-based
dereplication strategies for the analysis of drug metabolism.[25] This article will definitely help in the role
of drug metabolism in drug discovery and development. The molecular
mechanism of the action of 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C leads to the
inhibition of CDK2 as the target protein. In addition to our in vitro
work, in vivo data has been obtained to establish
anticancer activity in a preclinical tumor model but the limited availability
of this agent precludes its initial use in large-scale mammalian preclinical
studies. Therefore, the prospective study sought to determine the
tolerated in vivo doses of 19,20-epoxycytochalasinC in mice, which have extensively characterized the in vivo activity of 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C against solid tumors of murine
origin. Noticeably, 19,20-epoxycytochalasin C significantly improved
the lifespan of mice challenged with colon carcinoma and proved to
effective for targeting colon cancer therapeutics.
Authors: Johannes Kirchmair; Andreas H Göller; Dieter Lang; Jens Kunze; Bernard Testa; Ian D Wilson; Robert C Glen; Gisbert Schneider Journal: Nat Rev Drug Discov Date: 2015-04-24 Impact factor: 84.694
Authors: N Sharma; M Kushwaha; D Arora; S Jain; V Singamaneni; S Sharma; R Shankar; S Bhushan; P Gupta; S Jaglan Journal: J Appl Microbiol Date: 2018-05-20 Impact factor: 3.772