Literature DB >> 33584773

Only Extreme Fluctuations in Light Levels Reduce Lettuce Growth Under Sole Source Lighting.

Ruqayah Bhuiyan1, Marc W van Iersel1.   

Abstract

The cost of providing lighting in greenhouses and plant factories can be high. In the case of variable electricity prices, providing most of the light when electricity prices are low can reduce costs. However, it is not clear how plants respond to the resulting fluctuating light levels. We hypothesized that plants that receive a constant photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) will produce more biomass than those grown under fluctuating light levels. To understand potential growth reductions caused by fluctuating light levels, we quantified the effects of fluctuating PPFD on the photosynthetic physiology, morphology, and growth of 'Little Gem' and 'Green Salad Bowl' lettuce. Plants were grown in a growth chamber with dimmable white LED bars, alternating between high and low PPFDs every 15 min. The PPFDs were ∼400/0, 360/40, 320/80, 280/120, 240/160, and 200/200 μmol⋅m-2⋅s-1, with a photoperiod of 16 h and a DLI of ∼11.5 mol⋅m-2⋅day-1 in all treatments. CO2 was ∼800 μmol⋅mol-1. Plants in the 400/0 μmol⋅m-2⋅s-1 treatment had ∼69% lower An,30 (net assimilation averaged over 15 min at high and 15 min at low PPFD) than plants grown at a PPFD of 320/80 μmol⋅m-2⋅s-1 (or treatments with smaller PPFD fluctuations). The low An,30 in the 400/0, and to a lesser extent the 360/40 μmol⋅m-2⋅s-1 treatment was caused by low net assimilation at 360 and 400 μmol⋅m-2⋅s-1. Plants grown at 400/0 μmol⋅m-2⋅s-1 also had fewer leaves and lower chlorophyll content compared to those in other treatments. The four treatments with the smallest PPFD fluctuations produced plants with similar numbers of leaves, chlorophyll content, specific leaf area (SLA), dry mass, and leaf area. Chlorophyll content, An,30, and dry mass were positively correlated with each other. Our results show that lettuce tolerates a wide range of fluctuating PPFD without negative effects on growth and development. However, when fluctuations in PPFD are extreme (400/0 or 360/40 μmol⋅m-2⋅s-1), chlorophyll levels and An,30 are low, which can explain the low poor growth in these treatments. The ability of lettuce to tolerate a wide range of fluctuating light levels suggests that PPFD can be adjusted in response to variable electricity pricing.
Copyright © 2021 Bhuiyan and van Iersel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lactuca sativa; assimilation; chlorophyll; light-emitting diodes; photosynthesis; photosynthetic photon flux density; variable electricity prices

Year:  2021        PMID: 33584773      PMCID: PMC7875872          DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.619973

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Plant Sci        ISSN: 1664-462X            Impact factor:   5.753


  13 in total

Review 1.  Light-Dependent Protochlorophyllide Oxidoreductase: Phylogeny, Regulation, and Catalytic Properties.

Authors:  Michal Gabruk; Beata Mysliwa-Kurdziel
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 3.162

2.  The rise and fall of Light-Harvesting Complex Stress-Related proteins as photoprotection agents during evolution.

Authors:  Alberta Pinnola
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 6.992

3.  Improving photosynthesis and crop productivity by accelerating recovery from photoprotection.

Authors:  Johannes Kromdijk; Katarzyna Głowacka; Lauriebeth Leonelli; Stéphane T Gabilly; Masakazu Iwai; Krishna K Niyogi; Stephen P Long
Journal:  Science       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Photosynthetic responses to light variation in rainforest species : II. Carbon gain and photosynthetic efficiency during lightflecks.

Authors:  Robin L Chazdon; Robert W Pearcy
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Stomatal and photosynthetic responses during sun/shade transitions in subalpine plants: influence on water use efficiency.

Authors:  A K Knapp; W K Smith
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Importance of Fluctuations in Light on Plant Photosynthetic Acclimation.

Authors:  Silvere Vialet-Chabrand; Jack S A Matthews; Andrew J Simkin; Christine A Raines; Tracy Lawson
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 7.  Frequently asked questions about in vivo chlorophyll fluorescence: practical issues.

Authors:  Hazem M Kalaji; Gert Schansker; Richard J Ladle; Vasilij Goltsev; Karolina Bosa; Suleyman I Allakhverdiev; Marian Brestic; Filippo Bussotti; Angeles Calatayud; Piotr Dąbrowski; Nabil I Elsheery; Lorenzo Ferroni; Lucia Guidi; Sander W Hogewoning; Anjana Jajoo; Amarendra N Misra; Sergio G Nebauer; Simonetta Pancaldi; Consuelo Penella; DorothyBelle Poli; Martina Pollastrini; Zdzislawa B Romanowska-Duda; Beata Rutkowska; João Serôdio; Kancherla Suresh; Wiesław Szulc; Eduardo Tambussi; Marcos Yanniccari; Marek Zivcak
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Leaf photosynthetic and anatomical insights into mechanisms of acclimation in rice in response to long-term fluctuating light.

Authors:  Ze Wei; Fengying Duan; Xuezhen Sun; Xianliang Song; Wenbin Zhou
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2020-12-22       Impact factor: 7.228

Review 9.  Redox regulation of the Calvin-Benson cycle: something old, something new.

Authors:  Laure Michelet; Mirko Zaffagnini; Samuel Morisse; Francesca Sparla; María Esther Pérez-Pérez; Francesco Francia; Antoine Danon; Christophe H Marchand; Simona Fermani; Paolo Trost; Stéphane D Lemaire
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 5.753

10.  Longer Photoperiods with the Same Daily Light Integral Increase Daily Electron Transport through Photosystem II in Lettuce.

Authors:  Claudia Elkins; Marc W van Iersel
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-10
View more
  1 in total

1.  Non-structural carbohydrate dynamics and growth in tomato plants grown at fluctuating light and temperature.

Authors:  Ana Cristina Zepeda; Ep Heuvelink; Leo F M Marcelis
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 6.627

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.