Literature DB >> 33584446

Gambling-Specific Cognitions Are Not Associated With Either Abstract or Probabilistic Reasoning: A Dual Frequentist-Bayesian Analysis of Individuals With and Without Gambling Disorder.

Ismael Muela1, Juan F Navas2, José C Perales1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Distorted gambling-related cognitions are tightly related to gambling problems, and are one of the main targets of treatment for disordered gambling, but their etiology remains uncertain. Although folk wisdom and some theoretical approaches have linked them to lower domain-general reasoning abilities, evidence regarding that relationship remains unconvincing.
METHOD: In the present cross-sectional study, the relationship between probabilistic/abstract reasoning, as measured by the Berlin Numeracy Test (BNT), and the Matrices Test, respectively, and the five dimensions of the Gambling-Related Cognitions Scale (GRCS), was tested in a sample of 77 patients with gambling disorder and 58 individuals without gambling problems. RESULTS AND
INTERPRETATION: Neither BNT nor matrices scores were significantly related to gambling-related cognitions, according to frequentist (MANCOVA/ANCOVA) analyses, performed both considering and disregarding group (patients, non-patients) in the models. Correlation Bayesian analyses (bidirectional BF10) largely supported the null hypothesis, i.e., the absence of relationships between the measures of interest. This pattern or results reinforces the idea that distorted cognitions do not originate in a general lack of understanding of probability or low fluid intelligence, but probably result from motivated reasoning.
Copyright © 2021 Muela, Navas and Perales.

Entities:  

Keywords:  abstract reasoning; gambling disorder; gambling-related cognitions; intelligence; motivated reasoning; probabilistic reasoning

Year:  2021        PMID: 33584446      PMCID: PMC7873942          DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.611784

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Psychol        ISSN: 1664-1078


  61 in total

1.  It's not what you know, but how you use it: statistical knowledge and adolescent problem gambling.

Authors:  Paul Delfabbro; Julie Lahn; Peter Grabosky
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2006-07-25

2.  Heuristic thinking and human intelligence: a commentary on Marewski, Gaissmaier and Gigerenzer.

Authors:  Jonathan St B T Evans; David E Over
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2009-10-16

3.  An fMRI study of risk-taking following wins and losses: implications for the gambler's fallacy.

Authors:  Gui Xue; Zhonglin Lu; Irwin P Levin; Antoine Bechara
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 4.  Measuring cognitive distortions in pathological gambling: review and meta-analyses.

Authors:  Adam S Goodie; Erica E Fortune
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2013-02-25

5.  Trait and neurobiological underpinnings of negative emotion regulation in gambling disorder.

Authors:  Juan F Navas; Oren Contreras-Rodríguez; Juan Verdejo-Román; Ana Perandrés-Gómez; Natalia Albein-Urios; Antonio Verdejo-García; José C Perales
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 6.526

6.  The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): a new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers.

Authors:  H R Lesieur; S B Blume
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 18.112

7.  The role of affect-driven impulsivity in gambling cognitions: A convenience-sample study with a Spanish version of the Gambling-Related Cognitions Scale.

Authors:  Francesco Del Prete; Trevor Steward; Juan F Navas; Fernando Fernández-Aranda; Susana Jiménez-Murcia; Tian P S Oei; José C Perales
Journal:  J Behav Addict       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 6.756

8.  Reconsidering the roots, structure, and implications of gambling motives: An integrative approach.

Authors:  Juan R Barrada; Juan F Navas; Cristian M Ruiz de Lara; Joël Billieux; Gaëtan Devos; José C Perales
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Relationship of Working Memory, Processing Speed, and Fluid Reasoning in Psychiatric Patients.

Authors:  Se-Jin Kim; Eun Hee Park
Journal:  Psychiatry Investig       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 2.505

10.  Impulsive action but not impulsive choice determines problem gambling severity.

Authors:  Damien Brevers; Axel Cleeremans; Frederick Verbruggen; Antoine Bechara; Charles Kornreich; Paul Verbanck; Xavier Noël
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.