Fuschia M Sirois1, Janine Owens2. 1. Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom. 2. School of Clinical Dentistry, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Abstract
Objective: Health-care workers (HCW) are at risk for psychological distress during an infectious disease outbreak, such as the coronavirus pandemic, due to the demands of dealing with a public health emergency. This rapid systematic review examined the factors associated with psychological distress among HCW during an outbreak. Method: We systematically reviewed literature on the factors associated with psychological distress (demographic characteristics, occupational, social, psychological, and infection-related factors) in HCW during an outbreak (COVID-19, SARS, MERS, H1N1, H7N9, and Ebola). Four electronic databases were searched (2000 to 15 November 2020) for relevant peer-reviewed research according to a pre-registered protocol. A narrative synthesis was conducted to identify fixed, modifiable, and infection-related factors linked to distress and psychiatric morbidity. Results: From the 4,621 records identified, 138 with data from 143,246 HCW in 139 studies were included. All but two studies were cross-sectional. The majority of the studies were conducted during COVID-19 (k = 107, N = 34,334) and SARS (k = 21, N = 18,096). Consistent evidence indicated that being female, a nurse, experiencing stigma, maladaptive coping, having contact or risk of contact with infected patients, and experiencing quarantine, were risk factors for psychological distress among HCW. Personal and organizational social support, perceiving control, positive work attitudes, sufficient information about the outbreak and proper protection, training, and resources, were associated with less psychological distress. Conclusions: This review highlights the key factors to the identify HCW who are most at risk for psychological distress during an outbreak and modifying factors to reduce distress and improve resilience. Recommendations are that HCW at risk for increased distress receive early interventions and ongoing monitoring because there is evidence that HCW distress can persist for up to 3 years after an outbreak. Further research needs to track the associations of risk and resilience factors with distress over time and the extent to which certain factors are inter-related and contribute to sustained or transient distress.
Objective: Health-care workers (HCW) are at risk for psychological distress during an infectious disease outbreak, such as the coronavirus pandemic, due to the demands of dealing with a public health emergency. This rapid systematic review examined the factors associated with psychological distress among HCW during an outbreak. Method: We systematically reviewed literature on the factors associated with psychological distress (demographic characteristics, occupational, social, psychological, and infection-related factors) in HCW during an outbreak (COVID-19, SARS, MERS, H1N1, H7N9, and Ebola). Four electronic databases were searched (2000 to 15 November 2020) for relevant peer-reviewed research according to a pre-registered protocol. A narrative synthesis was conducted to identify fixed, modifiable, and infection-related factors linked to distress and psychiatric morbidity. Results: From the 4,621 records identified, 138 with data from 143,246 HCW in 139 studies were included. All but two studies were cross-sectional. The majority of the studies were conducted during COVID-19 (k = 107, N = 34,334) and SARS (k = 21, N = 18,096). Consistent evidence indicated that being female, a nurse, experiencing stigma, maladaptive coping, having contact or risk of contact with infectedpatients, and experiencing quarantine, were risk factors for psychological distress among HCW. Personal and organizational social support, perceiving control, positive work attitudes, sufficient information about the outbreak and proper protection, training, and resources, were associated with less psychological distress. Conclusions: This review highlights the key factors to the identify HCW who are most at risk for psychological distress during an outbreak and modifying factors to reduce distress and improve resilience. Recommendations are that HCW at risk for increased distress receive early interventions and ongoing monitoring because there is evidence that HCW distress can persist for up to 3 years after an outbreak. Further research needs to track the associations of risk and resilience factors with distress over time and the extent to which certain factors are inter-related and contribute to sustained or transient distress.
Authors: Robert G Maunder; William J Lancee; Sean Rourke; Jonathan J Hunter; David Goldbloom; Ken Balderson; Patricia Petryshen; Rosalie Steinberg; Donald Wasylenki; David Koh; Calvin S L Fones Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2004 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: Su Hong; Ming Ai; Xiaoming Xu; Wo Wang; Jianmei Chen; Qi Zhang; Lixia Wang; Li Kuang Journal: Nurs Outlook Date: 2020-07-19 Impact factor: 3.250
Authors: Andrzej Piotrowski; Ewa Sygit-Kowalkowska; Ole Boe; Samir Rawat Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-06-02 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Ann Marie Warren; Monica Bennett; Valerie Danesh; Anthony Waddimba; Mario Tovar; Robert L Gottlieb; Mark B Powers Journal: Psychiatry Res Commun Date: 2021-11-01
Authors: Eleonora P Uphoff; Chiara Lombardo; Gordon Johnston; Lauren Weeks; Mark Rodgers; Sarah Dawson; Catherine Seymour; Antonis A Kousoulis; Rachel Churchill Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-08-04 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Angelo Braga Mendonça; Eliane Ramos Pereira; Carinne Magnago; Pedro Gilson da Silva; Diva Cristina Morett Leão; Rose Mary Costa Rosa Andrade Silva; Karina Cardoso Meira Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-12-15 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Peter Thomas; Claire Baldwin; Lisa Beach; Bernie Bissett; Ianthe Boden; Sherene Magana Cruz; Rik Gosselink; Catherine L Granger; Carol Hodgson; Anne E Holland; Alice Ym Jones; Michelle E Kho; Lisa van der Lee; Rachael Moses; George Ntoumenopoulos; Selina M Parry; Shane Patman Journal: J Physiother Date: 2021-12-23 Impact factor: 7.000