Literature DB >> 33584484

Does Social Exclusion Improve Detection of Real and Fake Smiles? A Replication Study.

Simon Schindler1, Martin Trede1.   

Abstract

Research on social exclusion suggests an increased attention of excluded persons to subtle social cues. In one study (N = 32), published in Psychological Science, Bernstein et al. (2008) provided evidence for this idea by showing that participants in the social exclusion condition were better in correctly categorizing a target person's smile as real or fake. Although highly cited, this finding has never been directly replicated. The present study aimed to fill that gap. 201 participants (79.1% female) were randomly assigned to a social exclusion, social inclusion or control condition. Next, participants watched 20 videos of smiling persons and rated whether they show a real or a fake smile. In line with the original study, results showed that participants in the exclusion condition performed better than in the control condition. However, the performance did not differ between the exclusion and inclusion condition-although the pattern was in the predicted direction. In sum, the findings of our study increase rather than decrease confidence in the validity of the investigated idea, but results point to a substantially smaller effect.
Copyright © 2021 Schindler and Trede.

Entities:  

Keywords:  need to belong; ostracism; replication; smiles; social exclusion

Year:  2021        PMID: 33584484      PMCID: PMC7876225          DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.626087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Psychol        ISSN: 1664-1078


  15 in total

1.  Getting a cue: the need to belong and enhanced sensitivity to social cues.

Authors:  Cynthia L Pickett; Wendi L Gardner; Megan Knowles
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2004-09

2.  Why are you smiling at me? Social functions of enjoyment and non-enjoyment smiles.

Authors:  Lucy Johnston; Lynden Miles; C Neil Macrae
Journal:  Br J Soc Psychol       Date:  2009-03-17

3.  Adaptive responses to social exclusion: social rejection improves detection of real and fake smiles.

Authors:  Michael J Bernstein; Steven G Young; Christina M Brown; Donald F Sacco; Heather M Claypool
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-10

4.  Construct validity of the need to belong scale: mapping the nomological network.

Authors:  Mark R Leary; Kristine M Kelly; Catherine A Cottrell; Lisa S Schreindorfer
Journal:  J Pers Assess       Date:  2013-08-01

5.  P-curve: a key to the file-drawer.

Authors:  Uri Simonsohn; Leif D Nelson; Joseph P Simmons
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2013-07-15

6.  When and Why Being Ostracized Affects Veracity Judgments.

Authors:  Jennifer Eck; Christiane Schoel; Marc-André Reinhard; Rainer Greifeneder
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2019-07-17

7.  The Duchenne smile: emotional expression and brain physiology. II.

Authors:  P Ekman; R J Davidson; W V Friesen
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1990-02

8.  Perceptions of Duchenne and non-Duchenne smiles: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sarah D Gunnery; Mollie A Ruben
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2015-03-19

9.  Cyberostracism: effects of being ignored over the Internet.

Authors:  K D Williams; C K Cheung; W Choi
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2000-11

Review 10.  The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation.

Authors:  R F Baumeister; M R Leary
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 17.737

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.