Introduction: Regional differences in activation rates may contribute to the electrical substrates that maintain atrial fibrillation (AF), and estimating them non-invasively may help guide ablation or select anti-arrhythmic medications. We tested whether non-invasive assessment of regional AF rate accurately represents intracardiac recordings. Methods: In 47 patients with AF (27 persistent, age 63 ± 13 years) we performed 57-lead non-invasive Electrocardiographic Imaging (ECGI) in AF, simultaneously with 64-pole intracardiac signals of both atria. ECGI was reconstructed by Tikhonov regularization. We constructed personalized 3D AF rate distribution maps by Dominant Frequency (DF) analysis from intracardiac and non-invasive recordings. Results: Raw intracardiac and non-invasive DF differed substantially, by 0.54 Hz [0.13 - 1.37] across bi-atrial regions (R 2 = 0.11). Filtering by high spectral organization reduced this difference to 0.10 Hz (cycle length difference of 1 - 11 ms) [0.03 - 0.42] for patient-level comparisons (R 2 = 0.62), and 0.19 Hz [0.03 - 0.59] and 0.20 Hz [0.04 - 0.61] for median and highest DF, respectively. Non-invasive and highest DF predicted acute ablation success (p = 0.04). Conclusion: Non-invasive estimation of atrial activation rates is feasible and, when filtered by high spectral organization, provide a moderate estimate of intracardiac recording rates in AF. Non-invasive technology could be an effective tool to identify patients who may respond to AF ablation for personalized therapy.
Introduction: Regional differences in activation rates may contribute to the electrical substrates that maintain atrial fibrillation (AF), and estimating them non-invasively may help guide ablation or select anti-arrhythmic medications. We tested whether non-invasive assessment of regional AF rate accurately represents intracardiac recordings. Methods: In 47 patients with AF (27 persistent, age 63 ± 13 years) we performed 57-lead non-invasive Electrocardiographic Imaging (ECGI) in AF, simultaneously with 64-pole intracardiac signals of both atria. ECGI was reconstructed by Tikhonov regularization. We constructed personalized 3D AF rate distribution maps by Dominant Frequency (DF) analysis from intracardiac and non-invasive recordings. Results: Raw intracardiac and non-invasive DF differed substantially, by 0.54 Hz [0.13 - 1.37] across bi-atrial regions (R 2 = 0.11). Filtering by high spectral organization reduced this difference to 0.10 Hz (cycle length difference of 1 - 11 ms) [0.03 - 0.42] for patient-level comparisons (R 2 = 0.62), and 0.19 Hz [0.03 - 0.59] and 0.20 Hz [0.04 - 0.61] for median and highest DF, respectively. Non-invasive and highest DF predicted acute ablation success (p = 0.04). Conclusion: Non-invasive estimation of atrial activation rates is feasible and, when filtered by high spectral organization, provide a moderate estimate of intracardiac recording rates in AF. Non-invasive technology could be an effective tool to identify patients who may respond to AF ablation for personalized therapy.
Authors: Miguel Rodrigo; Andreu M Climent; Alejandro Liberos; Francisco Fernández-Avilés; Omer Berenfeld; Felipe Atienza; Maria S Guillem Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2017-09
Authors: Matthijs J M Cluitmans; Pietro Bonizzi; Joël M H Karel; Marco Das; Bas L J H Kietselaer; Monique M J de Jong; Frits W Prinzen; Ralf L M Peeters; Ronald L Westra; Paul G A Volders Journal: JACC Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2017-02-01
Authors: James Kneller; Jérôme Kalifa; Renqiang Zou; Alexey V Zaitsev; Mark Warren; Omer Berenfeld; Edward J Vigmond; L Joshua Leon; Stanley Nattel; José Jalife Journal: Circ Res Date: 2005-03-18 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Brian J Hansen; Jichao Zhao; Thomas A Csepe; Brandon T Moore; Ning Li; Laura A Jayne; Anuradha Kalyanasundaram; Praise Lim; Anna Bratasz; Kimerly A Powell; Orlando P Simonetti; Robert S D Higgins; Ahmet Kilic; Peter J Mohler; Paul M L Janssen; Raul Weiss; John D Hummel; Vadim V Fedorov Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2015-06-08 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: David Filgueiras-Rama; Raphael P Martins; Sergey Mironov; Masatoshi Yamazaki; Conrado J Calvo; Steve R Ennis; Krishna Bandaru; Sami F Noujaim; Jérôme Kalifa; Omer Berenfeld; José Jalife Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2012-03-30
Authors: Jorge Pedrón-Torrecilla; Miguel Rodrigo; Andreu M Climent; Alejandro Liberos; Esther Pérez-David; Javier Bermejo; Ángel Arenal; José Millet; Francisco Fernández-Avilés; Omer Berenfeld; Felipe Atienza; María S Guillem Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2016-02-26
Authors: Carlos Figuera; Víctor Suárez-Gutiérrez; Ismael Hernández-Romero; Miguel Rodrigo; Alejandro Liberos; Felipe Atienza; María S Guillem; Óscar Barquero-Pérez; Andreu M Climent; Felipe Alonso-Atienza Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2016-10-14 Impact factor: 4.566