Literature DB >> 28184008

Importance of Fluctuations in Light on Plant Photosynthetic Acclimation.

Silvere Vialet-Chabrand1, Jack S A Matthews1, Andrew J Simkin1, Christine A Raines1, Tracy Lawson2.   

Abstract

The acclimation of plants to light has been studied extensively, yet little is known about the effect of dynamic fluctuations in light on plant phenotype and acclimatory responses. We mimicked natural fluctuations in light over a diurnal period to examine the effect on the photosynthetic processes and growth of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). High and low light intensities, delivered via a realistic dynamic fluctuating or square wave pattern, were used to grow and assess plants. Plants subjected to square wave light had thicker leaves and greater photosynthetic capacity compared with fluctuating light-grown plants. This, together with elevated levels of proteins associated with electron transport, indicates greater investment in leaf structural components and photosynthetic processes. In contrast, plants grown under fluctuating light had thinner leaves, lower leaf light absorption, but maintained similar photosynthetic rates per unit leaf area to square wave-grown plants. Despite high light use efficiency, plants grown under fluctuating light had a slow growth rate early in development, likely due to the fact that plants grown under fluctuating conditions were not able to fully utilize the light energy absorbed for carbon fixation. Diurnal leaf-level measurements revealed a negative feedback control of photosynthesis, resulting in a decrease in total diurnal carbon assimilated of at least 20%. These findings highlight that growing plants under square wave growth conditions ultimately fails to predict plant performance under realistic light regimes and stress the importance of considering fluctuations in incident light in future experiments that aim to infer plant productivity under natural conditions in the field.
© 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28184008      PMCID: PMC5373038          DOI: 10.1104/pp.16.01767

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Physiol        ISSN: 0032-0889            Impact factor:   8.340


  53 in total

Review 1.  Improving yield by exploiting mechanisms underlying natural variation of photosynthesis.

Authors:  Tracy Lawson; David M Kramer; Christine A Raines
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 9.740

2.  Theoretical Considerations when Estimating the Mesophyll Conductance to CO(2) Flux by Analysis of the Response of Photosynthesis to CO(2).

Authors:  P C Harley; F Loreto; G Di Marco; T D Sharkey
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 3.  Improving photosynthetic efficiency for greater yield.

Authors:  Xin-Guang Zhu; Stephen P Long; Donald R Ort
Journal:  Annu Rev Plant Biol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 26.379

Review 4.  Pampered inside, pestered outside? Differences and similarities between plants growing in controlled conditions and in the field.

Authors:  Hendrik Poorter; Fabio Fiorani; Roland Pieruschka; Tobias Wojciechowski; Wim H van der Putten; Michael Kleyer; Uli Schurr; Johannes Postma
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 10.151

5.  The regulatory properties of Rubisco activase differ among species and affect photosynthetic induction during light transitions.

Authors:  A Elizabete Carmo-Silva; Michael E Salvucci
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  Light quantity controls leaf-cell and chloroplast development in Arabidopsis thaliana wild type and blue-light-perception mutants.

Authors:  E Weston; K Thorogood; G Vinti; E López-Juez
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.116

7.  Acclimation of Arabidopsis thaliana to the light environment: the existence of separate low light and high light responses.

Authors:  S Bailey; R G Walters; S Jansson; P Horton
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.116

8.  Thylakoid protein phosphorylation in higher plant chloroplasts optimizes electron transfer under fluctuating light.

Authors:  Mikko Tikkanen; Michele Grieco; Saijaliisa Kangasjärvi; Eva-Mari Aro
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 8.340

9.  Effects of kinetics of light-induced stomatal responses on photosynthesis and water-use efficiency.

Authors:  Lorna McAusland; Silvère Vialet-Chabrand; Philip Davey; Neil R Baker; Oliver Brendel; Tracy Lawson
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 10.151

10.  Simultaneous stimulation of sedoheptulose 1,7-bisphosphatase, fructose 1,6-bisphophate aldolase and the photorespiratory glycine decarboxylase-H protein increases CO2 assimilation, vegetative biomass and seed yield in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Andrew J Simkin; Patricia E Lopez-Calcagno; Philip A Davey; Lauren R Headland; Tracy Lawson; Stefan Timm; Hermann Bauwe; Christine A Raines
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 9.803

View more
  65 in total

1.  The Fluctuating Cell-Specific Light Environment and Its Effects on Cyanobacterial Physiology.

Authors:  Björn Andersson; Chen Shen; Michael Cantrell; David S Dandy; Graham Peers
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Fluctuating Light Interacts with Time of Day and Leaf Development Stage to Reprogram Gene Expression.

Authors:  Trang Schneider; Anthony Bolger; Jürgen Zeier; Sabine Preiskowski; Vladimir Benes; Sandra Trenkamp; Björn Usadel; Eva M Farré; Shizue Matsubara
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  Overexpression of the RieskeFeS Protein Increases Electron Transport Rates and Biomass Yield.

Authors:  Andrew J Simkin; Lorna McAusland; Tracy Lawson; Christine A Raines
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Stimulating photosynthetic processes increases productivity and water-use efficiency in the field.

Authors:  Patricia E López-Calcagno; Kenny L Brown; Andrew J Simkin; Stuart J Fisk; Silvere Vialet-Chabrand; Tracy Lawson; Christine A Raines
Journal:  Nat Plants       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 15.793

Review 5.  Fluctuating Light Takes Crop Photosynthesis on a Rollercoaster Ride.

Authors:  Elias Kaiser; Alejandro Morales; Jeremy Harbinson
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  CO2 uptake and chlorophyll a fluorescence of Suaeda fruticosa grown under diurnal rhythm and after transfer to continuous dark.

Authors:  Silas Wungrampha; Rohit Joshi; Ray S Rathore; Sneh L Singla-Pareek; Ashwani Pareek
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Suboptimal Acclimation of Photosynthesis to Light in Wheat Canopies.

Authors:  Alexandra J Townsend; Renata Retkute; Kannan Chinnathambi; Jamie W P Randall; John Foulkes; Elizabete Carmo-Silva; Erik H Murchie
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  Acclimation to Fluctuating Light Impacts the Rapidity of Response and Diurnal Rhythm of Stomatal Conductance.

Authors:  Jack S A Matthews; Silvere Vialet-Chabrand; Tracy Lawson
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 8.340

9.  Rapid Chlorophyll a Fluorescence Light Response Curves Mechanistically Inform Photosynthesis Modeling.

Authors:  Jonathan R Pleban; Carmela R Guadagno; David S Mackay; Cynthia Weinig; Brent E Ewers
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 10.  The Impacts of Fluctuating Light on Crop Performance.

Authors:  Rebecca A Slattery; Berkley J Walker; Andreas P M Weber; Donald R Ort
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 8.340

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.