Literature DB >> 33585181

Importance of Examined Lymph Node Number in Accurate Staging and Enhanced Survival in Resected Gastric Adenocarcinoma-The More, the Better? A Cohort Study of 8,696 Cases From the US and China, 2010-2016.

Lei Huang1, Xinyue Zhang2, Zhijian Wei1, Aman Xu1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: While most guidelines advocate D2 lymphadenectomy for non-metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma (nmGaC), it is not always performed as standard of care outside East Asia. The recommended minimal examined lymph node (ELN) count in nmGaC to stage cancer accurately varies largely across guidelines, and the optimal count to satisfactorily stratify patient survival has yet to be determined. This large cohort study aimed at robustly defining the minimal and optimal thresholds of examined lymph node (ELN) number in non-metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma (nmGaC).
METHODS: Data on nmGaC patients operated in 2010-2016 and surviving ≥3 months were retrieved from the US SEER-18 Program and a Chinese multi-institutional gastric cancer database (MIGC). The correlation of ELN count with stage migration and patient survival were quantified with the use of the multivariable-adjusted logistic and proportional hazards Cox models, respectively. The sequences of odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs) for each additional ELN were smoothed, and the structural breakpoints were determined.
RESULTS: Together 7,228 patients from the US and 1,468 from China were analyzed, encompassing 23,114 person-years of follow-up. The mean ELN count was 20 in the US and 30 in China. With more ELNs, both cohorts significantly showed proportional increases from lower to higher nodal stage (ORSEER = 1.03, 95%-CI = 1.03-1.04; ORMIGC = 1.02, 95%-CI = 1.02-1.03) and sequential enhancements in postoperative survival (HRSEER = 0.97, 95%-CI = 0.97-0.97; HRMIGC = 0.98, 95%-CI = 0.97-0.99). Correlations for both stage migration and survival were still significant in most subgroups by patient, cancer, and management factors. Breakpoint analyses revealed a minimum threshold ELN count of 17 and an optimum count of 33, which were validated in both cohorts with good efficacy to differentiate probabilities of both stage migration and survival.
CONCLUSION: In resected nmGaC patients with anticipated survival ≥3 months, more ELNs are correlated with more accurate staging, which may partly explain the survival correlation. This observational investigation does not indicate causality. Our findings robustly conclude 17 ELNs as the minimum and propose 33 ELNs as the optimum thresholds, to assess the quality of lymph node examination and to stratify postsurgical survival.
Copyright © 2021 Huang, Zhang, Wei and Xu.

Entities:  

Keywords:  accurate staging; examined lymph node count; gastric adenocarcinoma; large cohort study; long-term survival; multivariable breakpoint analysis; stage migration

Year:  2021        PMID: 33585181      PMCID: PMC7874152          DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.539030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Oncol        ISSN: 2234-943X            Impact factor:   6.244


  46 in total

1.  Lymph node staging in gastric cancer: is location more important than Number? An analysis of 1,038 patients.

Authors:  M S Karpeh; L Leon; D Klimstra; M F Brennan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Improving the standard of lymph node retrieval after gastric cancer surgery.

Authors:  George B Hanna; Iakovos Amygdalos; Melody Ni; Piers R Boshier; Sameh Mikhail; Josephine Lloyd; Robert Goldin
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 5.087

3.  Gastric cancer: French intergroup clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatments and follow-up (SNFGE, FFCD, GERCOR, UNICANCER, SFCD, SFED, SFRO).

Authors:  Aziz Zaanan; Olivier Bouché; Leonor Benhaim; Bruno Buecher; Nicolas Chapelle; Olivier Dubreuil; Nadim Fares; Victoire Granger; Christine Lefort; Johan Gagniere; Julie Meilleroux; Anne-Sophie Baumann; Veronique Vendrely; Michel Ducreux; Pierre Michel
Journal:  Dig Liver Dis       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 4.088

Review 4.  Management of gastric cancer in Asia: resource-stratified guidelines.

Authors:  Lin Shen; Yan-Shen Shan; Huang-Ming Hu; Timothy J Price; Bhawna Sirohi; Kun-Huei Yeh; Yi-Hsin Yang; Takeshi Sano; Han-Kwang Yang; Xiaotian Zhang; Sook Ryun Park; Masashi Fujii; Yoon-Koo Kang; Li-Tzong Chen
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 41.316

5.  Postoperative morbidity and mortality after D1 and D2 resections for gastric cancer: preliminary results of the MRC randomised controlled surgical trial. The Surgical Cooperative Group.

Authors:  A Cuschieri; P Fayers; J Fielding; J Craven; J Bancewicz; V Joypaul; P Cook
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-04-13       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Effect of the number of lymph nodes harvested on the long-term survival of gastric cancer patients according to tumor stage and location: a 12-year study of 1,637 cases.

Authors:  Zhanlong Shen; Yingjiang Ye; Qiwei Xie; Bin Liang; Kewei Jiang; Shan Wang
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2015-05-16       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Esophageal and Esophagogastric Junction Cancers, Version 2.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.

Authors:  Jaffer A Ajani; Thomas A D'Amico; David J Bentrem; Joseph Chao; Carlos Corvera; Prajnan Das; Crystal S Denlinger; Peter C Enzinger; Paul Fanta; Farhood Farjah; Hans Gerdes; Michael Gibson; Robert E Glasgow; James A Hayman; Steven Hochwald; Wayne L Hofstetter; David H Ilson; Dawn Jaroszewski; Kimberly L Johung; Rajesh N Keswani; Lawrence R Kleinberg; Stephen Leong; Quan P Ly; Kristina A Matkowskyj; Michael McNamara; Mary F Mulcahy; Ravi K Paluri; Haeseong Park; Kyle A Perry; Jose Pimiento; George A Poultsides; Robert Roses; Vivian E Strong; Georgia Wiesner; Christopher G Willett; Cameron D Wright; Nicole R McMillian; Lenora A Pluchino
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 11.908

8.  Lymph node counts in the upper abdomen: anatomical basis for lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer.

Authors:  P K Wagner; A Ramaswamy; J Rüschoff; P Schmitz-Moormann; M Rothmund
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Surgical/pathologic-stage migration confounds comparisons of gastric cancer survival rates between Japan and Western countries.

Authors:  A M Bunt; J Hermans; V T Smit; C J van de Velde; G J Fleuren; J A Bruijn
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Comparison of SEER Treatment Data With Medicare Claims.

Authors:  Anne-Michelle Noone; Jennifer L Lund; Angela Mariotto; Kathleen Cronin; Timothy McNeel; Dennis Deapen; Joan L Warren
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.178

View more
  2 in total

1.  Bone Metastasis From Gastric Adenocarcinoma-What Are the Risk Factors and Associated Survival? A Large Comprehensive Population-Based Cohort Study.

Authors:  Lei Huang; Yajie Zhao; Yan Shi; Weiguo Hu; Jun Zhang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 6.244

2.  Editorial: The use of chemotherapy in treating gastric cancers.

Authors:  Lei Huang; Yan Shi
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 5.738

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.